Jump to content

shifting into 4wd


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have an 07 classic GMC, and have read the manual. But it's still not too clear to me about shifting into 4L and back, manual says to be in neutral but at less than 3km per hour?

 

Does that mean you should be rolling very slowly and have the tranny in N?

 

What's the best way based on real world experience ?

Posted
I have an 07 classic GMC, and have read the manual. But it's still not too clear to me about shifting into 4L and back, manual says to be in neutral but at less than 3km per hour?

 

Does that mean you should be rolling very slowly and have the tranny in N?

 

What's the best way based on real world experience ?

 

 

 

 

Well, the easiest way is to stop the truck, shift to neutral, then engage the 4-LO. Works every time for me. They only recommend moving "slowly" (which is near impossible really, by the time the computer sees that it's moving below x amount mph the truck would've stopped) because it's SLIGHTLY easier to engage the front hubs if they're rotating.

Posted

I usually roll slow when shifting into 4L. When I had the manual T-case, I had to be rolling a little or my gears wouldn't mesh. I have the electronic T-case on my 97, and it seems to do best when I am rolling real slow.

 

Try it a few times on level grass or gravel to see how your truck acts. You will always get a good clunk when shifting in and out of 4L, at least in my experience. 4H shifts nice and quite, but it clunks into 4L.

 

Steve

Posted

My transmission guy does all work for GM recommends you...stop, put in park,turn ignition off, shift into 4L, restart engine. Common to bend shifter fork and ruin bushings in transfer case doing otherwise.

Posted
My transmission guy does all work for GM recommends you...stop, put in park,turn ignition off, shift into 4L, restart engine. Common to bend shifter fork and ruin bushings in transfer case doing otherwise.

 

 

 

 

Anyone else tried this? Seems to me having the engine on or off wouldn't make any difference...unless I'm missing something. If it works then I'll definately give it a shot...just curious if anyone has tried this?

 

Also what is that large clunk when it engages 4-LO? Sounds like the transfer case is going to grenade all over the road!

Posted
My transmission guy does all work for GM recommends you...stop, put in park,turn ignition off, shift into 4L, restart engine. Common to bend shifter fork and ruin bushings in transfer case doing otherwise.

 

 

 

 

GM doesn't recommend ALL that.

 

The idea is to engage with as little clash and clunking as possible, in my case it is traveling about idle speed, put the transmission in neutral, then apply brake as needed to slow the vehicle to a very slow roll. Then press the 4 lo button while maintaing that very slow roll. If I engage it while stopped it clashes trying to line everything up.

 

Similar method works on my Dad's manual T-case.

Posted
My transmission guy does all work for GM recommends you...stop, put in park,turn ignition off, shift into 4L, restart engine. Common to bend shifter fork and ruin bushings in transfer case doing otherwise.

 

 

 

 

GM doesn't recommend ALL that.

 

The idea is to engage with as little clash and clunking as possible, in my case it is traveling about idle speed, put the transmission in neutral, then apply brake as needed to slow the vehicle to a very slow roll. Then press the 4 lo button while maintaing that very slow roll. If I engage it while stopped it clashes trying to line everything up.

 

Similar method works on my Dad's manual T-case.

 

 

 

 

 

I've tried the slow roll way of going in to 4-LO and i still get the clank. I've tried it stopped with the engine running and get the clank....just trying to figure out if there is a way for me to not get the clank going into 4-LO.

Posted
there are several reasons to shut vehicle off to change...no clang...shifter fork is very easy to bend and is mounted on plastic bushings....

 

 

 

 

Just curious why shutting the engine off stops the clang noise?

 

 

 

 

 

 

there is still a little bit of motion being passed thru the trans in neutral due to internal drag

