Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Retested the connector, seems to test OK. Resistance across the pins on the EGR appear healthy.

 

I didn't have much time last night so I decided to take the Blazer for a drive up and over a mountain pass to put some heat and air into the engine and observe.

 

On the ascent I left it in 3rd gear to keep the RPM up, 2500-3000. Coolant stayed cool, 195-199. I received a P0134 code unexpectedly (Upstream? O2 sensor inactivity) which was weird. I cleared the code and it never came back. O2's are doing their bouncing between lean and rich it appears.

 

After the pass there's a good long 5-7 miles of high speed cruising. I never got P0104/ egr flow insufficient in 4th/OD between 55 and 70mph, so that keyed me to observe that I don't get the EGR code at higher speeds and I don't get it at lower speeds if I keep the RPM higher, i.e. 3rd gear. If I leave it in 4th, P0104 will set as high as 50/55mph on light throttle. In 3rd, it won't set until I'm down to 30mph or so.

 

I don't know what that means, but I think it could mean something.

 

I doubt the old EGR was actually bad, pins test OK. I doubt the new EGR is bad. Something has changed or I've somehow blocked the EGR passage way down inside the intake where I can't see. Or there's a vacuum leak, but the MAP seems to report healthy vacuum at idle and cruising.

 

One thing I don't understand: Ignition advance on the scanner reads all over the place, but mostly negative. -15, -20, -30 seems fairly common. I don't think I've ever seen it positive, it's rarely ever near 0. I read that this can be an issue with scanners and OBD 1.5 simply not reading correctly. I doubt that too. OBD 1.5 was such a narrow period in time, and rare, there's just not a lot of information out there for modern times.

 

I'm at that point, first time in a long time, where I feel like I'm in over my head. This isn't making sense and I don't have the tools I truly need to get to the bees knees on this issue.

 

Edited by Atlas
  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Atlas said:

Retested the connector, seems to test OK. Resistance across the pins on the EGR appear healthy.

 

I didn't have much time last night so I decided to take the Blazer for a drive up and over a mountain pass to put some heat and air into the engine and observe.

 

On the ascent I left it in 3rd gear to keep the RPM up, 2500-3000. Coolant stayed cool, 195-199. I received a P0134 code unexpectedly (Upstream? O2 sensor inactivity) which was weird. I cleared the code and it never came back. O2's are doing their bouncing between lean and rich it appears.

 

After the pass there's a good long 5-7 miles of high speed cruising. I never got P0104/ egr flow insufficient in 4th/OD between 55 and 70mph, so that keyed me to observe that I don't get the EGR code at higher speeds and I don't get it at lower speeds if I keep the RPM higher, i.e. 3rd gear. If I leave it in 4th, P0104 will set as high as 50/55mph on light throttle. In 3rd, it won't set until I'm down to 30mph or so.

 

I don't know what that means, but I think it could mean something.

 

I doubt the old EGR was actually bad, pins test OK. I doubt the new EGR is bad. Something has changed or I've somehow blocked the EGR passage way down inside the intake where I can't see. Or there's a vacuum leak, but the MAP seems to report healthy vacuum at idle and cruising.

 

One thing I don't understand: Ignition advance on the scanner reads all over the place, but mostly negative. -15, -20, -30 seems fairly common. I don't think I've ever seen it positive, it's rarely ever near 0. I read that this can be an issue with scanners and OBD 1.5 simply not reading correctly. I doubt that too. OBD 1.5 was such a narrow period in time, and rare, there's just not a lot of information out there for modern times.

 

I'm at that point, first time in a long time, where I feel like I'm in over my head. This isn't making sense and I don't have the tools I truly need to get to the bees knees on this issue.

 

You’re not over your head you’re just frustrated. I usually take a break and put the question on YouTube for ideas. I’m a little OCD so it’s a challenge. The information is out there. Patience is the key.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Atlas said:

I'm at that point, first time in a long time, where I feel like I'm in over my head. This isn't making sense and I don't have the tools I truly need to get to the bees knees on this issue.

Focus only on the recurring problem. Don't go looking for more. If the recurring problem is the EGR code; fix that. Ignore data that is irrelevant to diagnosing that ONE issue. 

 

It doesn't matter what the O2 sensors are reading or the timing is doing (yet) until the recurring problem is resolved. (If the diagnosis of the EGR requires O2 readings or timing advance readings then obviously use them.)

 

FWIW: I remember watching the timing advance on my 07 Silverado, and those numbers sound similar to what I recall.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, asilverblazer said:

Focus only on the recurring problem. Don't go looking for more. If the recurring problem is the EGR code; fix that. Ignore data that is irrelevant to diagnosing that ONE issue. 

 

It doesn't matter what the O2 sensors are reading or the timing is doing (yet) until the recurring problem is resolved. (If the diagnosis of the EGR requires O2 readings or timing advance readings then obviously use them.)

 

FWIW: I remember watching the timing advance on my 07 Silverado, and those numbers sound similar to what I recall.

 

 

 

That's part of the problem...the EGR has already been replaced, and I've already had the complete intake assembly removed, and the EGR passages were clear at that time. That leaves wiring, PCM, or another variable that I wasn't expecting. Best I can tell, it's not wiring or the PCM, so I'm grasping for straws.

 

The PCM uses the MAP reading to confirm the requisite loss of vacuum in the manifold when the EGR activates. Since that's vacuum related, it involves a lot of other systems which could play a role.

