Jump to content

Wireless Charging Pad in 2016 Sierrra HD Console TOO SMALL!!


AUTOGUY

Recommended Posts

Posted

hey guys, i just bought and installed one of these:

 

http://www.amazon.com/wireless-charging-charger-Silverado-FDMC-1270/dp/B00VU1FWO2

 

install was about an hour, was pretty easy. and it works great.

 

heres a pic of my install:

 

13312617_10157142281055713_5205878616366

 

also, bought it for only 150 on savinglots.com

 

 

 

How do you like it? It seems to fill in the slot completely, i kinda like the slot as it keeps things from sliding off. Plus for $150, it seems a lot when people have done their hacks for like than $30 or $40 to do a similar thing.

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I love it. It's still recessed, its just the angle of the picture. Its a much larger charging mat so it doesn't need to be precisely in one spot. And it's very anti slip

Posted

This thread is about the 2016 Sierra/Silverado Wireless Charging pad Specifically. not a retrofit on older ones.

Posted

I believe this thread was about the charging pad being too small, then it went to retrofitting trucks with larger pads from other GM vehicles. This pad is larger. And what's the big deal anyways?

Posted

My wife's iPhone 6 fits with a charger case on. She has a '16 suburban. My 6s Plus does not fit with or without a case as eluded in this post.

I understand the Escalade has adopted a larger charger area to address this problem, but likely will take a Year Model or two to have this "convenience" trickle down to GMC And further Chevrolet. It's a bummer, cause travel a lot and would like to utilize the feature of not having wires and keeping the phone topped off. I guess the iPhone needs to be tethered USB to use CarPlay in the infotainment anyway and couldn't use the wireless charger pad

time as my wife anyway so i am content at this point since it is primarily her car. My Silverado is 1 year too old to have the charger in the armrest, so I guess I'll wait to trade till they make the pad bigger. I think this is a big overlook by GM at this point cause as the responses above show, there are s lot of us that use the large screen phones, albeit android or Apple. Nonetheless this is an awesome option to have even if they designed it before the larger phones became prominent. If only Apple would integrate this into their phones so we didn't need a receiver case!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6s Plus using Tapatalk

Posted

I believe this thread was about the charging pad being too small, then it went to retrofitting trucks with larger pads from other GM vehicles. This pad is larger. And what's the big deal anyways?

Posted

My wife's iPhone 6 fits with a charger case on. She has a '16 suburban. My 6s Plus does not fit with or without a case as eluded in this post.

I understand the Escalade has adopted a larger charger area to address this problem, but likely will take a Year Model or two to have this "convenience" trickle down to GMC And further Chevrolet. It's a bummer, cause travel a lot and would like to utilize the feature of not having wires and keeping the phone topped off. I guess the iPhone needs to be tethered USB to use CarPlay in the infotainment anyway and couldn't use the wireless charger pad

time as my wife anyway so i am content at this point since it is primarily her car. My Silverado is 1 year too old to have the charger in the armrest, so I guess I'll wait to trade till they make the pad bigger. I think this is a big overlook by GM at this point cause as the responses above show, there are s lot of us that use the large screen phones, albeit android or Apple. Nonetheless this is an awesome option to have even if they designed it before the larger phones became prominent. If only Apple would integrate this into their phones so we didn't need a receiver case!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6s Plus using Tapatalk

 

 

Even without the case, my 6 plus does not fit in the current standard charger. I was told by GM Engineers that the size and design was done 2 years ago, and they went with the three or four most popular phones at that time. I still think they should have know enough to give it some headroom for upcoming phones. The fact that the iPhone 6 Plus was out before they released the trucks with this charger is a huge fail in my book!!

Posted

 

Typical useless keyboard cowboy reply. What I choose to use for a phone is nowhere near a tablet, and probably 90% of the current smartphones are this size. ';m trying to make a point that when this feature was added to the truck, these phones were already on the market and popular. Now, go find your 2" flip phone and call someone that cares about your smart ass attitude.

You are getting a little mad there sir. But BTW I have a galaxy s7. One of the biggest phones and mine still fits fine. You have a tablet.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Posted

The biggest trend in cell phones is large phones such as the iPhone plus.. Besides the point that the phone should be able to fit, GM should at least offer a replacement part to fix the problem.

Posted

The biggest trend in cell phones is large phones such as the iPhone plus.. Besides the point that the phone should be able to fit, GM should at least offer a replacement part to fix the problem.

I don't know if they can get any bigger than they are now, it is already hard enough to keep them in your pocket. But I do agree it would be nicer for gm to offer the option. Hopefully in next year's model.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Posted

This thread is about the 2016 Sierra/Silverado Wireless Charging pad Specifically. not a retrofit on older ones.

The option can still work on 2016 trucks just as well as older models. As I imagine I could get this option from the 2016 and fit it in my 2014 as well.

 

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Posted

just remove about 10 screws, drill 6 holes, tap into wiring into cigarette outlet in console. took me an hourish. had to run to lowes to get tap splices, that was the only delay.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I have a Samsung Galaxy S5 I am trying to use in my 2016 Sierra 1500. I have the same problem as described here. After some investigation I found several issues with the charging pad the prevent the wireless receiver in the phone from make making an adequate inductive coupling connection to the wireless transmitter in the console.

 

1. The size/shape of the cut-out in the console prevent the phones receiver from being positioned directly over the consoles transmitter. There is only a small tollerence to achieve this coupling.

2. The ribbed lines on the rubber charging mat raise the phone. For inductive coupling to occur the receiver and transmitter need to be in very close proximity to one another. I don't know the exact spec, but 1/8" or less seems to be the norm. This ribbed design already raises the phone up half that

3. The raised areas on bothe end of the charging pad raise the phone about 1/4"..see item 2

4. The charging pads area is exceptionally small. A larger effective area would provide a greater tolerance to align the phones receiver's antenna pad on more modern and typically larger phones

 

The GM design is outdated and will only support smaller phones or larger phones that have either an exceptionally large receiver antenna or just by chance happen to line up well with the transmitter's antenna. Come on GM, a system offered on a 2016 vehicle should work with popular phone for the same time period or older!

 

I am going to look into either repositioning the transmitter to align with my phones receiver or trim the rubber mat's ribs and raised portions ( areas on the top and bottom) so my phone will align and lay flat. Both are a bit risky and I really hate trying this on a brand new $50k truck. If I decide to go forward I will post my results. Bottom line..Pull your head out GM and fix this for customers

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...