Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Traded in my 2014 this week and got a pic from my buddy at the dealership of my new 2015 CC LT Z71 today!

Here she is!
They moved my brand new tires over and leveled it for me.

FCBC4F90-3306-4009-B659-F53C69A213AB_1.j

  • Like 2
Posted

Traded in my 2014 this week and got a pic from my buddy at the dealership of my new 2015 CC LT Z71 today!

 

Here she is!

They moved my brand new tires over and leveled it for me.

 

FCBC4F90-3306-4009-B659-F53C69A213AB_1.j

 

Why did you trade? Looks to be pretty much the same truck. Were you having problems with the old one? Were you able to take off the grill guard and steps for your new one? Still love those wheels, going to be nice when I put a larger tire and small level on mine when the stockers wear out.

 

Tyler

Posted (edited)

 

Why did you trade? Looks to be pretty much the same truck. Were you having problems with the old one? Were you able to take off the grill guard and steps for your new one? Still love those wheels, going to be nice when I put a larger tire and small level on mine when the stockers wear out.

 

Tyler

My wife and I both got new cars. No problems with mine, just got a new one. I put quite a few miles on it this year with mountain bike races I was driving to throughout the summer...

I was able to keep the running boards, grill guard and rubber bed mat. He told me to take off anything I wanted to keep since it wouldn't add to the value of the trade at all. He also knew I just bought those new tires, and since he was a buddy of mine he helped me get them put on the new truck.

 

So that is the truck as it sits right now with a 2" level and 275/70/18 BFG KO2's

 

I'll post pics as i get the grill guard and running boards on. And I should be getting a camper shell in a couple of months for it as well.

Edited by tyrich88
Posted

 

2" level on the front? No problems/rubbing with the 275/65's? I am looking at this setup for myself.

On ocassion it rubs the carpet liner on full lock turns. Not a big issue and pulling them back some would take care of it. Nothing important rubs tho. Clears sway bar fine and control arms etc no problems.

Posted

9fa5bee1f8f097515589245f647751e0.jpg

 

My brother ended up trading his 6 MO old 15 Colorado on a Silverado yesterday. The Colorado was perfect but too small for him...

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

6acb81e9004d0144c8598777819c7d42.jpg

 

Don't know who's this is but it sure is purdy:)

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

That's beautiful

 

2014 Silverado 2WT CC Summit White 4.3L V6

DROPKICK Edition

IG: jorge_dropkick_rangel

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...