Jump to content

Wireless Charging Pad in 2016 Sierrra HD Console TOO SMALL!!


AUTOGUY

Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone else buy a 2016 GM Truck with the Wireless charging pad in the console? I traded my 2015 Sierra Denali HD for a 2016 to get the upgraded headlights, revised steering, and the Wireless Charging Pad built into the Console lid among other things.

Anyhow, have the truck for about a month, and I just got around to buying a cover for my iPhone 6 Plus to make it wireless compatible. So the cover comes in, I install it on my phone, and go out to my truck to try it out, and find that it does not fit in the tray!! No way to make it work!!! So, I figure maybe they will add the wireless charging to the next generation phone and I will just have to wait for an upgrade. I take the cover off, and then realize even with NO cover on the phone, the charging tray is at lease 1/4" to narrow for the phone to fit flat (which it would have to do in order for the feature to work).
So, now I have a truck with a NEW feature that is obsolete before I even used it. What do I have to do, go back to an iPhone 3 in order to make this work? I love my GM trucks, I have had many since my first in 1988, but this is just a blatant oversight by whoever designed and approved the size of this tray!!!
Anyone think this is something we can take to GM and force an upgrade on a $68k truck???
12747903_10208689238927514_6320469876316
11143333_10208689237127469_7148835501577
  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

You could use a phone the size of a phone instead of a tablet and all will be right in the world again.

 

Typical useless keyboard cowboy reply. What I choose to use for a phone is nowhere near a tablet, and probably 90% of the current smartphones are this size. ';m trying to make a point that when this feature was added to the truck, these phones were already on the market and popular. Now, go find your 2" flip phone and call someone that cares about your smart ass attitude.

Posted

Does your phone fit without a cover?

 

 

 

Anyone else buy a 2016 GM Truck with the Wireless charging pad in the console? I traded my 2015 Sierra Denali HD for a 2016 to get the upgraded headlights, revised steering, and the Wireless Charging Pad built into the Console lid among other things.

Anyhow, have the truck for about a month, and I just got around to buying a cover for my iPhone 6 Plus to make it wireless compatible. So the cover comes in, I install it on my phone, and go out to my truck to try it out, and find that it does not fit in the tray!! No way to make it work!!! So, I figure maybe they will add the wireless charging to the next generation phone and I will just have to wait for an upgrade. I take the cover off, and then realize even with NO cover on the phone, the charging tray is at lease 1/4" to narrow for the phone to fit flat (which it would have to do in order for the feature to work).
So, now I have a truck with a NEW feature that is obsolete before I even used it. What do I have to do, go back to an iPhone 3 in order to make this work? I love my GM trucks, I have had many since my first in 1988, but this is just a blatant oversight by whoever designed and approved the size of this tray!!!
Anyone think this is something we can take to GM and force an upgrade on a $68k truck???
12747903_10208689238927514_6320469876316
11143333_10208689237127469_7148835501577

 

Posted

 

Typical useless keyboard cowboy reply. What I choose to use for a phone is nowhere near a tablet, and probably 90% of the current smartphones are this size. ';m trying to make a point that when this feature was added to the truck, these phones were already on the market and popular. Now, go find your 2" flip phone and call someone that cares about your smart ass attitude.

So go buy a phone that fits in the charging area. My 5 has no problem.

Or buy a wireless docking pad and set it on the dash or wherever you like.

Or you could go buy a truck that fits your needs. You're certainly not going to make gm upgrade the console

Posted

The Note 5 also does not fit with or without a case.

 

Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk

Posted

I have a Galaxy S5 with Spigen Slim Armor case. I fits almost perfectly in the opening. It did make me realize that I'll have to be aware of this when getting a new phone in a few months. Anything bigger will likely not fit with a case.

Posted

Can we start a list of phones that do and do not fit? So from what I see the Galaxy S5 fits with a slim case but not the note 5. So I would assume the Galaxy S6 would also not fit since they are roughly the same size as the note.

Posted

Can we start a list of phones that do and do not fit? So from what I see the Galaxy S5 fits with a slim case but not the note 5. So I would assume the Galaxy S6 would also not fit since they are roughly the same size as the note.

 

 

iPhone 6 Plus does not fit.... (Without case)

Samsung Note 3 does not fit.... (Without case)

Posted

Can we start a list of phones that do and do not fit? So from what I see the Galaxy S5 fits with a slim case but not the note 5. So I would assume the Galaxy S6 would also not fit since they are roughly the same size as the note.

Anything larger than 3"x6.75" will not fit.
Posted

I also can confirm Note 4 doesn't fit, but it doesn't have native wireless charging(can be added).

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,863
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Bulldogger
    Newest Member
    Bulldogger
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 828 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way too big headlights (similar to a previous non-Wrangler SUV) should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crossing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...