Jump to content

Is your GMT-900 using oil  

1,555 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wow that's crap.. On my invoice 8 plugs were itemized along with the other parts, gaskets, etc etc.

 

 

Any one else that had the piston and ring job, get plugs included?

Posted

NNBS 2007 Sierra 5.3l CC Z71. Oil consumption started around 25k miles, and has progressively gotten worse. Now has 45k miles. I have used only Royal Purple 5w30 and its starting to get REALLY expensive.

 

I also have a 2009 silverado with the 5.3 l with just under 30k miles and absolutely no oil consumption..

 

James

Posted

Get a tuner and turn off the AFM on the 09' for sure. Probably too late on the 07'. Maybe Talk to hillbilly4u and get advice on what route he took, assuming your out of powertrain warranty.

Posted

Yup the piston/ring job fixed my oil issue. And 8 new spark plugs were included :)

 

They charged me 80 bucks for plugs. Said mine were in good shape and GM wouldn't pay for them. Can't figure out how the rings were stuck from carbon but the plugs were fine.

 

did you get it back in piece?, how's she run?
Posted

Yup the piston/ring job fixed my oil issue. And 8 new spark plugs were included :)

 

They charged me 80 bucks for plugs. Said mine were in good shape and GM wouldn't pay for them. Can't figure out how the rings were stuck from carbon but the plugs were fine.

 

did you get it back in piece?, how's she run?

 

 

The job only took 3 days. Can't tell any difference in power. The AFM is more pronounced when it kicks in, for some reason. Sounds like a small air compressor under the hood. Could be just a vibration. Have only put a couple hundred miles on it so far, so I can't comment on the oil issue just yet.

Posted

Hillbilly, did you get to see any of the job or get to see the pistons?

 

 

 

Yeah, I saw the heads off and some shiny new pistons. Anyway, I've put 300k so far and no consumption. By now, after an oil change the oil would have already turned color. Checked it today and it was still honey colored.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Mine is an 07 with the 5.3 and AFM. I use Mobil 1 or Penzoil Synthetic oil with a Wix oil filter. I changed my oil this weekend with 5000 miles on it. When I drained the oil into the pan, I put it back into the one of the old oil bottles. It filled the bottle back to just over 4 quarts. It takes about 6 quarts to fill the truck to the line.

 

I used about 2 quarts in about 5000 miles.

 

 

WOW! I can not believe what I'm reading!!! I've read all these post twice and am in shock! I have an 08, 4.8 with 23,600 and no leaks so far. I've read leaking at less tha 12k which is unbelievable! I don't even know what a AFM is but do know my old 94 Z-71 with a 350/5.7 which has been around since 1967. My old truck never burned any oil with over 200,000 miles!! it leaked a little from the rear main and valve covers but never burnt oil. I've been a Chevy guy since the 60's and hope I never have to buy a Dodge or especially a Ford but this is scary!! Maybe I need to sell it and buy another older Chevy truck with another 350 in it. The tranny went at 120k but the engine was great. Actually my old truck was a lot tighter than my new one!!

Posted

Any one else that had the piston and ring job, get plugs included?

 

 

They put in 2 plugs, because they had broken them off. That was at 75K, and I know the manual doesn't call for new ones 'til 100K.

 

Anyway, I've now got 15K miles on it since the pistons + rings, with no consumption. I've got about another 18K miles of motor warranty left from the extension they gave me. If it hold oil that long, I'll got ahead & keep it.

 

FC

  • Like 1
Posted

I've got a 2009 Silverado 1500 CC with the 5.3 Aluminum block\ and AFM

 

I've got the noisy lifters issue.

 

Used 3 qts of oil starting from an oil change at 42000 miles until the other day when I brought it back to the dealer.

 

Getting a crummy 14mpg in mixed drivng with it leaning more towards highway driving.

 

Some hesitation a times after letting off the gas and getting back on it a little.

 

My dealer has been great so far, they have acknowledged the lifter noise as being an issue. He is going to start an oil consumption test, but with the truck at 49000 miles right now, it should not use any oil at all between oil changes.

 

We will be starting the oil consumption test tomorrow, and I am going to go over the TSB's for the truck with the dealer to find out which ones may be applicable. We both have the goal of wanting to do any teardowns only once. I am hopefull that they will implement all the TSB's for the lifters and oil usage during this teardown.

 

How many of you guys were given new engines after having everything replaced failed ?

 

If you're engine was replaced what kind of warranty did you get on that engine ?

 

Has anyone noticed any difference in the MPG they are getting once the consumption issue had been fixed ?

 

When GM extended the Power Train Warranty how long or how many miles did the extend it by ?

 

Thanks

 

Frank

Posted

New lifters, pistons, rings and all things associated with those jobs will be covered for the full PT warranty, at least that's the way I understand it (I had all those done). Also the way I understand it (correct me if I'm wrong) is if you have PT work done at 99,999 miles, those parts are warrantied for another 12K.

 

I dont think they will replace the engine unless the block is somehow damaged. My MPG's did not change from pre-work to after work, as a matter of fact they are really good with the BBP tune I have and the AFM off.

Posted (edited)

Sixathome,

 

What are your MPG before and after tune ???

 

I'm averaging 14 MPG with GM 20inch tires 275/15/r20

 

Thanks

 

Frank

Edited by frankycjr
Posted
Some hesitation a times after letting off the gas and getting back on it a little.

 

 

That is called torque management and has nothing to do with oil consumption.

Posted

Sixathome,

 

What are your MPG before and after tune ???

 

Thanks

 

Frank

 

It really depends on how I drive I guess, The DIC before the tune was like IIRC read on avg 17 ish and now maybe 15 ish or so maybe higher. It can really do good on highway driving with the tune and AFM off, probably like 18's.
Posted

I had the same issue with my 2009 Silverado 1500 pick up. They changed the rings and pistons under full warranty. Oil consumption is ok. After 5k I am down about a quart. Gas mileage is at 14 mph highway and/or city. They say its normal. I didnt do anything to the AFM. Not sure I would know how and if it would void warranty.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...