Jump to content

Have You Smoked A Hemi 5.7 Today?


mikewood31

Recommended Posts

Posted

With a name like your's is currently showing I guess there's no surprise that you'd make a claim like that.110% total b.s. by the way.

 

 

Yeah, you keep telling yourself that. :lol:

 

 

Ford troll: No one cares about ecoboost, not even you guys - seriously. Who wants a truck that sounds like a 4 banger anyways? The 6.2 Harley from the factory won't even spin the tires from a dig. It has a built in safety feature to prevent it even when adv. traction is disabled plus you never see them like ever. Believe me, I have been looking for them :devil:

  • Replies 131
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

It takes awhile (upper rpm) to get the 5.0 pulling, they don't snap off the line from a stock tune too well imo but once they start going, they are strong. Not as strong as the 6.2 however :chevrolet:

 

 

Well duh! How does the Ford's 6.2 match up against the GM 6.2...wouldn't that be a better comparison?

 

Your right the ford 6.2 would be a better match, but whens the last time you seen one on the road.

I haven't seen any yet.

Last I saw the Ford 6.2 was put into a off-road package trucks(35" tires, lifted an so on) that I'm sure aren't going to run real good numbers in the 1/4 mile or light to light.

Oh and 6016 LBS that is one heavy pig.

 

 

Well, it is available...and the Ecoboost will also give the GM 6.2L a run for it's money too...in fact, in stock form, it will beat it.

 

 

INCORRECT there "nomoregm4me", I mean "Boss302"

 

It's quite obvious you have absolutely no clue what you are talking about when it come to this Ford Ecoboost. Not even the Ford guys want anything to due with the Ecoboost engine. Most of the information put out by Ford about this new engine was a marketing scheme and have been proven to be lies, everyone knows that from the independent tests that were done.

I have to admit that when this was introduced, it had me really thinking about looking at one and I have been reading and following discussion on the Ford forums since day 1 when this engine was introduced, I just didn't join the forum and troll around all day......

Guys on the F-150 forum are complaining about getting ONLY 15.2- 16mpg highway and 12mpg in town with this powerplant running higher octane fuel, sounds good huh? Makes me want to run right out and buy one (glad I didn't). Most of them complain about not being able to do better than 16mpg at 60mph, guess Ford forgot to mention that in their add. Nothing like getting feedback from actual owners of the vehicles, not some kid in his mothers basement attempting to cause problems on an internet forum.

Also have a lot of those Ford guys on their forum saying that if they could do it over again, they would NOT get the Ecoboost but instead the 5.0 or 6.2. Many of them looking into trading out of the Ecoboost as well....Before making false statements about some truck you wish you had but can't afford, do some research and see what the owners of them have to say.

 

I'll end this post with my favorite quote from the F-150 forum by a user named "Cbag's EB", it may break your Ford Ecoboost warshipping heart but he is an owner and not very impressed with it, here ya go :

 

"Cbag's EB" "I would take the 5.0 over my EB I think they drive great, five of my friends and I all bought

New F 150's this past year, we talk numbers and I have driven all of them often. One buddy got the 6.2, two got the 5.0, and two of us got the EB. If I could trade my EB for 5.0 or 6.2 I would. In what I have seen the only edge the EB has is bottom end pulling a large trailer because once you get to speed the EB will get no more then 6mpg. The EB is unable to do anything other flat ground cruise set at 40mph before it needs the turbos, my buddy's 5.0 get better mpg then the two EB when towing, city, highway. And it sounds like a truck. Once you get up to 70mph the 6.2 even does better, empty or towing. "

 

And if ya think I changed it or made it up, here's a link you can read with your own eyes, post #5

http://www.f150forum.com/f70/drove-my-buddies-2012-ecoboost-131084/

Posted

It takes awhile (upper rpm) to get the 5.0 pulling, they don't snap off the line from a stock tune too well imo but once they start going, they are strong. Not as strong as the 6.2 however :chevrolet:

 

 

Well duh! How does the Ford's 6.2 match up against the GM 6.2...wouldn't that be a better comparison?

 

Your right the ford 6.2 would be a better match, but whens the last time you seen one on the road.

I haven't seen any yet.

Last I saw the Ford 6.2 was put into a off-road package trucks(35" tires, lifted an so on) that I'm sure aren't going to run real good numbers in the 1/4 mile or light to light.

Oh and 6016 LBS that is one heavy pig.

 

 

Well, it is available...and the Ecoboost will also give the GM 6.2L a run for it's money too...in fact, in stock form, it will beat it.

 

 

INCORRECT there "nomoregm4me", I mean "Boss302"

 

It's quite obvious you have absolutely no clue what you are talking about when it come to this Ford Ecoboost. Not even the Ford guys want anything to due with the Ecoboost engine. Most of the information put out by Ford about this new engine was a marketing scheme and have been proven to be lies, everyone knows that from the independent tests that were done.

