Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Still love mine...and again I talked to Bilstein and they said they didn't reccomend the 5100s on the factory ride settings (bottomed out) that's why they make the 4600. The truck now feels really close to the way my Avalanche and my wife's Tahoe ride, I'm sure the Ranchos ride well too.

  • Like 1
Posted

Part number for the quick lift you want is RS999901

 

Yes.. you can adjust the firmness of the struts.... but not the height.

  • Like 1
Posted

Everyone will have their own preference but I went from Ranchos, (AT package) to stock oem non AT then to Bilsteins w/ max height in front and it's not even close IMO that the Bilsteins are far superior. Not "bouncy" over bumps but not stiff either.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Yeah, thats the exact thing that drove me nuts with mine as well. I have the Max Tow and it felt like the back was really stiff but the front would float alot, the bilsteins fixed that. I think it rides alot better, they should have put these shocks on from the factory in my opinion. Let me know how your aligment looks, I am still debating on doing it just for peace of mind.

Had my truck aligned today. They said it wasn't out enough for me to notice, but it was out a little and would have affected tire wear some so I'm glad I had it checked. It was worth the 50 bucks I think!
  • Like 1
Posted

Just finished my install of a set of 5100s. I set the front shocks at their upper most position and installed a 1/4" spacer under the bottom of the front shocks. I ended up with 2" of lift at the center line of the front wheels and the ride is just as comfortable as it was stock. The truck seems to handle a bit better in the curves and that 57 Buick Special feeling is gone. I had already installed an extra 1" of lift on the rear necessitated when I installed some Firestone air bags for towing my car trailer. Now the top of front fender well is 39" off the ground and the top of the rear fender well is 40". Totally happy with the truck's stance and ride.

  • Like 1
Posted

Just finished my install of a set of 5100s. I set the front shocks at their upper most position and installed a 1/4" spacer under the bottom of the front shocks. I ended up with 2" of lift at the center line of the front wheels and the ride is just as comfortable as it was stock. The truck seems to handle a bit better in the curves and that 57 Buick Special feeling is gone. I had already installed an extra 1" of lift on the rear necessitated when I installed some Firestone air bags for towing my car trailer. Now the top of front fender well is 39" off the ground and the top of the rear fender well is 40". Totally happy with the truck's stance and ride.

I noticed that my truck handled better as well. I think it just tightened up the ride which I like. Agree completely on the 57 Buick comment!

  • Like 2
Posted

Here is the before and after on the Bilstein install. After picture includes 275/70/18 Hankook Dynapro atm. The truck rides great and is almost perfectly level. I think I have about .25" in rake. I may install a rear block later if the rear drops too much with a small load or towing a boat.

post-139593-0-38799300-1424321430_thumb.jpg

post-139593-0-87275100-1424321445_thumb.jpg

post-139593-0-38799300-1424321430_thumb.jpg

post-139593-0-87275100-1424321445_thumb.jpg

post-139593-0-38799300-1424321430_thumb.jpg

post-139593-0-87275100-1424321445_thumb.jpg

post-139593-0-38799300-1424321430_thumb.jpg

post-139593-0-87275100-1424321445_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

Here is the before and after on the Bilstein install. After picture includes 275/70/18 Hankook Dynapro atm. The truck rides great and is almost perfectly level. I think I have about .25" in rake. I may install a rear block later if the rear drops too much with a small load or towing a boat.

 

You go with the max setting?

Posted (edited)

Here is the before and after on the Bilstein install. After picture includes 275/70/18 Hankook Dynapro atm. The truck rides great and is almost perfectly level. I think I have about .25" in rake. I may install a rear block later if the rear drops too much with a small load or towing a boat.

It's funny that you posted this last night, I just got the same tires yesterday! Pics to follow

Edited by mtbsam
Posted

Esexton, your truck looks great, a .75 inch block in the rear would be plenty and you wouldnt have to go with a longer rear shock, I may do that. The handling and ride quality is much improved compared to the stock shocks. This is one of the best upgrades a person can do to a basic truck, if you have factory Ranchos I cant see it being worth the almost $450 total for shocks and labor. In my case the factory Black Shocks Sucked at under 14000 miles, and needed upgraded, West Virginia roads are rough and right now snow covered and getting worse daily. Next to buy some tires like esexton's :)

Posted (edited)

Don't think for 1min. that those Rancho shocks that come on the truck are any better then the junk OEM shocks! Both suck!

Edited by SMiller
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Here is my truck before and after the upgrades. Unfortunately it's filthy and the photos weren't taken in the same setting for comparison. I think the difference is obvious!

 

post-39512-142438343775_thumb.jpeg

f15f0eeca755ed0e3ca1662a4a17f00d.jpg

post-39512-142438344128_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438344708_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438343775_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438344128_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438344708_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438343775_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438344128_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438344708_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438343775_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438344128_thumb.jpeg

post-39512-142438344708_thumb.jpeg

Edited by mtbsam
  • Like 1
Posted

Don't think for 1min. that those Rancho shocks that come on the truck are any better then the just OEM shocks! Both suck!

 

+1 on that...I really am not happy with my Rancho's. Can't wait to get these on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,867 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...