Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello, new to this forum as I recently purchased a 2014 Silverado LTZ. I have noticed my normal engine temperature is about 210 degrees, which is higher than any vehicle I have owned previously. Is this what I should expect or am I running hot?

 

Joe M.

Posted

My gauge says 210 but digital says about 195.

Posted

My 12 reads the same. Not sure its an exact representation of the operating temp. The thermostat appears to be 195 degrees F? Though GM shows 194 degrees F.

Posted

Every gm vehicle I have ever owned has run at 210 it's normal

 

 

Ryan

Posted (edited)

I noticed that starting with 2007 all trucks that I test drove, including the one we have at work(2012 ), had the needle exactly in the middle of the temperature gauge field when warmed up. My truck ('06) normal temperature is slightly less than that as indicated by the temperature gauge.

Edited by pm26
  • 6 years later...
Posted (edited)

Is it normal for the temp gauge to fluctuate?

temp in picture is from idling and revving in park up to 3-4000 rpm with outside temp being 20deg C. It also climbs when accelerating up hill with no load at same outside temp of 20deg C...it does go back to a needle width below 100 right after 

called dealer, said it’s normal up to 120deg C. Anyone experience this?

2018 Silverado 5.3 with 27000km

8FC35A0B-7477-49AF-92CD-95BC4C9DFC7E.jpeg

Edited by Paul_’18 Silverado
Posted

Yes, that is technically normal.

 

The actual temp and the cluster will differ some, it's been that way on the 1999-2018 trucks. The newest trucks seems to be much more accurate.

 

The stock thermostat should hold the temp around 93-105 C or 200-220 degrees F. The fan kicks on at 221F or 105C. The dealership saying it's normal to see up to 120deg C is not right, it would be over heating by then and probably boiling the coolant.

 

Hook up a scan tool if you want to see the real coolant temp from the sensor on the engine.

Posted (edited)

I have a infrared thermometer, I did check the thermostat and where the needle was in the picture, my reading at highest was 96deg C. 
I agree that 120 is too hot, but why does it fluctuate that way and why just why, if the Obd temp is different than what I see, if I didn’t know any better, I’d be taking the truck in for a ghost problem thinning my pocket for non warranty covered diagnostics, I have never had this with any other truck I’ve owned. 

anyway, I’m at the point of doubt with this truck, between this and down shift clunk rough drive train, thin paint that chips easily, fuel saving gimmicks on a truck, cheap fisher price plastic dash and interior that creaks, rattles fastened by push clips...I don’t accept “within Spec” or “normal” according to gm anymore.

Very disappointed with this $ 60000 truck, should’ve gotten that FORD I had my eye on.

also the dealer we purchased from(not the dealer we use for service)  had us sign a non resale clause or something to that effect,  that would blacklist us with gm on future purchases should we sell our truck to the us market. At this point do I really care!? First and last gm I purchase .

also, why does gm canada and gm us have different tsb bulletins for the same common  issues on these trucks.

Not bad grammar, it wasn’t a question...
 

 

 

Edited by Paul_’18 Silverado
Posted

As you know in many cases the price you pay means nothing now. The $30,000 truck is going down the same line that the $60,000 truck is. Everything but the interior and exterior packages is basically the same. Paint, engine, transmission on either of those trucks will have the same issues.

 

Even on other brands, people like you and me would find stuff to complain about. They all have quality issues and everything has to meet the same emissions requirements so there will be no getting away from those features.

 

This is why I don't buy new trucks, I let someone take the 20-40% hit and I pick it up for way cheaper 2-3 years later.

Posted (edited)

120* C (248*F) won’t be overheating on these things, though is close. Pressure and coolant mix raise the boiling point up to around 260*F IIRC. The dealer is quoting a worst case scenario on that temp and I do agree if temp is getting that high there’s other issues to deal with. 

 

If it helps assuage any buyers remorse, I’ve worked on enough Fords, all with the same exact issues (failed timing chain tensioners and guides), to never own one ever again. But I also expect 300k miles without issue. I only buy used, sometimes over 100k miles; I’ll let the original owner take the financial hit and then I’ll still have a reliable, clean vehicle for hundreds of thousands of miles for a fraction of the price. 

 

You paid $60k for added comfort not added durability, so I’d reckon that aspect has been fulfilled. If that is too much, or the just wasn’t worth the squeeze, trade it in for a cheaper truck, or one from another brand, but don’t expect perfection. Emissions and fuel economy requirements have upped engine temps, leaned the fuel mix, and added miles of electronic complexity. At least these trucks don’t have their fuel pump driver module circuit board cleverly hidden inside a sacrificial metal case and mounted above the rear axle, like a Ford... mine went through 3 of those in 150k miles at $100 a piece. 

Edited by 16LT4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I agree with this assessment. As you know I’m testing longevity with vehicles for the first time. I have a few vehicles I passed to kids and grandkids. We’re all past 100K miles some approaching 170K. I’m the only one doing 5k oil changes. The rest whatever the minder says. I’m the only one doing frequent transmission service. My odyssey the trip vehicle at 200K will be finished as a trip vehicle. I recently changed to high mileage oil, Valvoline. I can’t get past the fact that all manufacturers want to claim long service life. I just don’t make sense that they would go with low weight oil for mileage. While sacrificing longevity.
    • There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
    • 1Based on independent testing of OE 0W-20 in the Peugeot TU3M Wear Test as required by the dexos1 Gen 2 specification.
    • oh ya that's good to know - I would rather use a gear than the brakes down a long hill.  I would not let cruise control take over on snow or towing a trailer for sure on hills anyway.     The other thing about the CO trip was that was all done above 6K feet for the most part, so that has to use more gas as the motor is down a good amount of power up there.   If I drove my 2016 Camaro with a very similar V8 to this 6.6 it would probably get about 23-24 on the fast run up to NE.  But the premium fuel premium is steep here in CO, so it would still only save about $40 in overall costs for the round-trip.  And you sure can't carry much gear in a convertible camaro!
    • Got part #s of what you ordered vs what you got?  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...