I have to admit that when this was introduced, it had me really thinking about looking at one and I have been reading and following discussion on the Ford forums since day 1 when this engine was introduced, I just didn't join the forum and troll around all day......

Guys on the F-150 forum are complaining about getting ONLY 15.2- 16mpg highway and 12mpg in town with this powerplant running higher octane fuel, sounds good huh? Makes me want to run right out and buy one (glad I didn't). Most of them complain about not being able to do better than 16mpg at 60mph, guess Ford forgot to mention that in their add. Nothing like getting feedback from actual owners of the vehicles, not some kid in his mothers basement attempting to cause problems on an internet forum.

Also have a lot of those Ford guys on their forum saying that if they could do it over again, they would NOT get the Ecoboost but instead the 5.0 or 6.2. Many of them looking into trading out of the Ecoboost as well....Before making false statements about some truck you wish you had but can't afford, do some research and see what the owners of them have to say.

 

I'll end this post with my favorite quote from the F-150 forum by a user named "Cbag's EB", it may break your Ford Ecoboost warshipping heart but he is an owner and not very impressed with it, here ya go :

 

"Cbag's EB" "I would take the 5.0 over my EB I think they drive great, five of my friends and I all bought

New F 150's this past year, we talk numbers and I have driven all of them often. One buddy got the 6.2, two got the 5.0, and two of us got the EB. If I could trade my EB for 5.0 or 6.2 I would. In what I have seen the only edge the EB has is bottom end pulling a large trailer because once you get to speed the EB will get no more then 6mpg. The EB is unable to do anything other flat ground cruise set at 40mph before it needs the turbos, my buddy's 5.0 get better mpg then the two EB when towing, city, highway. And it sounds like a truck. Once you get up to 70mph the 6.2 even does better, empty or towing. "

 

And if ya think I changed it or made it up, here's a link you can read with your own eyes, post #5

http://www.f150forum...coboost-131084/

 

 

 

Well said.

Posted

Yeah, you keep telling yourself that. :lol:

 

How 'bout you put up, or shut up? Wait, that whole idea is dead now in today's age of "Icanbeatoughinternetguyalliwantbecausemymommytoldmeso" jockeys.

 

Do us all a favor troll, make like Micheal Jackson and beat it. Thanks for playing.

 

P.S. I've got a CRISP $100 on my 6.2 over your Ecoboob or 5 liter wonder children trucks, ANYDAY and twice on Sunday.

Posted

P.S. I've got a CRISP $100 on my 6.2 over your Ecoboob or 5 liter wonder children trucks, ANYDAY and twice on Sunday.

 

 

Can I have a Piece of that :crackup: I could use the extra $100...

Posted

Me too!! I could use the money towards my new rims. LOL

 

 

 

Lol! or some Rhino Liner

 

 

Rhino lining, no thanks thats only if you use your truck for work. :P

Mine is a family carrier and play.

Posted

It takes awhile (upper rpm) to get the 5.0 pulling, they don't snap off the line from a stock tune too well imo but once they start going, they are strong. Not as strong as the 6.2 however :chevrolet:

 

 

Well duh! How does the Ford's 6.2 match up against the GM 6.2...wouldn't that be a better comparison?

 

Your right the ford 6.2 would be a better match, but whens the last time you seen one on the road.

I haven't seen any yet.

Last I saw the Ford 6.2 was put into a off-road package trucks(35" tires, lifted an so on) that I'm sure aren't going to run real good numbers in the 1/4 mile or light to light.

Oh and 6016 LBS that is one heavy pig.

 

 

Well, it is available...and the Ecoboost will also give the GM 6.2L a run for it's money too...in fact, in stock form, it will beat it.

 

 

INCORRECT there "nomoregm4me", I mean "Boss302"

 

It's quite obvious you have absolutely no clue what you are talking about when it come to this Ford Ecoboost. Not even the Ford guys want anything to due with the Ecoboost engine. Most of the information put out by Ford about this new engine was a marketing scheme and have been proven to be lies, everyone knows that from the independent tests that were done.

I have to admit that when this was introduced, it had me really thinking about looking at one and I have been reading and following discussion on the Ford forums since day 1 when this engine was introduced, I just didn't join the forum and troll around all day......

Guys on the F-150 forum are complaining about getting ONLY 15.2- 16mpg highway and 12mpg in town with this powerplant running higher octane fuel, sounds good huh? Makes me want to run right out and buy one (glad I didn't). Most of them complain about not being able to do better than 16mpg at 60mph, guess Ford forgot to mention that in their add. Nothing like getting feedback from actual owners of the vehicles, not some kid in his mothers basement attempting to cause problems on an internet forum.

