Jump to content

GM drops the ball on seat belt guides. Really?


Recommended Posts

Posted

So I took a friends 12 year old for a ride the other day and realized the seat belt in the back of the truck was pretty much coming across her chin. So I looked for the guide that keeps it lower for younger people and shorter people if needed. Not there. Its in the manual, the mounting location is there... so I ask customer assistance if it was forgotten since all of my other crew cabs had these standard. Hell on a $56,000 truck, it should have them for the safety aspect alone let alone for the cost.
So I order these from my dealer, its $5 a piece. I ask GM to cover the cost or give me a credit for a future accessory or something... I get the run around for over a week, the entire time they are trying to get the dealership to eat the cost on them vs just handling it.
really? What a joke. way to sour a purchase for $10... hell even if they had even made an attempt to do something... but no.. bother the dealer with this stuff.

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

yep they come with crew is what I was told but not extended - do not know how true that is but went and took them out of my old truck as they were better than the ones they wanted to sell me

Posted

I have a crew and they aren't in it...
If I had known I would have pulled the ones in the truck I traded.

Posted

Does seem strange. The back seat is where kids are supposed to go after all. Given how long GM had to develop these trucks I honestly expected better myself. But I see no other fullsize options that are viable so next year I'll be buying one anyhow. :lol:

Posted

Well, now at least we know the part number and obviously, your parts guy can get them. When I purchased my truck, I had to get help from GM Customer Service on here to help me with the part number because the dealer parts guy couldn't figure out how to get them. I even copied the page in the Owner's Manual for the parts guy to reference and he is usually pretty good. Ridiculous.

Posted

They are not with the crew cabs either, mine didn't have them.

Posted

Here's a copy of my post with details...Rear seat comfort guides holds the seat belt off of your shoulder. My DC did not come with the rear seat belt comfort guides. Dealer parts guy said the CC models do and was surprised that my DC didn't. I gave him a copy of the pages from the Owner's Manual to show him what they look like. He then tried to order them. They came in with pins on the end instead of the clip needed for the DC (these are the type for the CC). Contacted GM Customer Care through the forum. Jennifer provided part no. 20944862. My dealer parts guy ordered them for me. He also said there is another style with a pin on the end instead of the clip.

Here's the comfort guide, from the owner's manual:
buqu8e9e.jpg


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HDSent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Posted

I have the part numbers if anyone needs them. completely happy with my truck up to this point, except for this fact. shame $10 is souring the whole thing. Its the principle more than the money

Posted

Does seem strange. The back seat is where kids are supposed to go after all. Given how long GM had to develop these trucks I honestly expected better myself. But I see no other fullsize options that are viable so next year I'll be buying one anyhow. :lol:

 

Heck, I thought they got stuck in the bed? It is where they stuck us as kids. Hmmm maybe this explains some things... :dunno:

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

GM tried to get the dealer I bought the parts from to cover them, BS then wanted my selling dealer to cover them.. i didnt give up that info because I dont think my dealer should be harassed over $10 in parts that should be in my 56,000 truck.
still waiting to hear back on their final decision.
sad really

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

after some arguing and such and some emails, GM is refunding me the $10 I paid for these to put in my truck. Doubt that will be the norm for anyone else, but I didnt let up because it was a matter of principle to me.
to others, good luck.

Posted

What a thing to cheap out on. I get why they ditch floor lighting or rear vents but there is essentially no savings by pulling these. At least with the other stuff they presumably save on wiring, light fixtures, etc. I don't even have kids and I'd be pissed if I had to buy those as now and then I do have friends kids in the back if I get suckered into driving.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...