Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

That's why I'm working building a meth/alky kit in the next few months. I figure it and the catch can will be great with a future tune.

 

For a temporary setup run the hose from your winshield washer to the place you're going to inject it. I'd just put a washer nozzle in the plastic duct in front of the throttle body. Solder or squash the orifice down to about .060 and be done. You can control it with the washer switch. Pull the wiper fuse. Heck, you can shoot the blue juice in there and get good results. It's mostly water and alcohol.

Edited by spurshot
Posted

 

For a temporary setup run the hose from your winshield washer to the place you're going to inject it. I'd just put a washer nozzle in the plastic duct in front of the throttle body. Solder or squash the orifice down to about .060 and be done. You can control it with the washer switch. Pull the wiper fuse. Heck, you can shoot the blue juice in there and get good results. It's mostly water and alcohol.

 

That's definitely simplistic...

 

The good thing is that with the AFE Stage II, is that I will not feel bad about tapping the elbow. I'm guessing that the spare battery tray was put there just for a meth/alky tank. Been looking into Devil's Own kits.

Posted

I just did the BG treatment at 16,500 miles. I can honestly say the truck runs smoother, has more power, and the mpgs seem to be up a lil. I'm ordering my catch can next week, and will probably do the BG treatment every 10,000 to 12,000 miles for as long as I own the truck

 

Scheduled a service appointment with my mechanic for tomorrow to do the BG treatment. I'm hoping to get some before and after pictures from his borescope. I will report the findings here if I do. When you did your BG service, did they change your oil afterwards?

Posted

Scheduled a service appointment with my mechanic for tomorrow to do the BG treatment. I'm hoping to get some before and after pictures from his borescope. I will report the findings here if I do. When you did your BG service, did they change your oil afterwards?

Nope, dealer is changing the oil tomorrow though

Posted

Nope, dealer is changing the oil tomorrow though

Ok yeah I didn't plan well for this. I did the dealer free oil change a few weeks ago and you're supposed to change oil after the bg service so now I have to pay to change it again after only 800 miles. Oh well. Next year I'll be able to do them both at the same time since I'll be done with the dealer changes and will be going to my side mechanic by then.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

 

That's definitely simplistic...

 

The good thing is that with the AFE Stage II, is that I will not feel bad about tapping the elbow. I'm guessing that the spare battery tray was put there just for a meth/alky tank. Been looking into Devil's Own kits.

 

...and effective.

 

We did this on turbocharged engines running 30+ psi and controlled the pump using a oil pressure switch placed in the intake manifold. When the boost came up to 3-4 psi, the switch tripped and water injection started.

 

For just occasionally cleaning an engine, a manually controlled injection system you can engage when under load is all that is needed. If you're trying to solve a detonation issue, that's different.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Yeah, I'm running a devils own water/ meth kit on my 450whp srt4. When we took the motor apart my intake was clean enough to eat off of. Great for detonation when raising the afr, adding more timing and turning the wick up.

Edited by 440hsp
  • Like 1
Posted

 

...and effective.

 

We did this on turbocharged engines running 30+ psi and controlled the pump using a oil pressure switch placed in the intake manifold. When the boost came up to 3-4 psi, the switch tripped and water injection started.

 

For just occasionally cleaning an engine, a manually controlled injection system you can engage when under load is all that is needed. If you're trying to solve a detonation issue, that's different.

 

I'm hoping that down the road I'll have a reason to have a detonation issue, lol. That's a long long way off though.

Posted (edited)

The good news: I did the BG induction service yesterday and the truck seems to be running great afterwards, no issues so far *knocks on wood*

 

The bad news: I could not get before and after pictures of the valves. The way the intake is designed on these engines, you can't get the borescope in there because of all the bends and turns. We would have had to remove the intake manifold to see the valves and I wasn't about to do that on an engine with only 15k miles.

 

So the catch can debate will have to rage on. I will say I have not really noticed much of an improvement with the truck as others have reported. It honestly wasn't really running bad before I did the service, I just wanted to get in before 15k miles to take advantage of BG's warranty. So if guys without catch cans are noting an improvement in performance after the service and I'm not noticing much of anything, I'd argue that's evidence in favor of the catch can doing what people say it should be doing....keeping the valves clean. I only had 11,500 miles on the truck when I installed the catch can so there wasn't much time for a lot of build-up to happen and dramatically affect performance, although I don't doubt that some buildup did occur and the service yesterday took care of it.

 

I'm going to post this in the catch can thread as well.

 

 

EDIT: Forgot to add it was about $78 in materials and $117 in labor for the BG service so $195 total. You have to get your oil changed as well afterwards so factor that into the total if you're considering doing this service.

Edited by Silverado-Hareek
  • 3 months later...
Posted

Been really curious about this... I'm installing my catch can this evening and I think I'm going to run up to the auto parts store and buy a can of CRC for good luck. My truck has 18k on it and I'm better off late than never with the can and intake cleaner. I'm going on a 2500 mile trip next week and just bought my oil but I'm going to clean out the intake before I do the oil.

Posted

Might be a dumb question but here it goes... Instead of putting the CRC valve cleaner in the front of the intake, can I spray it in the outlet hose coming from the catch can?

Posted (edited)

Might be a dumb question but here it goes... Instead of putting the CRC valve cleaner in the front of the intake, can I spray it in the outlet hose coming from the catch can?

 

I don't quite understand which hose you mean. Can you be more specific? Do you mean squirt it in the PCV valve where it goes into the intake manifold? I would think it would be fine, if you disconnect the PCV valve, seal around the spray can nozzle so you don't have a large vacuum leak. Maybe a small cork with a hole in the middle for the spray nozzle straw.

Edited by spurshot
Posted

 

I don't quite understand which hose you mean. Can you be more specific? Do you mean squirt it in the PCV valve where it goes into the intake manifold? I would think it would be fine, if you disconnect the PCV valve, seal around the spray can nozzle so you don't have a large vacuum leak. Maybe a small cork with a hole in the middle for the spray nozzle straw.

Exactly. I'm sorry if it might have been confusing.
Posted

 

I don't quite understand which hose you mean. Can you be more specific? Do you mean squirt it in the PCV valve where it goes into the intake manifold? I would think it would be fine, if you disconnect the PCV valve, seal around the spray can nozzle so you don't have a large vacuum leak. Maybe a small cork with a hole in the middle for the spray nozzle straw.

 

Quick, dumb newbie related question. Most of the catch can I am seeing are sealed systems that require unscrewing and draining on a regularly basis. Are they designed as a closed system on purpose to prevent vacuum leak issues, or is it possible to have an open system?

 

As an extreme example, would it be possible to have a catch can system with a bottom drain that just remained open all of the time. And if so would it require one way valves on the intake and outlet lines? (I'm in no way advocating polluting by letting oil drip onto the road, I'm just trying to be simplistic for the sake of my question and understanding.

Posted

 

Quick, dumb newbie related question. Most of the catch can I am seeing are sealed systems that require unscrewing and draining on a regularly basis. Are they designed as a closed system on purpose to prevent vacuum leak issues, or is it possible to have an open system?

 

As an extreme example, would it be possible to have a catch can system with a bottom drain that just remained open all of the time. And if so would it require one way valves on the intake and outlet lines? (I'm in no way advocating polluting by letting oil drip onto the road, I'm just trying to be simplistic for the sake of my question and understanding.

 

 

That would be called a vacuum leak.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2000 Silverado 1500 LS, whenever I put it into reverse and also in drive it clunks, the truck also feels sluggish when driving. Any advice/ideas ?
    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...