Jump to content

Pricing and cab choice


Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been looking for a new truck and have decided to go with a 2014 Sierra 1500 but am amazed at the $4000 dollar price difference between a double cab and a crew cab base price. I wonder how many more crew cabs are sold than double cabs.

Posted

Dang it did not notice that I thought if you did not spend at least 51k you just got a metal box with a milk crate for a seat? Haha I kinda wish I had went with the double cab with standard bed instead of the Crew with short bed. Can hardly haul a sack of peanuts in this little short bed. Go with the savings and the double cab unless you are constantly hauling your big ole hooligans in the back seats.

Posted

The crew cab is well worth the extra room in the back seat. It's like night and day. Also for the 50th time THEY MAKE THE 6.5FT BED IN THE CREW CAB... janyga2y.jpg

Posted

crew cab is better. More room and better comfort. My kids and buddies love it. I the short bed which I prefer and don't need the 6.5ft bed since I have a really nice trailer to tow with. Double cab just look weird to me too.

Posted

Why not get an SUV?

 

I like my american assembled double cab. It has the room when necessary. And puts a limit on passenger size.

Posted

All depends on what you need. I definitely don't need more than a double cab for what/who I haul. For me, the extra truck length made me concerned about the maneuverability, especially with how tight parking lots are these days.

 

There's no right or wrong choice here. If you need the space, it's worth the money. As for "american assembled" being a benefit of double cab, I think GM's QC at the Mexico facility is just as tight as the U.S. plants.

 

Why not get an SUV?

I like my american assembled double cab. It has the room when necessary. And puts a limit on passenger size.

LOL. Is this your attempt at keeping your family's weight under control?

Posted

I honestly wish I got a crew cab. Go with that and be happy with the extra space. I went with the double cab, because it was less expensive, but looking back I would have ponied up the extra dough.

Posted

We are so spoiled today, there was 6 of us growing up in the 60s. Dad had a 2 door truck that's all you could get. Family car was a 2 door, Dad wouldn't be seen in a 4 door. When the car broke down we jam in the truck, some of us got in the bed, heaven forbid. No AC, Am radio, roll up windows, hub caps. Its a wonder we lived. Spend more money so the people in back are more comfey, hell let them walk. Buy what you want.

Posted

 

 

There's no right or wrong choice here. If you need the space, it's worth the money. As for "american assembled" being a benefit of double cab, I think GM's QC at the Mexico facility is just as tight as the U.S. plants.

 

Hmmmm 4 grand less and made in Indiana vs. Mexico. Mexican workers are paid less than Americans. So these trade agreements that were supposed to create jobs don't result in savings for the consumer? I wonder why unemployment is so high in the U.S. Must be a coincidence. I'll opt for a smaller back seat that is rarely used and hope that a kid in Indiana has a Merry Christmas.

Posted

Thanks for all the input. I have looked at both cabs and both Chevy and GMC. I like the GMC more but ran into a Chevy 6.2 topaz blue crew cab that I am negotiating on so we will see.

Posted

Thanks for all the input. I have looked at both cabs and both Chevy and GMC. I like the GMC more but ran into a Chevy 6.2 topaz blue crew cab that I am negotiating on so we will see.

Good luck on the negotiations. Whatever you get, you'll enjoy it!

Posted

You thank us now, until that first payment is due, or your account gets drained.....lol

 

Blue Topaz with a 6.2 is a real looker. I haven't seen too many in that color....real sharp.

 

Hopefully you'll get a good deal and can enjoy.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 307 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...