Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This needs to be a sticky because holy hell it made such a massive difference fixing that freaking pedal bracket flex!!!!

 

It drives like a totally different truck!

 

Side note, what the F were they thinking with that design?! Big TY to OP & the replies. This plus disabling AFM has made me soooo much more satisfied with the truck. My thoughts on a tune are now on the back burner, I honestly have darn near no complaints with the shifting & throttle response now, before these 2 simple mods it was almost scary to drive sometimes due to the hesitation & unpredictable, lazy pedal.

Posted

I just got a 2016 crew cab and the gas pedal bracket in mine had a lot of slop in it like has been reported here. It was frustrating to drive as I would push on the gas pedal and get little to no response. Driveability was pretty poor in my opinion. I put a piece of hard rubber matting under the bracket and the throttle response is much improved and much more consistent.

 

I have no idea why GM hasn't addressed this simple issue in the 3rd model year. If they want the throttle to respond slowly for enhanced fuel economy, it seems to me that should be done in the throttle mapping and not by having the accelerator bracket have a half inch of slop in it.

Posted

WOW. I am glad I saw this thread.

 

My 2014 was a little sluggish off the line. It felt like I had to REALLY push in the pedal...

 

Just went out to check and I probably had a MINIMUM of 1/2" of Flex.

 

I ended up cutting up a wooden shim. I pulled the gas pedal as far as I could towards the driver seat. Then I stuck the wooden shim behind the plastic bracket...

 

Made a HUGE difference. No more sluggishness. I greatly appreciate the OP for making this thread.

Posted

I installed the shim on mine also. Definitely an improvement in throttle response with out the flex.

Posted (edited)

I just got a 2016 crew cab and the gas pedal bracket in mine had a lot of slop in it like has been reported here. It was frustrating to drive as I would push on the gas pedal and get little to no response. Driveability was pretty poor in my opinion. I put a piece of hard rubber matting under the bracket and the throttle response is much improved and much more consistent.

 

I have no idea why GM hasn't addressed this simple issue in the 3rd model year. If they want the throttle to respond slowly for enhanced fuel economy, it seems to me that should be done in the throttle mapping and not by having the accelerator bracket have a half inch of slop in it.

GM didn't intentionally design the bracket to flex for improved fuel economy. It's just a cheap design that allows flex and hampers accurate throttle control. The true source of the unresponsive throttle is the drive-by-wire system in conjunction with torque management:

 

"The 5.3L, and 6.2L suffers from poor throttle response down low. In fact the factory programming has limits on the max throttle blade opening that PCM allows and is based on RPM range engine is operating in. By correcting this issue and a few others; improvements will be much better throttle response, step on go pedal, vehicle will respond quickerthis DBW system is a torque driven system, it works by taking a certain amount of torque via engine and wheel and applies it to what the driver foot say it needs; a better way to explain it is its a torque limiter. It only allows so much torque at a given pedal position. Stock tables are conservative and numb at best and thats why one would feel some times a lag or a goofy pedal with DBW systems. For a 5.3L, or 6.2L V8 this is one of the most critical areas that must be addressed and modified to generate more torque /hp and throttle response."http://5startuning.com/got-a-gmgmc/

 

The pedal flex eliminates some of the vagueness of the throttle but only a tuner can make your truck truly reponsive and "torquey" off the line.

Edited by HondaHawkGT
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Same issues with my 2015 Silverado z71 5.3 it had about 1/2" of movement so I took a shim cut it and barley got it to fit ünder the plastic. whatever they used for the sound deadening was right up almost under the plastic they should have kept going with it then I wouldn't have had to put a shim. I did notice it now flexes some at the top when you push the peddle but I don't think it will matter that much other then that truck definitely responds better

Posted

This is the video I shot this afternoon. Hopefully you can see the flex of the bracket. Sorry for the poor quality of the video. First one I have done.

 

 

 

But is it not flexing as your pulling on it, not pushing it down?

Posted

 

But is it not flexing as your pulling on it, not pushing it down?

Exactly...checked mine no flex when pushing only when pulling it up. Bracket sits firmly on the firewall

Posted

I found that on my adjustable petals there was also flex in the large plastic bracket the pedal assembly sits in. It was making a terrible plastic torsion sound at certain temperatures. I used some left over EPDM rubber roofing material on the side of the bracket, literally just folding it and stuffing it in, and it seems to stiffen it up quite a bit. I am hoping the sound/torsion is mostly gone.

 

The small things....

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I hesitated to post this but figured I might as well as it's at least mildly related. I noticed today that the throttle response on my truck is very dependent on my foot placement on the gas pedal. I tend to keep my heel between the gas pedal and brake which lets me rotate the top of my foot between the gas pedal and brake. This basically means that I'm pushing on the bottom of the gas pedal. I happened to put my whole foot on the gas pedal in basically a vertical orientation and the throttle is much more responsive.