Posted

Either I've got an oddball transfer case or I'm just not hearing it, but I don't notice any loud noises while shifting into 4-LO. I've had the windows down and radio off when I put it in low range but I can just barely hear a "thump" coming from the front as the axles engage.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thrust bearing is a very small window.  But nice try.   Turbo oil filter?  Haven't seen any failures.  Change your oil more frequently.  Use a better oil than the factory oil.  
    • There is a p/n called out in the one PI that GM has.  Curt 57003 inline load adapter that is used for LED trailers that are having trouble with these newer trucks.  No cutting, no splicing, etc.  GM did update the lighting module around 2023 to better pick up trailers with LED lighting, but it still can happen.     Here's the link to the Curt site for it - 7-Way RV Blade LED Electrical Adapter (Not a Wiring Extension) SKU #57003 by CURT   The PI I am referencing - MC-10208985-9999.pdf   Its not just a GM deal either.  Newer Fords and Rams have this same problem.       In another PI, they recommend that the trailer has a Pollock brand 7 way on it as that is who makes the truck sides for the OEMs.  GM is also big on making sure the trailer is trouble free.  So no wiring issues, all lights are functional, better quality 7 way plug, etc.     The other PI I am referencing - MC-10178359-9999.pdf   The model year range is older but it is the current PI for 2014-2026.  It calls out the Pollock RV HD 7 way they recommend.  
    • That's part of the problem...the EGR has already been replaced, and I've already had the complete intake assembly removed, and the EGR passages were clear at that time. That leaves wiring, PCM, or another variable that I wasn't expecting. Best I can tell, it's not wiring or the PCM, so I'm grasping for straws.   The PCM uses the MAP reading to confirm the requisite loss of vacuum in the manifold when the EGR activates. Since that's vacuum related, it involves a lot of other systems which could play a role.   The overall diagnosis has to be considered too. The fuel lines in the intake had rubbed through and were dumping fuel into the intake, drowning the cylinders in fuel, and putting raw fuel into the sump and cat converter. The fuel system has been fixed but the complete path of damage may not be. If the cat was damaged and melted the internals, it could be partially obstructed and also playing into the EGR issue.   I'm retracing my steps; trying to go back to thinking thinking Horses not Zebras based on the clues I've been given. These engines aren't *that* complex.   Could it be, now that the truck is running well, that carbon and crud from being run with the fuel system in disarray is now dislodging and clogged my clean EGR passages where I can't see?  That's what the code is actually saying. The flow is restricted, dummy. Retrace step 1.   I may just need to remove the lower intake again. Before I do that I'm going to try removing the EGR and running the engine for a few seconds to see if it will blow anything lodged in the egr passages out through the open ports.     That's been helpful in the past. For the spider injector, there's no guarantee I'll get a working one. The spider I have seems fine now that the high pressure fuel line isn't making an early delivery via large hole. SO at least I'm not marooned and looking for one of those.   Row52 (dot com) is also a good one for watching for vehicles at local yards.  
    • Disassembly may be Required!   Every blender makes claims but do  you ponder those claims? What was really said? Was it true?  Motive for saying it? What does in infer?  Is that inference true?    Let's do one.    Claim: Made from shear stable base oils.    What was said: Base Oils are shear proof.   Was it true: Yes.  ALL base oils are Newtonian.    Motive / Inference: To imply the fully formulated product is Shear Proof.    Is the Inference true?: Most fully formulated multigrade oils contain Viscosity Modifiers or VM's, sometimes called VII or Viscosity Index Improvers. There are four types. One is in fact shear proof but it also has a bad effect on extreme cold flow and is restricted to use in specialty oils. A second has limited shear called a 0-5 SSI polymer. Meaning its shear is limited to a range of zero to five percent as reported by the ASTM D6278 Shear Stability Index test. A few high end oils, like Torco SR-5, use them and brag about it profusely. Actually all that use it point it out. The last two shear dramatically and are often marketed as a 'feature' of the product aiding the oil to meet fuel standard requirements of ever stricter rules. One shears more than 5% and the other up to 20%. As you make guess, cost is directly linked to shear down and as such the majority of oils use the cheapest organic polymers sold to make grade and pass stringent tests.    PPD's or Pour Point Depressants also shear a bit, only a few percent and hide inside the 0-5 SSI capabilities.    The blender knows he can not out engineer Stribeck. Physics is not a suggestion. But he can wordcraft the unsuspecting toward believing a false claims INFERENCE. This is LEGAL. It is COMMON, and it is EFFECTIVE.         
    • I don't recall ever dealing with one on an '06 and back. It may not even exist on that. I can't remember for sure.   Any kind of ice in or after the evaporator is normally due to low charge with both a clutch-cycling orifice tube system, and a TXV system.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...