Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

And to add to that I think the 14-15 silverado is one of the if not the best looking truck ever. So how they went from that to the 16 front end is beyond me. Change is not always a good thing and not always needed. Especially that soon

Posted

I dont like the 2016 sierra much. But I HATE the 2016 silverado. Looks dumb in every trim

That's funny, I LOVE the 2016 Silverado but hate the 2016 Sierra. :)

  • Like 2
Posted

I'm just not feeling the 2016 sierra frontends at all .... they look so bug eyed to me now .... the 14-15 are so much cleaner .... I also thought the 16 silverado frontend was badass in pics but in person they look real busy

The new LED headlights justify any changes they've done. They are amazing, especially with the automatic high-beam.

Posted

Yes I have seen both in person, Silverado and Sierra. Silverado isn't so bad in person, but the Sierra still made me want to kill it with fire [emoji16]

Haha they've both really grown on me.

Posted

I love the new look on both Silverado and Sierra! Bold move to continue to leave competition in the dust!

I don't think it's justifiable enough to go trade my truck in but refinately like the changes. If anyone had a doubt an F150 being better looking you can scratch that right about .... Now!

Posted

My 2014 Silverado 1500. Rough country 3.5 level with A arms. American force wheels independence 22x10 -24 offset. Atturo trail blade mud tires 33s. No rubbing, trimming, shaving or hammering. Go recon led tails. Go recon third brake light.Rigid industries fogs and grille. Morimoto 6000k hid kit in the heads. 5% tint all the way around. Fully custom audio system. 2 JL Audio 8w7 anniversary editions in a custom ported box. All hertz hi energy door speakers and tweeters. Jl and Rockford amps. Sounds unbelievable. Fog light mod. And driver assist handle. Spod wireless accessory controller with Bluetooth. Tactical covering seat covers. And some paint matched bow ties.

Add me Instagram user kajun504

 

 

de1ee6ef6b3d5bd091bb0f433b58a145.jpg9973bca85d29d8940886bf9f06d6ea47.jpg

 

 

iPhone 6 '14 Silverado

  • Like 10
Posted

And to add to that I think the 14-15 silverado is one of the if not the best looking truck ever.

I have to respectfully disagree. The 88-99 Silverado is still the best looking truck ever.

 

 

Fat fingered, and shot from the hip.

Posted

I love the new look on both Silverado and Sierra! Bold move to continue to leave competition in the dust!

I don't think it's justifiable enough to go trade my truck in but refinately like the changes. If anyone had a doubt an F150 being better looking you can scratch that right about .... Now!

Posted

I love the new look on both Silverado and Sierra! Bold move to continue to leave competition in the dust!

I don't think it's justifiable enough to go trade my truck in but refinately like the changes. If anyone had a doubt an F150 being better looking you can scratch that right about .... Now!

 

I think the new F-150 looks like it's trying too hard to look bold. Like when the Tundra tried to add the look of a bigger grill by adding a chunky chrome strip across the front edge of the hood. :crackup::nonod:

Posted

New Sierra definitely growing on me.

 

My favorite is early '90s F150's. 1993-96. I really liked my 2001 Silverado, too, but it paled in comparison with this one.

Posted

Installed Fox 2.0 coilovers and BFG's this weekend.

post-151833-0-34465800-1450810489_thumb.jpg

post-151833-0-34465800-1450810489_thumb.jpg

post-151833-0-34465800-1450810489_thumb.jpg

post-151833-0-34465800-1450810489_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

Installed Fox 2.0 coilovers and BFG's this weekend.

How much of a lift does the Fox coilovers provide? Is that the only adjustment you have done to your front-end?

Posted

The Fox coilover gives 2". Right when I installed it was about 2-1/2" but it settled over time. The picture looks a little nose high, but my driveway slopes up. It is dead level. It is the only adjustment I have made to the truck. May add some rear blocks as i do tow a trailer and a boat on occasion.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...