 

I've probably driven this way my whole life and never noticed that any of my cars were sensitive in this manner. My truck only has 400 miles on it but the throttle response has always seemed very slow unless I really pushed on the pedal. With my foot position adjusted, the throttle feels a lot more responsive. I feel a little goofy writing this but figured it couldn't hurt to throw it out there.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I came across this thread because my gas pedal is making a horrible squeaking/creaking noise. I noticed the flex while I was down there checking out the noise. Has anyone else had a noise associated with this issue?

Posted

I came across this thread because my gas pedal is making a horrible squeaking/creaking noise. I noticed the flex while I was down there checking out the noise. Has anyone else had a noise associated with this issue?

I noticed this, it drives me nuts, I haven't fully solved the noise that is often associated with certain temperatures for me. I did put a shim to reduce flex, but I still sometimes get the creaking noise.

Posted

I noticed this, it drives me nuts, I haven't fully solved the noise that is often associated with certain temperatures for me. I did put a shim to reduce flex, but I still sometimes get the creaking noise.

I'm going to the dealer on Thursday to get it looked at. I will let you know what they say.
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I'm going to the dealer on Thursday to get it looked at. I will let you know what they say.

 

Mine just started making that groaning noise too. It looks like it's coming from the pedal pivot point, I sprayed it with a little wd40, I'll see if there's any improvement next time I drive it. Yeah, it's annoying.

 

Update: Save yourself the aggravation or trip to the dealer, problem solved with a quick squirt of WD40.

Edited by beetle

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,960
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    doylej24
    Newest Member
    doylej24
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 664 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Ok I missed that part that yours is a GM. The strange part is that the choice for year ranges and within the year of 2026 is different on the Sierra then on the Chev for some reason as I am looking at my tool at the Sierra choices. Now I am guessing you see as to your sensor part number as it may be different on your truck for some reason and a call to GM should get you the part model number of the sensors you should have as well as which MHz your sensors are. I know mine are the ones as per what I listed but there are other choices in the Autel and got me wondering if by some chance they put different ones in your truck. Having said that, did you try using each of the choices starting from No 1 and going on down the list, not sure if that would mean shutting off the engine each time and resetting the tool and going at it again each time. Also I thought of something else which may sound retarded but if there was some stupid chance that the chev choice would work. The reason I say that is that the Sierra is showing a range up to 06/2026 for the various choices of sensors it could be where as the Chev has one choice that has that 12/2026. By the way it is possible to not run the truck and you may know that as per not pressing the brake but pressing and holding the start button for a few seconds and it lights up the dash ( its called service mode ) but that sucks battery power and if it were me doing it that way I would be throwing on a decent sized battery charger before doing it that way as killing your battery won't make you happy at me at all !.    Like I say, just a thought to try the Chev choices if you have already exhausted the Sierra choices but first it would be nice to know for sure what exact sensor model and hertz your truck uses as I assume only those choices that mention the sensor would work unless a choice that does not mention the sensor model would somehow work. Its frustrating when one is trying to use tools like this without the experience of the tool and the vehicle, as I am sure dealer techs themselves struggle with it when starting out or a new model year comes along that is slightly different. 
    • I tried before I updated the scan tool just incase an update messed it up, but it never worked so I updated the scan tool and it still didn't work.   Only difference is I click on Sierra not Chevrolet cause I have a Sierra.   If I click on 2026-2024 I didn't have any option to change placard, when I click on 2023 it does give me the option but when I try to do it,.it says vehicle not supported!   I have my region or market or whatever it is set to America I think, is that what yours is set to?
    • Its just that it worked on 2024 trucks on this forum and my 2025 model truck, unless GM did something since that point to screw up access or Autel has a bad update. I haven't had need to use my tool since last year when I did the changes to the placard pressure settings and since then I updated the software on my Autel but have not plugged into the OBD so hard to say if I would get a surprise as well.    All I know last year when I bought the Autel I was warned to be sure to update it before I tried using the unit as they said who knows how long ago unit itself was actually manufactured as the software could be way out of date. 
    • And so you had gone through the process of registering and updating the tool and so on ?. All I can say is that on the front page as the tool fires up you go to advanced mode, then vehicle model comes up and you choose Silverado ( not the DRW or EV  since your a single rear wheel ) , then I think its choice 2 which is 07/2021 - 12/2026 ( 433mhz 13542523 ) as that is the series of tpms sensors and then go down to choice 5 which is tire type/pressure selection. Hit yes and it says to connect to OBD port and turn ignition on.    Having said this, I updated the software in my tool lately and these year range choices look different from the past due to them doing some updates it would appear and I have not connected up to the OBD port since last year so hopefully I am not in for a surprise with them screwing up the software and that it won't work on my truck anymore either.    So my question is, when you plugged into the OBD and started your truck it had that message on the Autel screen "vehicle not supported" ?. That does seem odd as tire shops would be pissed right off if hey can't use their tool on the model year after mine that in theory is supposed to be much the same truck ... unless GM did some change in the computer system to block certain things from access. 
    • Understanding and using modern scan tools is its own body of knowledge. I had little hope that would work...programming access to the BCM is probably required and that is not easy for us consumers. Expensive scan tool, GM programming subscription, online authentication, etc.   It also may be a matter of finding the right dealer to program it for you. Flashing a modern BCM might be a little too advanced for most tire shops.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...