Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

So, lot's of googling and reading, and a trial fit found, that indeed they hit the newer fatter caliper. I did some re-testing today, and found just 3/16" worth of washers was enough for the wheel to spin freely. I added 2 more on each, and again it spun freely. Tested lock to lock with the 4 washers, about 5/16" not quite the 3/8" Im considering, but pretty close. No issues. I've been looking at the BORA .375" spacers and using extended lugnuts to get back lost thread due to the spacer. All the ET lugs I've seen are all .33" reach inside the wheel lug holes. For those that don't like spacers or think they're unsafe, I think it depends on what type of spacers you're using and making sure you get good quality hubcentric ones, and if you're using bolt on ones, regular mainenance, checking the spacer lugs. Not wanting or needing that much spread. Looking for the minimum that will let me run these rims and tires.  it does look to stick out a little, but I really want put these on. and use the stock all-terrains in the winter. 

102_0054.JPG

102_0056.JPG

Edited by revmanii
Posted

I get preference in appearance, but if this were my truck I don't think adding the additional complexity and liability of washer/spacers and still having minimal caliper clearance would be worth forcing the fit of 2014 wheels on a 2026. I do agree with you, hub-centric spacers are probably the "best" way to go if you have to run any spacer at all.

 

Is there a newer T1 style wheel you could swap without additional hardware or clearance issues?

Posted

I would be highly surprised you don't get any vibration from using washers instead of doing it the right way, washers will not allow the rim to sit flush against the rotor hub. Washers don't have the exact thickness from washer to washer. 

Posted

Washers?  I hope you aren't serious about just running washers.  Or using them with spacers.  

 

Either do spacers, or get new wheels.  

Posted
25 minutes ago, newdude said:

Washers?  I hope you aren't serious about just running washers.  Or using them with spacers.  

 

Either do spacers, or get new wheels.  

100% agree,  you will lose alot of strength by using washers your studs will be carrying all the weight. You are setting yourself up for a disaster.  

Posted (edited)

Washers were just for fitment check obviously. I'd never drive it that way. I checked one front tire. Its turns fine with about .165" washer pack. 

Edited by revmanii
Posted
4 hours ago, StingerZ16 said:

I assume the Picture is the 2014 wheels.

I had similar ones on my 2012.

I like those.

 

Yeah, there's a ton of them out there. You see them on a lot of extended cab Silverados, but I think they look great on a std cab/std bed, and you rarely see that. In the 12 years I've been running them, I think I've only seen 1, maybe 2 other std cabs running them. 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Atlas said:

I get preference in appearance, but if this were my truck I don't think adding the additional complexity and liability of washer/spacers and still having minimal caliper clearance would be worth forcing the fit of 2014 wheels on a 2026. I do agree with you, hub-centric spacers are probably the "best" way to go if you have to run any spacer at all.

 

Is there a newer T1 style wheel you could swap without additional hardware or clearance issues?

 

Yeah, I'm struggling with it. I'd love to put them on. I've done enough research to believe the BORA .375" spacers with extended lug nuts would be a solid, safe solution.  I'm not that worried about the spacer thing, other than the cost to do it right. As for new wheels, I look at new wheels, and they all look the same to me. Way too busy. I'm old school I like them simple not to mention how much the new aftermarket wheels cost. 

Edited by revmanii
Posted (edited)
41 minutes ago, revmanii said:

 

Yeah, I'm struggling with it. I'd love to put them on. I've done enough research to believe the BORA .375" spacers with extended lug nuts would be a solid, safe solution.  I'm not that worried about the spacer thing, other than the cost to do it right. As for new wheels, I look at new wheels, and they all look the same to me. Way too busy. I'm old school I like them simple not to mention how much the new aftermarket wheels cost. 

 

 

 

OE replica wheels are always a great option, and they are the same factory designs from 2019-newer trucks.  Search results – OE Wheels

 

You can do plenty of the newer style 18" wheel options in different finishes.  Good quality too, I've ran this brand before.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, revmanii said:

 

Yeah, I'm struggling with it. I'd love to put them on. I've done enough research to believe the BORA .375" spacers with extended lug nuts would be a solid, safe solution.  I'm not that worried about the spacer thing, other than the cost to do it right. As for new wheels, I look at new wheels, and they all look the same to me. Way too busy. I'm old school I like them simple not to mention how much the new aftermarket wheels cost. 

 

Absolutely. And they do look good on there. But if you are thinking of maybe going with another style, I like the idea of OE replica wheels mentioned above. Or even a set of OE take-offs from someone who has done a wheel swap.

 

When I had my 2020 LT/Z71 crew cab, I considered swapping the base wheel for a set of 18" trail boss wheels. Some people don't like all black wheels but I really like the pattern. Of course now I have a TB so I don't think about swapping wheels anymore.

 

 

Screenshot 2026-06-24 at 13.56.18.png

Posted
1 hour ago, Atlas said:

 

Absolutely. And they do look good on there. But if you are thinking of maybe going with another style, I like the idea of OE replica wheels mentioned above. Or even a set of OE take-offs from someone who has done a wheel swap.

 

When I had my 2020 LT/Z71 crew cab, I considered swapping the base wheel for a set of 18" trail boss wheels. Some people don't like all black wheels but I really like the pattern. Of course now I have a TB so I don't think about swapping wheels anymore.

 

 

Screenshot 2026-06-24 at 13.56.18.png

 

 

The wheels I want to put on are takeoffs. I bought them at the same time I bought my 2014 Silverado. I have come across a vendor that appears to sell replicas of these, but they still won't fit my 2026 without spacers from what I've been able to tell. Their fitment years for the wheel stop at '22  if I remember correctly.

Posted

You already know what I think about spacers but I will say those wheels do look great on your truck. Either way, I hope you find an outcome you’re happy with. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...