Jump to content

What's the most aggressive A/T on the market?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Duratracs aren't AT's. Neither are Toyo RT's. Both great tires IMO

 

KO2's

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

The Toyo AT2 Extreme is my next purchase. 285 60 r 20 or 55. find someone that carries them and go look at them. Les Schwab around these parts. They are an AT with a little extra on the side to make them look more aggressive.

Posted

I can not find anything on the AT2 extremes. I am hoping to find them in a 275/65/20

The Extreme is only on certain sizes. I think it's denoted as "XT" next to the tire size or in the tire specs.

Posted

Duratracs aren't AT's. Neither are Toyo RT's. Both great tires IMO

KO2's

I am curious as to why you say Duratracs aren't AT's?

It doesn't matter a great deal but when I go to a Fountain Tire, they call them all terrains and they are very similar to BF AT's in spacing. I have never seen a mud tire rated for winter......

Posted

I am curious as to why you say Duratracs aren't AT's?

It doesn't matter a great deal but when I go to a Fountain Tire, they call them all terrains and they are very similar to BF AT's in spacing. I have never seen a mud tire rated for winter......

Its more of a hybrid but its more an AT

 

Sent from my Note 4 on Tapashit

Posted

I am curious as to why you say Duratracs aren't AT's?

It doesn't matter a great deal but when I go to a Fountain Tire, they call them all terrains and they are very similar to BF AT's in spacing. I have never seen a mud tire rated for winter......

Just my opinion. I feel it's more of a hybrid type tire as the Toyo RT is between the Toyo AT and MT's. Don't get me wrong. I still feel it's an awesome tire. I just don't classify it as an AT that's all. Ridden in vehicles with both the KO2's and Duratracs. Duratracs had more road hum and a bit more vibe/rumble at slower speeds.

 

For what it's worth I am running KO2's right now. Super tire in all climates. Amazed me in snow how well it drove. In April truck is scheduled for a 6" lift and 35's and I'm gonna try out the Toyo RT's. More aggressive look and ride.

 

But as I said it's simply just my opinion...and we all know what opinions are like! ; )

Posted

thanks. Will a LT285/55R20 fit on these? I have a 2" level.

Yes, it's just a hair wider than stock

 

Another common choice is 275/60-20, same width but taller than stock

 

Both of those tires will fit a 2014+ stock, you don't even need a level

Posted

Toyo M55's are aggressive and long wearing if you aren't on graveled roads

Posted

I am in this market too. Price on the Toyo at 2s is hard to beat. I think that is what I will end up with.

I've got the AT 2's. Pretty happy with them. Got about 30k miles on them and the tread barely looks worn.

Posted

Looking around for A/T's for my Silverado as well.

 

I have a set of Goodyear Duratracs on a Jeep Wrangler. Good tires, but only had them about 20k miles. Great on dry rock, as well as wet pavement. OK in slick stuff and snow. Tread-wear seems to be consistent with mileage, but time will tell. I'd expect at least 50k out of these Duratracs, and so far, we seem to be on track :)

 

I also had a set of BFGoodrich AT KO's on a Jeep. I wouldn't hesitate to go KO or KO2 on my Jeep or Silverado. They're quiet, and have good traction in all conditions. Quieter than the Duratracs at 20k, that's for sure.

 

I'm also looking at the General Grabber AT2's based on price for the truck. Nice design, good reviews, great price. All these tires are LT, not P.

 

...Looking at the Dueler H/T's on my Silverado and thinking they're weak-sauce...they've been OK on the road, not great on slick/wet stuff. 11k miles and counting. OK for my uses, but they just look out of place on such a big truck.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...