Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Very nice. Did you do it locally?

Yes I had my mechanic do it for me at his shop. This isn't their specialty, they are a repair shop

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Hey guys. For those of you who have removed your rear block. Did the truck still have a rake? Ive seen anywhere from 1" to 2". I have a rc 2.5" lift on my truck. Is uses a larger rear block, a lower 2" strut spacer and a .5" top strut spacer. My idea is to use the front .5" spacer and no rear block and hoping it come out level. Should have a sporty stance to it.

Posted

The block is 1.25 thick. Rc have almost 4" rake and I think ec and cc have little over 3"

Posted

Mcgaughy's 5/7 sitting more like 5/8. I have always liked the slammed look with stock 16" or 17" wheels, not sure why lol. Do you guys think I need to bring the rear up an inch or leave it alone? Thanks for looking.

7583693B-5B50-4333-888A-AE23C4ADBD3E_zps

58C5E67B-D7DE-4ED6-9A68-3185DB22A37C_zps

FEDBA2C1-BF2A-42DC-BDEF-60708A93188A_zps

66924397-BFC7-4E2B-BD27-2514E822B79D_zps

  • Like 2
Posted

Mcgaughy's 5/7 sitting more like 5/8. I have always liked the slammed look with stock 16" or 17" wheels, not sure why lol. Do you guys think I need to bring the rear up an inch or leave it alone? Thanks for looking.

 

I've been looking at that 5/7 kit for my truck. I think a lot of these look great with that drop, but some look like they squat a little in the rear. Yours may be one of those. Kind of hard to tell in the pics. One pic looks like it, but the other doesn't. I'd say raise it up an inch w/a jack and see if you like it better. I personally would want a little rake instead of a squat, if I had to choose.

 

Other than that, how do you like the kit? Did you install it yourself or have someone do it?

  • Like 1
Posted

I have the same kit on my rc. It's set at 3/6 right now. But I'm adjusting it to 4/7 soon. Rides better than stock I thin . But I got a bilstein shock instead of the mcg shock

  • Like 1
Posted

I've been looking at that 5/7 kit for my truck. I think a lot of these look great with that drop, but some look like they squat a little in the rear. Yours may be one of those. Kind of hard to tell in the pics. One pic looks like it, but the other doesn't. I'd say raise it up an inch w/a jack and see if you like it better. I personally would want a little rake instead of a squat, if I had to choose.

 

Other than that, how do you like the kit? Did you install it yourself or have someone do it?

 

The truck rides amazing, I have heard people say the mcguaghys rear shocks ride horrible but I don't think so at all. A buddy of mine installed the kit for me as well as the c-notch. I have worked on a lot of car suspensions but not on trucks so I didn't feel comfortable doing it.

 

As far as the rake goes it measures out a 1/2 inch higher in the rear so there is a slight rake but I think I am going to lift the back up 1" so the rake is more noticeable so it doesn't look saggy in the rear.

  • Like 2
Posted

Keep in mind the rear fender is lower in the rear than front by almost an inch if my calculations are correct.

  • Like 2
Posted

Keep in mind the rear fender is lower in the rear than front by almost an inch if my calculations are correct.

 

 

True, and I think that exaggerates the sagging look.

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi all. Curious if anyone has done the mcgaughys flip kit with a lift hanger. Looking for 6" total rear drop on a 4x4 rcsb.

Do you reuse the factory shackle?

It's currently got 2" drop shackles and a block delete, but the 2" leaf spring won't quite get me to the drop I'm looking for. Was thinking about a 2/5 but would rather do a 3/6. I don't want to regret not going low enough, so why not do the drop I want?

Posted

You would use the lift hanger and a drop shackle.

I am at a 3/6 right now and I'm going lower

Posted

You would use the lift hanger and a drop shackle.

I am at a 3/6 right now and I'm going lower

Meh. Factory hangers are riveted in IIRC and I don't really want to hack em out with the torches. Shame..maybe Ill just stick with a 2/5 or 3/5

Posted

The only way to achieve over 4 in the rear without doing the hanger is to get a lowering leaf with the lowering shackle

Posted

The only way to achieve over 4 in the rear without doing the hanger is to get a lowering leaf with the lowering shackle

Yeah it should end up at 5.25 in the rear. shackles, leafs, and no blocks. Going to use the front adjustable mcgaughy struts to do somewhere between a 2-3. Will let you know how it turns out!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,978
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    rayredbone
    Newest Member
    rayredbone
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 510 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
    • Thank You.   So far my new ride is making me look like a genius for going with the 3.0L, as my first fuel refill occurred over three weeks from when I took delivery.  This engine combination is very amazing.  So far no issues and had not done a regen yet.
    • I am curious as to how much fluid you put back in the transmission ( assuming you had replaced the filter to compare to my findings ) and then went through the process of warming up the trans before pulling the check plug to drain out the excess and if you measured how much came back out.    I just found it surprising that some claimed a certain amount less fluid being put in and then draining some back out. The attitude of the truck as per if the surface is level and how the trucks stance is would make quite a difference since the check plug is right at the front of the transmission. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...