Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Truck went into reduced acceleration yesterday. Got it to the dealer this morning, engine is toast. Faulty thrust bearing

2025 Ultimate 3.0L

6900km’s (4287 miles)

 

new crate engine coming but down for 4-6 weeks

Fault code P06DD

GM bulletin 25-NA-307

Edited by Catchme2003
Posted

Damm, I know that is what warranty's are for but depending on what individual does the work I cannot help but wonder if it would ever be the same. best of luck and hope it turns out well.

 

Yotaman

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Catchme2003 said:

Truck went into reduced acceleration yesterday. Got it to the dealer this morning, engine is toast. Faulty thrust bearing

2025 Ultimate 3.0L

6900km’s (4287 miles)

 

new crate engine coming but down for 4-6 weeks

Fault code P06DD

GM bulletin 25-NA-307

Sorry to read this. Really terrible news but luckily you have warranty. Hopefully the new engine won’t have the same issue. 

Posted

Thought all the 3L duramax engines were assembled in Flint. Could be wrong though

Posted

We had a post the other day regarding Toyota admitting they have clear issues regarding their newer engines in the Tundra. Here we have a clear example of the Mary Bara led GM were they have a clear known issue known with the trust plate and instead of issuing a recall to keep owners satisfied, the bean counters must of decided it is better to let as many fall out of warranty coverage as possible and only be forced to fix the ones who fall within the 3/36.

 

Sad to continue to see them drop the ball on everything they do it seems, seriously how many here have any faith in the next gen v-8's, because i sure don't!

  • Like 2
Posted

That's about the mileage.

 

Did they show you the thrust bearing piece?  The one we had looked like this:

 

 

Posted
58 minutes ago, BIGDOGx said:

We had a post the other day regarding Toyota admitting they have clear issues regarding their newer engines in the Tundra. Here we have a clear example of the Mary Bara led GM were they have a clear known issue known with the trust plate and instead of issuing a recall to keep owners satisfied, the bean counters must of decided it is better to let as many fall out of warranty coverage as possible and only be forced to fix the ones who fall within the 3/36.

 

Sad to continue to see them drop the ball on everything they do it seems, seriously how many here have any faith in the next gen v-8's, because i sure don't!

 

The 3.0's are warrantied to 5 years/100k by default. But yes, if GM is aware of the production run for the affected engines, those engines should be recalled and replaced.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/16/2026 at 2:45 PM, Catchme2003 said:

Truck went into reduced acceleration yesterday. Got it to the dealer this morning, engine is toast. Faulty thrust bearing

2025 Ultimate 3.0L

6900km’s (4287 miles)

 

new crate engine coming but down for 4-6 weeks

Fault code P06DD

GM bulletin 25-NA-307

 

Any indication that it was about to fail?

 

I've just rolled over 2,000 miles on mine and no issues so far, but I'm nowhere near out of the woods if the typical failure is sometime <10k.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, newdude said:

That's about the mileage.

 

Did they show you the thrust bearing piece?  The one we had looked like this:

 

 

haven't seen it yet but headed to the dealership shortly to pickup my loaner

 

1 hour ago, Atlas said:

 

Any indication that it was about to fail?

 

I've just rolled over 2,000 miles on mine and no issues so far, but I'm nowhere near out of the woods if the typical failure is sometime <10k.

No indication at all. Just doing a normal Sunday drive pulling my little snowmobile trailer ( 1900lbs) and the warning popped up on the dash and HUD, dropped down to 60km/h. Pulled over and shut the truck off, left it for a minute started again and continued on for another 5 minutes before it went reduced again. Continuous cycle to get back home. Long day!

Edited by Catchme2003
Posted
On 3/16/2026 at 5:45 PM, Catchme2003 said:

Truck went into reduced acceleration yesterday. Got it to the dealer this morning, engine is toast. Faulty thrust bearing

2025 Ultimate 3.0L

6900km’s (4287 miles)

 

new crate engine coming but down for 4-6 weeks

Fault code P06DD

GM bulletin 25-NA-307

As a new vehicle owner, engine replacement should be the last thing on your mind. To help offset some of the inconveniences incurred during this delay, we would like to offer our hand in support by connecting with your dealer and inquiring on any potential compensation options once repairs are completed. If interested, we ask you email us at [email protected] and using your forum username in the subject line. From there, we can discuss further.

Posted

Do you happen to know what your build date is?  Demonworks on YT was tracking them on the DuramaxNews website.  My 2025 is an April build, and I am at around 4500 miles. Getting ready for a 1500 mile road trip, and this is the last thing I want to be worried about.

Posted
1 hour ago, SPASierra said:

Do you happen to know what your build date is?  Demonworks on YT was tracking them on the DuramaxNews website.  My 2025 is an April build, and I am at around 4500 miles. Getting ready for a 1500 mile road trip, and this is the last thing I want to be worried about.

