Jump to content

Speed Limiter


Recommended Posts

Posted

In much of the west the Interstate speeds have been raised to 80 mph. I understand there is a section in Texas where 85 is being 'tested'.

Not sure about it being tested still. We have had it for a few years now. It is wonderful!!
  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Yeah that 85MPH is in austin/round rock. toll 130. So to only be able to go 10 over and get hit by the speed limiter is crappy. A cop will probably laugh and say, "HAHA! He can't go more than 10 over the speed limit!" They can't even ticket me.

Posted

Was on the freeway the other day and mine stopped accelerating at 98 as well. I was trying to pass others and didn't notice I was going 90, so I understand how that goes. When I noticed I was going 90 I just decided to see how fast I could get it. Like I said, stopped accelerating at 98.

Posted

I don't know, I've had my 2015 Silverado 5.3 over 100 (104-106? and it's bone stock w 4400 miles on it.....

Posted

I remembered reading something to the effect that a 6.2 with the 6 spd would go 110/112 but 6.2 with 8 spd stops at 98ish.

Wow really so you can go faster on a 6 speed than 8?

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Posted

So I guess I'm to assume that there's really no rhyme or reason as to why some 6.2L, 8 speed trucks exceed the 98 mph cutoff and some don't.

Posted

There probably is some combination of options and/or build dates that changes where the limiter gets set -- but it hasn't been sorted out here yet.

Posted

Yeah that 85MPH is in austin/round rock. toll 130. So to only be able to go 10 over and get hit by the speed limiter is crappy. A cop will probably laugh and say, "HAHA! He can't go more than 10 over the speed limit!" They can't even ticket me.

Yep, it's very easy to go over 90 when passing on SH130 with 85MPH as the "limit". I set the speed alarm at 95, just as a reminder to slow down haha.

Posted

My 2014 6.2 with the six-speed and a .373 rear end tops out at between 95 and 100.

My double cab with this configuration is 92.

Posted

My 2014 5.3 6 speed cuts off at 112mph. After looking, my tires are S rated which validates what the others are saying.

Posted

Because a 6,000 lb vehicle w/ a huge wheelbase, near 10,000 lb tow rating w/ leaf springs, no weight in the back, junk all terrain or all season SUV/truck tires, steering about as tight as a U-boat, shouldn't be traveling at that rate of speed let alone any higher.

 

I think 80-85 is about as fast as you'd ever need these trucks to go, and even then they're not anywhere near as stable/safe at that speed as even most of the cheap econoboxes on the road these days.

 

God forbid you need to do a panic maneuver/stop anywhere south of 80+ in one of these trucks, wouldn't be pretty.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,858
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MANGOAL
    Newest Member
    MANGOAL
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 626 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...