Jump to content

Is your GMT-900 using oil  

1,555 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

If they had just built the engines correctly right from the get, we wouldn't be commenting in this 45 page thread - Dexos, or no Dexos.

 

As far as I'm concerned, GM can take their Dexos and shove it where the sun don't shine ...

  • Like 2
Posted

If they had just built the engines correctly right from the get, we wouldn't be commenting in this 45 page thread - Dexos, or no Dexos.

 

As far as I'm concerned, GM can take their Dexos and shove it where the sun don't shine ...

I'm right there with ya.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

2004 silverado Z71 5.3L iron block [215,650 miles] I run royal purple and go 3,500 miles between changes, my engine burns about 1 quart between changes. Dosent leak oil and no misfires. I do get lifter tick on startup

  • 1 month later...
Posted

140,000 miles. Quart of oil every 1000 miles. Dealer did a top engine re-build at 60k and it's back.

 

Stuck piston rings is there excuse now, told me to pour marvels mystery oil in spark plug hole to help eat away carbon.

 

Just keep adding oil and driving.

Posted (edited)

It is a sad testament to GM quality. My factory remanned 12.7L Detroit, 704,000 miles into its second life, only uses about 1 qt per 10,000 miles. Just did oil change on it at 21,580 miles on the oil and it only used 2 qt.

Edited by Cowpie
  • Like 3
Posted

A couple of notes for the thread; for the "privilege" of living here in California I had to get my truck smogged and the smog check up does not like what ever the Range AFM disabler does to the system. If you are due for a smog check and running a programer, disable the programer 60-100 miles before your smog test. After I pulled the plug on my range, and drove for a week, she passed just fine.

I am done with synthetic oil. Two changes ago I switched to delo400 (15W-40) and the difference, while the sample size is small and the observations empirical, are positive. I hear less valve slap, I hold more consistent oil pressure on the gauge, and burn less oil, though I am changing it 4,000 miles instead of approximately 10,000 when the computer told me to change it, so theres less time to burn oil between changes.

Posted

As long as the HDEO also meets gasoline API SN, shouldn't be an issue. I have used HDEO oils in gas engines.

  • Like 1
Posted

A couple of notes for the thread; for the "privilege" of living here in California I had to get my truck smogged and the smog check up does not like what ever the Range AFM disabler does to the system. If you are due for a smog check and running a programer, disable the programer 60-100 miles before your smog test. After I pulled the plug on my range, and drove for a week, she passed just fine.

I am done with synthetic oil. Two changes ago I switched to delo400 (15W-40) and the difference, while the sample size is small and the observations empirical, are positive. I hear less valve slap, I hold more consistent oil pressure on the gauge, and burn less oil, though I am changing it 4,000 miles instead of approximately 10,000 when the computer told me to change it, so theres less time to burn oil between changes.

I'm going to try using a synthetic 5w-40 diesel oil this time hoping the high detergent oil will help clean the rings. I have tried the Marvin's Mystery oil in the oil approximately 65 miles before I changed it. It seemed to help for awhile. I had better oil pressure and less smoke afterwards. We'll see how the 5W-40 works. If it helps I'll let you know.

Posted

Use a synthetic or semi syn 10w30. Get the same HDEO package as with a 5w40.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I'm going to try using a synthetic 5w-40 diesel oil this time hoping the high detergent oil will help clean the rings. I have tried the Marvin's Mystery oil in the oil approximately 65 miles before I changed it. It seemed to help for awhile. I had better oil pressure and less smoke afterwards. We'll see how the 5W-40 works. If it helps I'll let you know.

We'll using 5w40 seems to be helping a lot. I have about 75% less smoke at start up and so far after about 700 miles the oil is still full. Oil pressure is holding about 40 as well. Used to drop to under 30 at highway speeds with 5w30 conventional.

Posted

I had an oil burning issue with my 2006 Cadillac CTS 3.6L. Put on a catch can and changed to Pennzoil 10w30 conventional and it cleaned things up pretty good. Plan of keeping the car for a lot longer. According to the Petroleum Quality Institute of America testing, the PYB 10w30 has a very stout additive package with a great level of detergents. There are many good options. If I hadn't done what I did and gotten good results, I would have been inclined to go the similar route you did, Northman.

Posted

minimal/no loss with my 05 LM7, 206k miles running Amsoil since 100k. My catch can MIGHT have a few ounces, 1-3oz in 5-6k miles.

Posted

We'll using 5w40 seems to be helping a lot. I have about 75% less smoke at start up and so far after about 700 miles the oil is still full. Oil pressure is holding about 40 as well. Used to drop to under 30 at highway speeds with 5w30 conventional.

1200 miles. Checked oil this am and it was just a little under the full mark. Oil pressure still strong. Looks like its working. My wife is taking it to MN this weekend to bring my grandson back to his mama. Its about 600 miles round trip. I'll check it when she gets back and let you know what it says.

  • Like 1
Posted

Well I figured I was imune, but I'm not LOL. My wife's 2008 Tahoe with 130K miles had no oil showing on the dipstick!! It was 1.5 quart low at 30% OLM. I read the first 100 posts of this thread and then skipped to,the end. Was there ever a discussion of cause? Do the inactivated cylinders suck in oil due to closed valves (high vacuum) and then the rings carbo up and then don't seal well? That's the only thing I can think of. Or is there some other mechanism leading. To,the oil consumption?

 

If I install the Range, will the engine clean up on its own?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks tight. Not a lot of working room. Hows yous knuckles?
    • Spot on. The government makes ridiculous mandates, and this causes manufacturers to jump through hoops for every TENTH of a MPG. Main reason quality is in the toilet and prices are in the stratosphere.   The gov't tightened the MPG requirements so much 5 years ago that the only way manufacturers could meet these absolutely ridiculous numbers was to go all EV. Hence the push.     Nobody hates good MPG, Atlas - nobody is "whining". Your side has that trait all locked up. What a stupid argument attempt!   What I particularly hate is the government meddling in the free market system. Had this system been allowed to work as designed and intended by our Founders, cars and trucks would be hitting numbers that would blow our minds, all while costing 30% LESS. Not only that, but engines could probably hit 150k miles again without needing major internal surgery.   My forty year old Ford 302 has 312k on it. Wonder what changed?🤔
    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...