Also have a lot of those Ford guys on their forum saying that if they could do it over again, they would NOT get the Ecoboost but instead the 5.0 or 6.2. Many of them looking into trading out of the Ecoboost as well....Before making false statements about some truck you wish you had but can't afford, do some research and see what the owners of them have to say.

 

I'll end this post with my favorite quote from the F-150 forum by a user named "Cbag's EB", it may break your Ford Ecoboost warshipping heart but he is an owner and not very impressed with it, here ya go :

 

"Cbag's EB" "I would take the 5.0 over my EB I think they drive great, five of my friends and I all bought

New F 150's this past year, we talk numbers and I have driven all of them often. One buddy got the 6.2, two got the 5.0, and two of us got the EB. If I could trade my EB for 5.0 or 6.2 I would. In what I have seen the only edge the EB has is bottom end pulling a large trailer because once you get to speed the EB will get no more then 6mpg. The EB is unable to do anything other flat ground cruise set at 40mph before it needs the turbos, my buddy's 5.0 get better mpg then the two EB when towing, city, highway. And it sounds like a truck. Once you get up to 70mph the 6.2 even does better, empty or towing. "

 

And if ya think I changed it or made it up, here's a link you can read with your own eyes, post #5

http://www.f150forum...coboost-131084/

 

 

:lol: calm down there bud, I NEVER said anything about the Ecoboost's fuel efficiency did I? I also have stated many times that I am actually NOT a fan of the Ecoboost (or any V6 turbo) and that I would take either the 5.0 or the 6.2 over it.

 

What I did say is that the Ecoboost F150 is a mid-14 second truck....stock! And it WILL beat the GM 6.2L stock vs stock.

 

Oh, and please tell me how you have one single clue about what I can afford? Just so you know, I could go buy a brand new truck nicer than yours today for cash. So put that in your pipe and smoke it. ;)

Posted

This one is good

took it right from a comment on you tube.

 

 

 

"I have a 2011 fx4. And? even i have to admit that chevys 6.2 is the fastest truck made right now. Ive seen a brand new chevy run 14.2 in the 1/4, bone stock with 3.43s. In hot weather. So us ford guess and dodge guys. SHUT UP!!! Ford is the nicest dodge is second nicest chevy is the fastest. End of story!! FACT"

Posted

This one is good

took it right from a comment on you tube.

 

 

 

"I have a 2011 fx4. And? even i have to admit that chevys 6.2 is the fastest truck made right now. Ive seen a brand new chevy run 14.2 in the 1/4, bone stock with 3.43s. In hot weather. So us ford guess and dodge guys. SHUT UP!!! Ford is the nicest dodge is second nicest chevy is the fastest. End of story!! FACT"

 

 

A comment from youtube? Well, I retract everything I said as that MUST be true. :lol:

Posted

This one is good

took it right from a comment on you tube.

 

 

 

"I have a 2011 fx4. And? even i have to admit that chevys 6.2 is the fastest truck made right now. Ive seen a brand new chevy run 14.2 in the 1/4, bone stock with 3.43s. In hot weather. So us ford guess and dodge guys. SHUT UP!!! Ford is the nicest dodge is second nicest chevy is the fastest. End of story!! FACT"

 

 

A comment from youtube? Well, I retract everything I said as that MUST be true. :lol:

 

 

 

LOL............AGAIN this may be really hard for you to understand BUT the above comment is also from somebody who owns one, not a guy having a pipe dream.

 

We should all stop responding to this troll, he has taken this thread off topic...........It started out as road rage when a HEMI is attempting to merg into your lane and loos where it's gone....All because of this Ford TROLL who probably isn't even old enough to drive.

Posted

This one is good

took it right from a comment on you tube.

 

 

 

"I have a 2011 fx4. And? even i have to admit that chevys 6.2 is the fastest truck made right now. Ive seen a brand new chevy run 14.2 in the 1/4, bone stock with 3.43s. In hot weather. So us ford guess and dodge guys. SHUT UP!!! Ford is the nicest dodge is second nicest chevy is the fastest. End of story!! FACT"

 

 

A comment from youtube? Well, I retract everything I said as that MUST be true. :lol:

 

 

 

LOL............AGAIN this may be really hard for you to understand BUT the above comment is also from somebody who owns one, not a guy having a pipe dream.

 

We should all stop responding to this troll, he has taken this thread off topic...........It started out as road rage when a HEMI is attempting to merg into your lane and loos where it's gone....All because of this Ford TROLL who probably isn't even old enough to drive.

 

 

Why do you feel the need to be so juvenile and hostile? Just because I happen to like the Ford F150 better than your beloved GM (at this moment anyway)?

 

I find it very ironic and hypocritical that you accuse me of being a child right after blatantly breaking forum rules by making a juvenile personal attack.

 

Grow up!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 5,439 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...