Jump to content

Grinding Brake Calipers To Fit 16" Rims?

jesse1378

Recommended Posts

jesse1378 Enthusiast

jesse1378

Posted
Posted

i use to have a ford lightning and people would grind the calipers to fit 15" rims for skinnies and slick for the track. there were no issues with grinding them down, the safety and functionallity were the same, just less material on the outside. i was just wondering if anyone has tried this on the 07+ body style. Or if there is even enough material that it can be ground down and still work properly. I am a fan of the old school smal,l wide rims with round tires. i dont want to jack the truck up sky to have enough room to do that and with 17s i dont see it giving me enough sidewall.

 

OR

 

what if the "classic" body style rotor and caliper were put on, would that be enough brake to safely stop the new body style truck? what about if the rotors were performance, and the pads ceramic? you guys can fit 16s on that body style right?

 

just thinking out loud. its time to start deciding what i'm doing to the truck and of course rims and rubber popped up right after lifting.(2" RC leveling kit first, MAYBE 3" BL)

Thanks in advance for your input, Jesse

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
kawtoy_77 Enthusiast

kawtoy_77

Posted
Posted
I was wondering the same thing... would a 16 inch rim fit on a GMT900 or will it hit the calipers for sure?

It will hit the calipers FOR SURE. I looked into this when I was tire shopping. Found a set of (4) chrome 16" OEM steelies (from a gmt800) with Cooper Discoverers for $200! We tried, but it was no good.

 

I Didn't feel like compromising the integrity of my brake calipers...... If you changed all of the calipers and rotors maybe it would work.....

Zembonez Senior Enthusiast

Zembonez

Posted
Posted

You'd have to grind off quite a bit of the caliper to make them fit. I sure wouldn't do it. I'm a little too attached to my brakes to go removing metal from the calipers myself..

L76PWRD Enthusiast

L76PWRD

Posted
Posted

Tried adding some 16s on my 2006 Silverado, the 16s will fit the rear drums. But the front calipers won't clear the rims.

jesse1378 Enthusiast

jesse1378

Posted
  • Author
Posted

with the lightnings there was no safety issues. no degrigation in the caliper. it was still solid metal after being ground down. have the new body styles started showing up in junk yards yet? maybe i can pic up a caliper from there and just start grining on it and see what happens

Zembonez Senior Enthusiast

Zembonez

Posted
Posted
with the lightnings there was no safety issues. no degrigation in the caliper. it was still solid metal after being ground down. have the new body styles started showing up in junk yards yet? maybe i can pic up a caliper from there and just start grining on it and see what happens

A lot would depend on how much needed to be removed.

 

I guess I'm just not understanding why the switch to 16s in a need?

Matt_ Senior Enthusiast

Matt_

Posted
Posted
with the lightnings there was no safety issues. no degrigation in the caliper. it was still solid metal after being ground down.

 

How did you verify there weren't any safety issues? Just because someone didn't have one fail? There's a fine line between "no issues" and "lucky".

 

Did someone run analysis to see what the new fatigue life of those calipers are? Cut one in half to measure the actual wall thickness and do some pressure vessel calcs to determine the stresses?

 

You're screwing with the single MOST IMPORTANT safety feature on the vehicle. Keep in mind that with high material costs and efforts to reduce weight, I highly doubt there's a lot of excess material there that wasn't deemed necessary by extensive analysis.

 

Show me some FEA and calc's and we'll talk. But if all you got is "some back yard mechanics did it and didn't have a problem"... then I'd advise you to think a little bit more and consider the consequences.

vettelovralexand Enthusiast

vettelovralexand

Posted
Posted

Does anyone know if a smaller wheel will fit on the rear of the GMT-900 with the drum brakes? I mean, if a 15 would fit that would make finding a set of wheels and slicks much easier for a night at the track.

brent1234 Enthusiast

brent1234

Posted
Posted

i agree 100% with Matt your brakes are the most important thing on your truck. Its not you that is going to pay the price of this its going to be the person you rear end!!

jesse1378 Enthusiast

jesse1378

Posted
  • Author
Posted

they have been running them on 600+HP street trucks since 99 with no failure issues. one of the top guys did have some type of data on it, but i am no longer a member of the forum and i have been away from that for a couple years so i dont even know where to begin to look.

 

what about the "classic" style brake and rotors. those will allow 16s correct? can they be fitted on the newer body style?

 

i dont have a need for 16s i just want to try something different.

dlstewart01 Senior Enthusiast

dlstewart01

Posted
Posted
they have been running them on 600+HP street trucks since 99 with no failure issues. one of the top guys did have some type of data on it, but i am no longer a member of the forum and i have been away from that for a couple years so i dont even know where to begin to look.

 

what about the "classic" style brake and rotors. those will allow 16s correct? can they be fitted on the newer body style?

 

i dont have a need for 16s i just want to try something different.

 

GM went to the larger rotors and improved calipers in 2005. Putting on 04 and eariler would be a step backwards.. :cheers:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • revmanii
      Starting a new thread regarding mounting my 2014 OEM wheels to my 2026

      By revmanii · Posted

      The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • Atlas
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Atlas · Posted

      My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • Buckwild27
      Gas Prices

      By Buckwild27 · Posted

      I agree. 
    • Atlas
      Gas Prices

      By Atlas · Posted

      87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...