Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Lol. Or how about the official quarter mile on the C7 being 12.2 is no faster than CTS v.... Whooptee do....

Sent from the Great White North

OK, cool, argue with me, I have driven both, and the seat of the pants in the Vette vs the V was huge to me. I have driven the C6 Z06 and the ZL1 and to me the Stingray was more impressive than the others and being that it is only 450 HP vs the 540 V car and 580 ZL1 I was impressed, no need to get butt hurt it was just my opinion

Whose butt hurt. You can have your opinion but look at some facts. The v is 556 HP BTW lol. Seat of the pants doesn't mean much when they pass through the traps at the same time.

 

 

Sent from the Great White North

Posted (edited)

Alright, you win, I have no clue. Sorry to have wasted your time brilliant sir

Edited by NitroCherokee
Posted

Alright, you win, I have no clue. Sorry to have wasted your time brilliant sir

I know what your saying. Though maybe he is talking about a four door can fly just as well as a two door though, I think the corvette will have longer legs when speeds reach over 100+ so choose your poison. I like them both and it wouldn't be hard to slap a supercharger on the corvette and leave the competition behind.

Posted
Lol.... hmmmm. That Vette weighs a good 1000 lbs less than either the v or the zl1. Make my car a thousand pounds less and its no contest.

Sent from the Great White North

But it is not 1000 lbs lighter so it is a contest? Make my truck 5000 LBS lighter and it'd be fast too! WTF is your point?

Lol. Or how about the official quarter mile on the C7 being 12.2 is no faster than the CTS v.... Whooptee do....

Point is stating a car is faster... and its not with less power is fine but maybe consider the weight while you are at it.

Sent from the Great White North

 

No such thing as an official time. Every magazine does timing calculations differently.

Posted

No such thing as an official time. Every magazine does timing calculations differently.

Lol. Variance within a tenth or so either way. Quarter mile calculations are standard and corrected to sea level.

 

 

Sent from the Great White North

Posted

What language was that?

LOL. Ok, going to break it down.

Chemical Guys Mr. Pink: Extremely high foaming wash/shampoo

http://www.chemicalguys.com/Chemical_Guys_CWS_402_16_Mr_Pink_Super_Suds_Sha_p/cws_402_16.htm

CG Diablo Wheel Gel 3:1: Chemical Guys Diablo Wheel Gel wheel cleaner diluted 3 parts water to 1 part cleaner

http://www.chemicalguys.com/Chemical_Guys_CLD_997_16_Diablo_Gel_p/cld_997_16.htm

CG Blue Clay Pad: Chemical Guys Blue (light) rubberized clay mitt. Instead of using a traditional clay bar or rubberized clay pad, they made a mitt with no need to use traditional spray lubricant. Just use the wash soap that you still have in your bucket and remove all embedded contaminants within the paint

http://www.chemicalguys.com/Chemical_Guys_CLY_303B_Surface_Cleansing_Mitt_Fi_p/cly_303b.htm

CG V38: Very fine finishing polish from Chemical Guys

http://www.chemicalguys.com/Chemical_Guys_GAP_V38_16_V38_p/gap_v38_16.htm

Hex Logic Pad: Polishing pad that features hexagons in the pad surface pattern to help the polish work into the paint

http://www.chemicalguys.com/Chemical_Guys_BUFX_202_Hex_Logic_Polishing_Hand_p/bufx_202.htm

CG Instawax+: Chemical Guys sprayable carnuba based wax

http://www.chemicalguys.com/Chemical_Guys_WAC_101_16_InstaWax_p/wac_101_16.htm

CG Hybrid V7: Chemical Guys high gloss sealant/quick detailer

http://www.chemicalguys.com/Chemical_Guys_WAC_808_16_Hybrid_V7_1_Gal_p/wac_808_16.htm

Posted

No washing the truck for awhile :(

 

ze3yhy5e.jpg

 

e2yzumy2.jpg

 

 

Ryan

Posted
Took this yesterday Ryan

 

I can't post what I am thinking

 

 

Ryan

Posted

My mom said if I don't have anything nice to say don't say anything at all

 

uhu3e3eh.jpg

 

5uvyqeny.jpg

 

 

Ryan

Posted

You can have that weather and all the terrible things that come with Cali :D

 

 

Sent from the toilet

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • While waiting for parts I have been working on installing the AC compressor, new accumulator, and orifice tube. Also changed out the high side ball valve (original). The orifice tube that was in there wasn't too bad. Slightly dirty, a little bit of junk, but not blocked. Glad I changed it out.   The accumulator, which should have been a 5 minute job, may have just burned $50. Put some PAG in it, wrote the date and mileage on the side, fresh o-rings and gooey'd up the threads and rings with Nylog. Got everything connected and snugged and was going to vacuum down the system, and....   My manifold gauge won't fit on the port. It's not an R12 service port. It LOOKS like an R134 service port but the diameter is a hair too large. There's a sticker on the accumulator that says it's designed to be used with R12 and R134a systems only. So it's not R1234yf. Even if I reduced the diameter slightly with a file, the shoulder on the port is too large so the quick-connect valve won't lock on. I'm stumped. It's going back, and 50/50 on if they'll give me a refund.   Also, I did a fuel pressure test.... Key on, the gauge spikes to about 60psi and quickly bleeds off, like 2psi per second. The fuel isn't going into the plenum, no smell, starts fine, so I'm guessing there's a bad check valve in the pump and the fuel is just draining back into the tank. oh, hell. But, it shouldn't be a problem, pump primes just fine and the truck starts right up. It just means I can't really ever use fuel pressure to verify a leak at the injector or intake.
    • Got this yesterday out of nowhere. Truck is a 25',6.6 gasser with 8k miles.  Only semi anomaly is that the truck had been sitting, uncranked for 6 days. Elec Stability Control showed immediately upon cranking, not while driving. No drivability issues, just the message. Battery didn't seem to be weak when cranking over.  I drove it, killed it, let it sit a few hrs with no avail.  Truck is 100% stock. No damage. 
    • This can be done.  It is not cheap and requires an instrument cluster swap with custom programming, new steering wheel with the controls on it, and a special jumper harness.   The cluster upgrade - 12.3” Digital Cluster Upgrade – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The wheel upgrade - Steering Wheel Upgrade Kit – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The column harness upgrade - 2019 - 2026 Silverado / Sierra: Steering Wheel LIN Bus Harness - Harness Dr. - DIY Done Right     The problem with doing all of this?  You pretty much can't have any programming done to your truck that involves the cluster ever again.  The dealer won't be able to program the cluster as GM's system will only pull data for the cluster the truck came with.  So it would be advised also to turn off over the air updates.   TLDR;  Should have bought an LT double cab?  You'd have a power seat, the wheel controls, the cluster, all things that you've been seeking in your various posts so far about your new WT regular cab.  
    • I was unaware of that, thanks for updating me.
    • Yes.  The 2.7 Turbomax has Active Fuel Management.  It is NOT the same as the V8s.  Totally different system.     Here is an article from GM when the 2.7 came out explaining the cylinder deactivation and the valve lift system.  Starts at the section called "SCS Valvetrain":   New Turbocharged 2.7L 4-Cylinder Engine Powers Full-Size Trucks – TechLink         This is an internet myth going around.  It was alleged that some 5.3s had this mystical 8th digit of the VIN as an "E" which somehow meant it had a new one year only 5.3 that didn't have DFM.  The writer of said article and the person that made the claim conveniently can't count because they posted the VIN.  The 8th digit was a "D" which meant its still the 5.3 with DFM.  The 9th digit of the VIN was an "E" and the 9th digit isn't the engine code.  At all.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...