Jump to content

What 4 door sports car should I get?

sahls01gmc

By sahls01gmc
in The Off-Topic Bar

Recommended Posts

sahls01gmc Senior Enthusiast

sahls01gmc

Posted
Posted

I'm looking into getting a sports car, and I want to go with a 4 door. Looking to do something different than the "mustang" or "camaro" route. Also, I've got 3 kids so it would be a better selling option to the boss if she knows there is room for the kids.

 

I've always been a fan of the CTS-V and G8's. I would really want to have rear wheel drive and a clutch. Outside of that, I'm open to options. What do you guys think?

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply
'01LS1 Senior Enthusiast

'01LS1

Posted
Posted

I like the sleeper effect of the current SS. 6spd & magnetic ride control. But they are not cheap, do not know what resale will be in 5 yrs or if parts availability will be an issue down the road.

 

 

Think there is a member here who has a 2015 or 2016 on order?

 

This guy has posted several videos with qtr mile times.

 

 

NitroCherokee Enthusiast

NitroCherokee

Posted
Posted

I like the sleeper effect of the current SS. 6spd & magnetic ride control. But they are not cheap, do not know what resale will be in 5 yrs or if parts availability will be an issue down the road.

 

 

Think there is a member here who has a 2015 or 2016 on order?

 

This guy has posted several videos with qtr mile times.

 

 

X2, these things are just flat awesome!

sahls01gmc Senior Enthusiast

sahls01gmc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Those are sweet! My only opposition would be the down the road parts availability.

 

I definitely like the "sleeper" effect. That's another reason for the 4 door route.

SouthernSilveradoGuy85 Senior Enthusiast

SouthernSilveradoGuy85

Posted
Posted

Well personally if I were to get a sports car/muscle car/pony car I would get 2 door, but if I wanted a 4 door I would go to the SS also. Looks like a normal sedan until you get on it and I was surprised to find out that they offer it in manual. I'm not saying that just because I'm die-hard GM and Chevy, but the only other performance sedan still made is the Charger and even though the new'15 Chargers look better, it still doesn't look like a complete sleeper like the SS.

 

I know you're worried about parts availability, but the G8 isn't even made anymore since it's a Pontiac. They use the same engine as the Camaro SS so engine parts shouldn't be hard to find. The only downside is that at least around my area I haven't seen any SSs on the road so it's hard to say how much of a demand it is. Of course if I had an SS I would be happy that it's not on at every corner like there is with a Mustang, but I would want some out there and I haven't really seen any "in the wild" lol.

sahls01gmc Senior Enthusiast

sahls01gmc

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Geez, you guys aren't much for variety, huh?!?

 

I'm not even so much worried about the top of the line model, that could add to the sleeper effect!

Stevens03 Senior Enthusiast

Stevens03

Posted
Posted

2012-2014 Charger SRT, hands down a better all around car for the money and they can be bought at a great price with ultra low miles used. I had one and MISS IT ALOT!. Power is unreal and it has great street manors. Turn traction control off and you have a drift car. Mine got 27mpg on a trip to the beach with 4 adults and the trunk loaded to the gills.

 

In 2 years If I don't need a truck, I'm going back to one.


2012-2014 Charger SRT, hands down a better all around car for the money and they can be bought at a great price with ultra low miles used. I had one and MISS IT ALOT!. Power is unreal and it has great street manors. Turn traction control off and you have a drift car. Mine got 27mpg on a trip to the beach with 4 adults and the trunk loaded to the gills. Average mileage around town was 19mpg. With 470hp, you'll be happy.

 

In 2 years If I don't need a truck, I'm going back to one.

'01LS1 Senior Enthusiast

'01LS1

Posted
Posted

Those are sweet! My only opposition would be the down the road parts availability.

 

I definitely like the "sleeper" effect. That's another reason for the 4 door route.

 

Contact this guy. Pretty sure (w/o reading the threads again) he has had both a 2014 & 2015 SS.

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/159313-silveradosc540-no-longer/

 

I am not on any of the Pontiac forums with regard to either the GTO or G8, but have not heard of parts being an issue.

Though it would be a concern as mentioned. Think the SS sells 2500 or so a year. The cool thing is that with that few,

you are kind of guaranteed a unique car in your(or any) neighborhood. Generally do not get that w/o the cost being above $75 grand.

 

Am also curious if anything is going to be added to the 2016? Have read a 1LE type handling package &/or a hp bump. Though nothing official.

 

& Stevens14, like the wheels you have added to your truck. Just noticed them writing this.

Chris Senior Enthusiast

Chris

Posted
Posted

 

Contact this guy. Pretty sure (w/o reading the threads again) he has had both a 2014 & 2015 SS.

http://www.gm-trucks.com/forums/topic/159313-silveradosc540-no-longer/

 

I am not on any of the Pontiac forums with regard to either the GTO or G8, but have not heard of parts being an issue.

Though it would be a concern as mentioned. Think the SS sells 2500 or so a year. The cool thing is that with that few,

you are kind of guaranteed a unique car in your(or any) neighborhood. Generally do not get that w/o the cost being above $75 grand.

 

Am also curious if anything is going to be added to the 2016? Have read a 1LE type handling package &/or a hp bump. Though nothing official.

 

& Stevens14, like the wheels you have added to your truck. Just noticed them writing this.

Yes Jon has had 2 SS's and before that a Callaway Silverado
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

If your not hung up shifting, jeep srt, if you want to spend less check out other SUVs . I just bought an Hyundai Santa Fe runs pretty good closest thing to an manual auto I've drove lately. Hyundai Geneses R Spec, same thing inexpensive and quick.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Rawyzf Senior Enthusiast

Rawyzf

Posted
Posted

G8, best car I've owned. Still question myself for selling it.

 

 

 

Sent from Tapatalk App - Samsung S6

SnakeEyeSS Senior Enthusiast

SnakeEyeSS

Posted
Posted

Geez, you guys aren't much for variety, huh?!?

 

I'm not even so much worried about the top of the line model, that could add to the sleeper effect!

2008+ E92 M3. (The one with the V8.) Supposed to be one of the best Four Door sports sedans ever made. Same with the E39 M5. It was the car GM used to benchmark the G8 GXP(/SS).

Even today, the E39 M5 is reguarded as one of the best cars ever made.

 

 

Both cars can be had under $30k now, cheaper than an SS.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Another JR
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By Another JR · Posted

      Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • newdude
      Gas fill door

      By newdude · Posted

      Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • newdude
      Gasser Subforum Has Been Quiet - - So, Regenerative Braking and Using L10

      By newdude · Posted

      No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...