Jump to content

Wanted input with those who went with a 5.3 over a 6.2L.


ericxog

Recommended Posts

Posted

My father is getting a CCSB High Country and I'm getting a RCSB LS. I didn't get to drive a RCSB but I did take a RCLB for a run and his CCSB. All the extra weight in the CCSB almost requires a 6.2. As bad as I want a 6.2 in my truck a 5.3 should push a SWB truck around no problem.

 

Also just a side note for anyone in a similar situation as me, I'm talking with my salesman's about having a SLP supercharger installed on my truck. 520hp in a SWB and roughly the same price as a 6.2 LTZ. Only downside is my warranty is going to be reduced to 3 years/60000 kms.

 

E85 also evens the playing field at bit, too bad E85 isn't available in my area.

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

My father is getting a CCSB High Country and I'm getting a RCSB LS. I didn't get to drive a RCSB but I did take a RCLB for a run and his CCSB. All the extra weight in the CCSB almost requires a 6.2. As bad as I want a 6.2 in my truck a 5.3 should push a SWB truck around no problem.

 

Also just a side note for anyone in a similar situation as me, I'm talking with my salesman's about having a SLP supercharger installed on my truck. 520hp in a SWB and roughly the same price as a 6.2 LTZ. Only downside is my warranty is going to be reduced to 3 years/60000 kms.

 

E85 also evens the playing field at bit, too bad E85 isn't available in my area.

520 hp will certainly give you bragging rights! If you're concerned about being under-powered, I am confident the stock motor will provide more power than you will ever need. I would definitely give the loss in warranty serious consideration. This warranty has saved me a couple of thousand dollars in the past. However, if money isn't a big issue, then the extra hp will be exciting!

Posted

 

The one BIG thing about all of these trucks though is how expensive everything has become. $50K is a drop in a bucket now for many of these.

Thats because they are no longer just a tool, they serve as the family suv, but the rear cargo area is a bed

 

If you price out a similarly equiped yukon/suburban/tahoe, it suddenly isn't such a bad deal

Posted

You can get package deals in the low 30K you don't really lose that much, can't do that with a Full sized GM SUV.

Posted

Has anyone ever said "this thing has too much power"??

Kinda like saying, omg her breasts are way to big. Lol

Posted

Has anyone ever said "this thing has too much power"??

Kinda like saying, omg her breasts are way to big. Lol

Yes, one of the reasons I got rid of my Mustang. Floor it in anything but 70+ degree sunny weather and your spinning tire and going sideways. Also, you throw it in 3rd and shift to 4th and pass someone...guess what your in triple digit speeds. Lots of power will get you in trouble on the street.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Thats because they are no longer just a tool, they serve as the family suv, but the rear cargo area is a bed

 

If you price out a similarly equiped yukon/suburban/tahoe, it suddenly isn't such a bad deal

 

To be fair, for what the majority of the population uses they're trucks for a compact SUV would be more than enough. You hardly see anyone towing with they're 50k pickup anymore, and most people put a cover on the bed so it's not much good for anything but luggage. But this is coming from a guy who's main purpose in buying a truck is to have a race car / off road rig / daily driver / work horse all in one.

 

Yes, one of the reasons I got rid of my Mustang. Floor it in anything but 70+ degree sunny weather and your spinning tire and going sideways. Also, you throw it in 3rd and shift to 4th and pass someone...guess what your in triple digit speeds. Lots of power will get you in trouble on the street.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Valid point, but from what I've seen in the test drive the 6.2 isn't going to be a handful to drive in a truck edging on 6000 pounds.

Posted

I test drove the 2500 Dmax and the 1500 6.2 & 5.3. I got the 6.2 because of the fun factor, pulls the boat great and rides fantastic. If I were driving it all around town all the time and it was a work truck, I probably would have gone for the 5.3 just for the fuel savings. I do drive customers around so the Denali is nice and add the Borla exhust and I usually get some eyes perking up from the husbands, not so much the wives..lol

Posted

Yes, one of the reasons I got rid of my Mustang. Floor it in anything but 70+ degree sunny weather and your spinning tire and going sideways. Also, you throw it in 3rd and shift to 4th and pass someone...guess what your in triple digit speeds. Lots of power will get you in trouble on the street.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I have a 2011 5.0, I can floor it at anytime including a stop and it hooks up beautifully

Posted

I have a 2011 5.0, I can floor it at anytime including a stop and it hooks up beautifully

I had a 2013 5.0 with long tubes and a tune. Could break the rear end lose almost at anytime in first, unless my tires were warmed up and it was hot. Pretty much anytime below 70 degrees outside I would spin in first and second. This was on the stock track pack pirellis...

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Yes, one of the reasons I got rid of my Mustang. Floor it in anything but 70+ degree sunny weather and your spinning tire and going sideways. Also, you throw it in 3rd and shift to 4th and pass someone...guess what your in triple digit speeds. Lots of power will get you in trouble on the street.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Tires do wonders. I run ET streets on my GTO.