 

 

Not OP but the one we replaced an engine at work was a March 2025 truck, 2025 model year.  Let go at 5,408mi.  

 

The TSB was last updated at the end of January but still only has a model year range with no specific build range.  Just 2025 and 2026 model years as a whole so far.  

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, GMCustomerService said:

As a new vehicle owner, engine replacement should be the last thing on your mind. To help offset some of the inconveniences incurred during this delay, we would like to offer our hand in support by connecting with your dealer and inquiring on any potential compensation options once repairs are completed. If interested, we ask you email us at [email protected] and using your forum username in the subject line. From there, we can discuss further.

Thanks, sent you an email with the details

Posted
49 minutes ago, newdude said:

 

 

Not OP but the one we replaced an engine at work was a March 2025 truck, 2025 model year.  Let go at 5,408mi.  

 

The TSB was last updated at the end of January but still only has a model year range with no specific build range.  Just 2025 and 2026 model years as a whole so far.  

Thanks for the info!  I'm sure the failure rate vs number of trucks built with the 3.0L is still fairly low, but it doesn't instill confidence knowing it could let go at any time.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Did the KYBs keep it the same height in the front? I was concerned that pre-assembled assembly would raise it up an inch to standard non-z60 height.. I guess which it would make the rake 1 inch instead of 2 inches.
    • Thank you for keeping the train on the tracks and for a thoughtful engagement. I enjoyed the reflection on a previous stance to refine and improve your position. I like that inquisitive flexibility about you Atlas.    No the process isn't sterile. Hundreds, perhaps thousands of miles of piping, vessels, pumps. Chevron, the people I worked for, were keenly aware that there is a market for what is known as their "ISOCLEAN" line of lubricants. These are lubricants that are the same as those sold bulk that are further processed by filtration to a level your particular application demands. They will filter and package and provide lab documentation as required. Do not kid yourself. Every gallon of oil that goes into a Chevron Turbine, reciprocating compressor, generator is prefiltered and tested before being charged. Lest wise it was when I was there in the plants I worked in.    There are requirements set by manufactures for the cleanliness of the oils used in their equipment. OTR such as CUMMINS has standards shared with customers on this. Commercial interest selling to Ma and Pa do, but don't share that information. Not even upon request but internally, they do exist.    The GM study sited, (Graph from Machinery Lubrication in previous post) only shows "relative" importance.  I find that fascinating. By constructing the graph like this they admit there are dozens of factors in engine life and via scientific method determined the effect of 'relative cleanliness' on engine life not in miles but in 'FACTORS'. This allows a certain amount of reverse engineering does it not?   They even provided some touchstones. Beta 75 as a reference point. Wonderful stuff!!   Smaller blenders CAN and some DO take the time and effort to do better than a refinery or large bulk blender, like Warren Oil, in improving the "in the can" cleanliness. No I don't have a list but testing could generate that information.    Again, but one of several levers we can pull to improve engine life. The simplest is keeping a clean work station while doing your own oil changes.     
    • Thank you. I'll give it a try 
    • I just spent the last 45K miles doing samples every oil change over more than a full year to get the data for seasons and break-in to broke in.    I found the same thing to be true. Something was always teetering on done or had stepped off the cliff long before the OLM was DOA. In fact, I found about a thousand mile difference between summer and winter. That is during the winter half the OLM was STILL too long. Even the severe schedule was to long in the winter.   Now having done the work I can say I was NOT DISAPOINTED. I saw nothing I didn't already know. Nothing my father hadn't already demonstrated in his 2K OCI's pushing dated iron on dated oils and weak filters to mileages well beyond 300K.   Building on his work through use of Lab testing it wasn't hard to find the correlation between 'sight/feel/odor, the things dad relied on, and test results. Use of current viscosity stable chemistries & filters has pushed that marker for my motors out to 3K summer, 4K winter.    So the early lies were 3K on conventional oil and the lie upon the lie was 7K+. turns out to be off by a factor of two.    So... it is true that modern chemistry has doubled the useful oil life. But the base milage that came from was off by double. It's how good lies work. Partly true, sometimes mostly true so that your meter isn't set off. It also means that non-shear-stable shelf oils are only now as good as the old oils were in their best case scenario.    So the question now is how do we improve on that? Thus the question into cleanliness among the other items listed in the post quoted below.    If this bores you, feel free not to participate.       
    • Is it though?  Like LTZ, not a high take rate.  Current Sierra has AT4, Denali and Elevation as its main bread winners.  Each trim accounting for 25-35% of sales for Sierra.  SLT makes up about 10-15% at best.        Like others have predicted here for GMC, it will be:   - Pro (equal to WT Chevy)   - Elevation (replaces SLE and SLT)   - AT4 (and X)   - Denali (and Ultimate).  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...