Jump to content

Wanted input with those who went with a 5.3 over a 6.2L.


ericxog

Recommended Posts

Posted

I wanted a 6.2 but i was on a mission to get a truck with painted bumpers and no chrome. couldn't find a midnight or a custom sport with a 6.2 near me in may of 15 and i bought the 2lt 5.3 that im happy with. only reason i wish i had the 6.2 tho so i could beat up on those losers who think their old rusty cummins and 7.3 are actually fast. although after seeing all the 8 speed problems its a blessing in disguise to have the 6 speed! (even though it shifts like a MasseyFerguson)

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I went with the 5.3 mainly because I didn't want all the extras that came with the SLT and only saw the 6.2 available mostly loaded. I was also debating on a HD with the diesel engine but the cost just seemed crazy for my daily driver. Maybe the next truck.

 

Anyway, I'm happy I don't have to run premium gas. She has plenty of getup and go from stock so I've got no regrets.

 

I can agree with you 100%. If I could have gotten a 6.2 with SLE, i would have

Posted

Honestly, with the cost I saved from the truck I got I can afford to throw a supercharger in it if I want. That should net me somewhere in the range of 100hp/ft-lbs over the 6.2 in stock config.

 

I wish GMC would have an option for the 6.2 in SLE but even more than that I would love a diesel so for me, if I'm gonna step up in the future that's where it will be.

 

Oh well, if I built this truck and it was perfect I wouldn't get to own another one. Where is the fun in that? :P

Posted

Don't know why I'm posting this besides to vent. I just recently purchased a 2016 Silverado Z71 LT 4x4. The truck is beautiful, makes good enough power for me with the 5.3L, and drives wonderfully. My main issue though, is I rushed into the purchase, and really needed a solid daily driver. Crazy enough, I didn't know this truck was available in LTZ trim with a 6.2. I purchased a completely loaded LT at 50k with all options, and basically having some regret since there is a LTZ 6.2L w/ 8 speed transmission sitting on the lot for 51k right now.

 

Anyone actually have the funds and means to own the 6.2L, but truly prefer the 5.3? I'm by all means not unhappy with the 5.3 at all, just an ego thing at this point.

 

 

I drove several 5.3s and 6.2s before making the decision to go with the 6.2 option.

 

Here's my take: if you bought the 5.3 then just enjoy it and even consider tuning it down the road. You can get some decent power out of it. But, keep in mind that none of these trucks are designed to be road-racers or sports cars. The extra power in the 6.2 is something that you would use maybe what...10% of the time? Don't worry about your choice.

Posted

When I bought mine the Texas edition was loaded pretty good only came with a 5.3 for 15K less than the nearest 6.2 option. I did my research and found on e-85 was only 40 hp less. E- 85 is plentiful In my area and much cheaper than 93 grade gas. When I went on trips I just put reg gas in it. I did a max energy tune on the trans knock out the V4, no regrets. Went back later drove a 6.2 felt no differents seat of the pants, they probly had reg gas in the 6.2 but still no regrets.

Posted

Its a truck. They are not made to go fast. I could never understand why people want fast trucks. They are made for hauling heavy loads and are a utility vehicle.

Posted

Parts of the world with shitty highways and the desire for acceleration. I could never understand a person wanting a performance car here... Useless.

 

Sent from my PURE XL using Tapatalk

Posted

I am on my 2nd Denali with 6.2L (2012 and 2015) and I would not want a different engine. I had the 5.3L in several trucks in the past, nothing wrong with the 5.3L but I just won't ever buy one again as long as the 6.2L is available.

Posted

0 = total number of people on planet earth that prefer the 5.3 over the 6.2

Sorry man

Well not all of us want the extra useless crap that gm force feeds you to get the 6.2. Last truck was an SLT, won't buy another loaded truck again.

 

A 2500HD 6.0 fits the bill nicely, can be had with any trim level.

Posted

Don't know why I'm posting this besides to vent. I just recently purchased a 2016 Silverado Z71 LT 4x4. The truck is beautiful, makes good enough power for me with the 5.3L, and drives wonderfully. My main issue though, is I rushed into the purchase, and really needed a solid daily driver. Crazy enough, I didn't know this truck was available in LTZ trim with a 6.2. I purchased a completely loaded LT at 50k with all options, and basically having some regret since there is a LTZ 6.2L w/ 8 speed transmission sitting on the lot for 51k right now.

 

Anyone actually have the funds and means to own the 6.2L, but truly prefer the 5.3? I'm by all means not unhappy with the 5.3 at all, just an ego thing at this point.