Posted

I had a 2013 5.0 with long tubes and a tune. Could break the rear end lose almost at anytime in first, unless my tires were warmed up and it was hot. Pretty much anytime below 70 degrees outside I would spin in first and second. This was on the stock track pack pirellis...

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You gotta try something that traps 125+

Posted

I had a 2014 with the 5.3 - traded and got a 2016 with the 6.2 = it was worth it. 6.2 is a monster.

Posted

I went with the 5.3 simply because I got a great deal on a 2015 Denali, loaded, with everything I wanted except the 6.2. I test drove it and honestly didn't feel like the 6.2 was that much more powerful to let the deal go. I saved enough on this purchase in conjunction with what they gave me on my trade to get the Whipple supercharger and still come out ahead of an equally equipped 6.2. So in a perfect world I would love to have gotten the 6.2, but I don't have any regrets about the 5.3 either. It's really a great engine on its own and has a fantastic balance of fuel economy/power/usability/fun. So don't feel bad about your choice. Just enjoy it. If you feel like you need more power just slap some boost on it and you'll end up with more hp and torque anyway.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

And just FYI - most the people that drove the 6.2 only one time (test drive, etc) don't know about the "click" on the bottom of accelerator pedal. When I first got my 6.2 I also thought there was no big difference coming from a 5.3.

 

Then I discovered you need to push that pedal hard through the dendent at to get the monster to wake up....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Part is $233.87.     Not sure where $900 came from?  
    • Looks like you have it figured out. Did you run a sensor into the rear diff housing?    What sort of diff temp swings would you see towing or not? I have wondered how hot it can get 
    • Dealer just confirmed that GM is "out of AC compressors."  Not sure if all 2019 to 2026 trucks use the same compressor, but a shortage like that is hard to believe.  
    • I think we're reaching the end of constant projects/work.   The water pump bolt appears to have self-sealed, as it's not leaking anymore. I'll take it, and, I'm ready should it self-unseal! I was also getting an oil leak at the front oil pan seal and timing cover and came to find a pan bolt on the corner wasn't even finger-tight. Too easy. And, it was. But, it appears tightening it has reduced a leak producing spots on the ground every time I parked, to just a weep, leaving an occasional dot on the cardboard that lives under it while parked. That's acceptable on a 30 year old engine in my book. I do hate leaks, but, replacing the pan seal is quite the job.   The rear washer line is reconnected and the sprayer works, although getting an intermittent washer fluid drip off the bottom. I think it's just residual...the reservoir filled up the channel in the rear floor and drained down into the upside-down spare tire/wheel. So there are residual puddles all over under there, will wait a few days for it to spill out and dry before I go chasing a potential leak.   The door speaker...no dice. Speaker works just fine, it's that channel in the factory amp that's gone bad. Can't win 'em all. And, whomever buys this will probably tear out the factory radio for something more modern anyway.   I put about 110 miles on it yesterday. Put a lot of wind and heat into it with some mountain driving. Still runs great. Near the top of the pass I got off on a gravel side road and put about 10 miles on with 4hi engaged. Works great.   If ya squint, she's mint! God I wish these were still in production. I can see why they're not. They're rudimentary bordering on agricultural. They began life as a pickup truck and then modern society demanded the rear be enclosed for kids and crap. They're still a pickup underneath, and that gives them lots of ride character, sway and bounce and bump steer. They're alive on the road, and, at least for purposes of nostalgia, it makes driving one a lot of fun.   The Check Engine light did come back on the pass, P0134 for the upstream O2 sensor dropping out. Putting heat into the exhaust causes it after about 10-15 seconds of increased load at higher RPM. The downstream sensor is completely mangled (someone clearly had a rough time removing it, but they didn't replace it?) so I'll just put two in it. For what, mostly to cure the CEL, I can tell the cat is damaged. It's not plugged or fractured, but it's not catalyzing. There's some guilt in not fixing it, but at a cost of $500+, the truck just won't get driven much under my watch. I dislike the smell...running the truck in the shop even with both doors open and the overhead fans blasting, I still reek of pre-cat exhaust. Sticks to clothing and everything else.   Window motor (I'm dreading this), and tires, and that should be about it. 50/50 on Starfire Solarus H/T's, or spending $20 more per tire and going with Cooper Discoverer RT's. I like the look of the RT's a lot more, but is it worth it? I've got a really good (just very old) Toyo Open Country XTX on there now and I like it.  
    • From what I've seen, they "could" sell the switch but designed the assembly such that the switch can't be readily removed and replaced without removing a plastic locating pin.  Sure appears aimed at forcing the end user to purchase a $900 shifter assembly instead of a $20 switch.  Thankfully I still have some extended warranty left...  this one has had warranty repairs almost every 5K miles from the day I bought it.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...