 

The overall diagnosis has to be considered too. The fuel lines in the intake had rubbed through and were dumping fuel into the intake, drowning the cylinders in fuel, and putting raw fuel into the sump and cat converter. The fuel system has been fixed but the complete path of damage may not be. If the cat was damaged and melted the internals, it could be partially obstructed and also playing into the EGR issue.

 

I'm retracing my steps; trying to go back to thinking thinking Horses not Zebras based on the clues I've been given. These engines aren't *that* complex.

 

Could it be, now that the truck is running well, that carbon and crud from being run with the fuel system in disarray is now dislodging and clogged my clean EGR passages where I can't see?  That's what the code is actually saying. The flow is restricted, dummy. Retrace step 1.

 

I may just need to remove the lower intake again. Before I do that I'm going to try removing the EGR and running the engine for a few seconds to see if it will blow anything lodged in the egr passages out through the open ports.

 

19 hours ago, Black02Silverado said:

Great thread. As for parts did you try.  www.car-part.com?   

 

That's been helpful in the past. For the spider injector, there's no guarantee I'll get a working one. The spider I have seems fine now that the high pressure fuel line isn't making an early delivery via large hole. SO at least I'm not marooned and looking for one of those.

 

Row52 (dot com) is also a good one for watching for vehicles at local yards.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Okay Punch What year is your truck or did you already mention that ? Can you link the TSB is about that noise ? 
    • Thrust bearing is a very small window.  But nice try.   Turbo oil filter?  Haven't seen any failures.  Change your oil more frequently.  Use a better oil than the factory oil.  
    • There is a p/n called out in the one PI that GM has.  Curt 57003 inline load adapter that is used for LED trailers that are having trouble with these newer trucks.  No cutting, no splicing, etc.  GM did update the lighting module around 2023 to better pick up trailers with LED lighting, but it still can happen.     Here's the link to the Curt site for it - 7-Way RV Blade LED Electrical Adapter (Not a Wiring Extension) SKU #57003 by CURT   The PI I am referencing - MC-10208985-9999.pdf   Its not just a GM deal either.  Newer Fords and Rams have this same problem.       In another PI, they recommend that the trailer has a Pollock brand 7 way on it as that is who makes the truck sides for the OEMs.  GM is also big on making sure the trailer is trouble free.  So no wiring issues, all lights are functional, better quality 7 way plug, etc.     The other PI I am referencing - MC-10178359-9999.pdf   The model year range is older but it is the current PI for 2014-2026.  It calls out the Pollock RV HD 7 way they recommend.  
    • That's part of the problem...the EGR has already been replaced, and I've already had the complete intake assembly removed, and the EGR passages were clear at that time. That leaves wiring, PCM, or another variable that I wasn't expecting. Best I can tell, it's not wiring or the PCM, so I'm grasping for straws.   The PCM uses the MAP reading to confirm the requisite loss of vacuum in the manifold when the EGR activates. Since that's vacuum related, it involves a lot of other systems which could play a role.   The overall diagnosis has to be considered too. The fuel lines in the intake had rubbed through and were dumping fuel into the intake, drowning the cylinders in fuel, and putting raw fuel into the sump and cat converter. The fuel system has been fixed but the complete path of damage may not be. If the cat was damaged and melted the internals, it could be partially obstructed and also playing into the EGR issue.   I'm retracing my steps; trying to go back to thinking thinking Horses not Zebras based on the clues I've been given. These engines aren't *that* complex.   Could it be, now that the truck is running well, that carbon and crud from being run with the fuel system in disarray is now dislodging and clogged my clean EGR passages where I can't see?  That's what the code is actually saying. The flow is restricted, dummy. Retrace step 1.   I may just need to remove the lower intake again. Before I do that I'm going to try removing the EGR and running the engine for a few seconds to see if it will blow anything lodged in the egr passages out through the open ports.     That's been helpful in the past. For the spider injector, there's no guarantee I'll get a working one. The spider I have seems fine now that the high pressure fuel line isn't making an early delivery via large hole. SO at least I'm not marooned and looking for one of those.   Row52 (dot com) is also a good one for watching for vehicles at local yards.  
    • Disassembly may be Required!   Every blender makes claims but do  you ponder those claims? What was really said? Was it true?  Motive for saying it? What does in infer?  Is that inference true?    Let's do one.    Claim: Made from shear stable base oils.    What was said: Base Oils are shear proof.   Was it true: Yes.  ALL base oils are Newtonian.    Motive / Inference: To imply the fully formulated product is Shear Proof.    Is the Inference true?: Most fully formulated multigrade oils contain Viscosity Modifiers or VM's, sometimes called VII or Viscosity Index Improvers. There are four types. One is in fact shear proof but it also has a bad effect on extreme cold flow and is restricted to use in specialty oils. A second has limited shear called a 0-5 SSI polymer. Meaning its shear is limited to a range of zero to five percent as reported by the ASTM D6278 Shear Stability Index test. A few high end oils, like Torco SR-5, use them and brag about it profusely. Actually all that use it point it out. The last two shear dramatically and are often marketed as a 'feature' of the product aiding the oil to meet fuel standard requirements of ever stricter rules. One shears more than 5% and the other up to 20%. As you make guess, cost is directly linked to shear down and as such the majority of oils use the cheapest organic polymers sold to make grade and pass stringent tests.    PPD's or Pour Point Depressants also shear a bit, only a few percent and hide inside the 0-5 SSI capabilities.    The blender knows he can not out engineer Stribeck. Physics is not a suggestion. But he can wordcraft the unsuspecting toward believing a false claims INFERENCE. This is LEGAL. It is COMMON, and it is EFFECTIVE.         
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...