Jump to content

Throttle response on 6.2...


Recommended Posts

Posted

So I'm about ready to pull the trigger on a 2015 Iridium Denali with the 6.2 L. With that, I drove both that and a 2015 F150 Platinum with the Ecoboost yesterday. While overall, I like the Denali much better, I was significantly underwhelmed at the throttle response on the 6.2 compared to the Ecoboost. It just seemed like I really had to get into the throttle to get the truck to go. It made it feel as if the Ecoboost had a lot more torque, which I know isn't true. Does this get better or is there anything you can do to improve this?

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

You will need an aftermarket tune to address this. If a dealer tells you this will get better as the transmission "learns", they are lying. This has been an issue with the 5.3 and 6.2 with the 6spd. And the newer 6.2 with 8 spd also seem to have this.

Posted

Thanks. That's what I was afraid of. I'm sure I would get used to the throttle, but my initial response is that I'm not crazy about it. I guess my next question would be: Can you get a custom tune and not mess with the warranty?

Posted

Not to make your decision even harder, but I must respectfully disagree. The throttle teaponse does most certainly improve dramatically. In addition, YOUR calibration changes as well. A pedal with a 2" stroke will clearly feel much more "responsive" than a pedal with a 6" stroke since less pedal movement translates to greater throttle movement.

 

I'm not saying that the Ford pedal is shorter, but they do have different curves. But so does my wife's car.

 

If u want to speed things up, teach it what u want. If u want a snappy response, drive it like u stole it. U want a granny driving gas sipper? Piddle around and never make any quick changes, and never exceed 35% throttle.

Posted

I noticed with my 2012 Avalanche, at times it as a slow reaction once I hit the pedal. Then other times, it surprises the hell out of me. I kept thinking that GM programmed their system to not allow over acceleration, trying to keep stress off the drive chain; helping out on the 100k mile warranty.

Posted

The throttle response on my 6.2L Denali changed very little in the 4K miles I've driven in. I've babied it around and I've run it hard in all that time. Part of the throttle response issue is the time it takes the transmission to figure out exactly what it wants to do. Then it will open up. There have been times I've added some pedal and *nothing* happens, and then a little more finally gets some RPM or shift changes going. And it certainly isn't consistently predictable in my input vs its output.

 

Maybe the difference to my experience vs bdbake01 is the 8speed in mine.

Posted

Not to make your decision even harder, but I must respectfully disagree. The throttle teaponse does most certainly improve dramatically. In addition, YOUR calibration changes as well. A pedal with a 2" stroke will clearly feel much more "responsive" than a pedal with a 6" stroke since less pedal movement translates to greater throttle movement.

 

I'm not saying that the Ford pedal is shorter, but they do have different curves. But so does my wife's car.

 

If u want to speed things up, teach it what u want. If u want a snappy response, drive it like u stole it. U want a granny driving gas sipper? Piddle around and never make any quick changes, and never exceed 35% throttle.

I drove my 14' 5.3 for 15,000 miles before I was tired of it "learning". The factory TCM tune on these trucks blow and there are dozens of threads on this forum that cover, poor throttle response and lazy shifting. It also doesn't help that several truck reviews from very reputable magazines also make claim of poor throttle response.

 

I will tell you exactly the problems you will encounter while driving on a factory TCM tune;

  • Transmission always eager to get into 6th gear
  • Overextending 2nd gear past its power band while in partial throttle
  • Shifting early into 2nd, sometimes 3rd gear when pulling into the street.
  • While driving highway speeds needing to go nearly WOT to get the truck to downshift into the correct gear to get it up to passing speed.
  • Very high torque management from a stop

 

My tune fixed all of these and that is why I am so vocal about getting one to anyone who has any of the issues above. The transmission will only "learn" so much but it will not go past its set limits.

Posted

Thanks. That's what I was afraid of. I'm sure I would get used to the throttle, but my initial response is that I'm not crazy about it. I guess my next question would be: Can you get a custom tune and not mess with the warranty?

Unfortunately GM can go into the ECM/TCM and see a flash counter. While it won't exactly tell them there is a tune installed it can tell them how many times they have been flashed. They can then use this information and compare it to your service records. A tune will void your warranty, and if you are getting ANY clunking from the 8spd as some members have had here I would stay away from a tune till after 20-30k miles.

Posted

I found exactly the same until i did the throttle boost on my Diablo tuner. absolutely night and day

Posted

High expectations when I took a 6.2L/8 speed for a test drive.

Completely underwhelmed by throttle response.

And it had the steering vibration thing going.

Didn't like it at all

Posted

Custom tune will make it drive like a vette. Stock 6.2 feels like a 4 cylinder.

 

 

Throttle boost and tuned it's a beast

 

Now you guys are speaking my language!! Now, how do I avoid any warranty issues...?

Posted

In truth no one here can say for fact that GM can see flashes, or flash counters. We've heard they can, and we know there are different methods to do this, but no one here knows exactly how and what. Diablosport claims they employ GM software engineers to prove their custom tunes cannot be seen after return to stock tune.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...
    • // Thank you, also for your  response. More information is always good. This 2013 GMC is most likely my 'forever truck"-I'm 77 and retired...and truck only has 42K on it-very clean-so I try to keep it that way.  Tks again for your  response- glenn
    • I started my install this weekend. Everything was pretty straight forward but I ran into one issue with running power through the firewall. The nipple grommet on my High Country already has a small harness running through it - has anyone else ran into this issue? And on the engine bay side, does the wire basically just penetrate the factory wiring boot? I did this on my '22 Trail Boss and it seems much easier but thats been a few years. My other thought would be possibly drilling a new hole adding a rubber grommet just to the lower left of the factory hole. Thoughts?   Has anyone used a T-harness off the Bose amp and obtained power from there? It seems a little odd that such a small amp needs 3 power leads
    • ///// Ok--Thanks for that info--I could not find yesterday when I looked for the specs on that NAPA filter what I wanted. Their website is not very user friendly. I buy all teh filters for  our three vehicles once or twice a year. Have always run NAPA Gold on everything I own....I buy it thru my Son's account for his business-which he has a Heavy Equipment repair shop-one reason he uses NAPA so much-they have such a full line of coverage for just about anything/anywhere- He gets s  good discount because of volume bought. Anyway-Thank you -Sir for your response.   glenn
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...