Buyers' remorse is what I think they call this.... Your 5.3 6 speed is a great combination and has all the power and speed anyone with a half ton needs. I chose a 4.3 V6 and have 0 remorse!.

Posted

I love my 5.3, all i use is e85. Have not towed with it. I could not afford a 2500 series so i went with this route with plans in future to buy a 2500 series setup. Hopefully i can do that

 

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

Posted

I can afford any thing I want. The only options I didn't have were the sun roof, GPS, Bose, 6.2, for 15K more. Now if I could added the 6.2 for 2500$ more, I wouldn't have 40 more HP not worth it to me. I can get E 85. That kind of thinking got me retired at 59. You people who say truck aren't supposed to be fast, some of my past factory performance cars weren't as fast as theses trucks.

Posted

You people who say truck aren't supposed to be fast, some of my past factory performance cars weren't as fast as theses trucks.

 

Well it's a little unfair to compare something new to something older, even something 5 years old now a days. There's V6s in non performance sedans that make more HP and TQ than small block V8s did back in the muscle car era. Just like small block N/A V8s easily make more HP and TQ than big blocks back in that era. I'm only 31, but if you're into cars it doesn't take long to realize back then if you wanted more power from the factory you just got a bigger c.i. engine. Again it would have been nice to have the 6.2 but I'm very happy with the 5.3. It also doesn't bother me since you have to get an LTZ/SLT or higher trim just to get the 6.2 which I don't want all that stuff that they come with including the price. I have a well optioned LT while not being fully loaded. Also I plan on regearing from 3.08s to 3.73s so acceleration will be a lot better and I'll be able to tow 11,000 lbs. I don't want a race truck, but being a car/truck person I like it to be fun to drive.

Posted

Just my opinion....I drove the 5.3L and the 6.2L back to back several times and found that the neither was a rocket-ship, but the torque in the 6.2L went up hills a lot easier and had better throttle response for passing. That is what made my decision. But, those things aren't important to other people. It's good to have options though.

 

The one BIG thing about all of these trucks though is how expensive everything has become. $50K is a drop in a bucket now for many of these.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,866
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Greg3160
    Newest Member
    Greg3160
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 476 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Late reply, but yes—it works on the SLT trim. Compatibility comes down to the plastic shroud shape behind your mirror, not the trim badge itself. On the SLT with auto-dimming, it uses a plug-and-play Y-harness off the mirror/rain sensor power, so no need to run wires down to the OBD port. If anyone's ever unsure about fitment, just drop a photo of your mirror housing and we can double-check it.   Appreciate the detailed feedback on the install! On the windshield glare—we actually took feedback like yours and developed a dedicated CPL (polarizer) filter to cut down dash reflections on sunny days. If you're still running the cam, shoot me a DM. I'd be happy to send a CPL filter over for you to test out—no charge. 
    • There are no stickers in your glovebox?
    • Look at the numbers on the stickers in the door jam...
    • Yes, every time the developer updates his code, you must recompile. I will private message you with the latest because it changes pretty much with every version.
    • After I wrote that reply I went for a ride. 85 F out. So trans started at 85 F and it shifted the same as it did an hour latter at 168 F. I've never actually recorded the to cold to shift point but it is under 32 F before they start hanging on to a lower gear or leaving the converter unlocked. Both intended to heat fluid.    Yes, brake or bake. Absolutely.      Your welcome. True research ended decades ago. Field trials are still in play.    There is a thing called oxidation onset temperature. This is the heat related oxidation not the O2 exposure kind. For mineral oil that starts at 140 F. So what happens after 140 F? Each 20 F cuts fluid life in half! Does using a Full Synthetic improve that? Yes! By how much? Depends on the base oil type and a few other factors. But enough to notice. Some esters are even higher. There are even synergies between types the will raise it higher than any one component is alone.    Then there is "Hindered" oils. Antioxidant additives. Hindered Polyol Esters can sit at 500 F for years in a turbine.   When a blender brags his oil will 'take 500 F" in service he doesn't specify for how long. Water will dance on a 500 F hot plate for several seconds. @newdude put up a chart showing the relationship between fluid temperature and it's life in an automatic transmission. Here's a version of that chart for Group III based oils. These temperatures are those in the pan as observed as 'normal'. that is you drive as you do for as long as you do under what load you ask of it and whatever that temperature is this graph applies to. Flash temperatures of a few minutes isn't what his means.    Note that fluids held at a constant 240 F have a service life of only 20K miles. 220 F explains the factory exchange limit, eh? My equipment I keep under 180 F and I'm good if the cooler will hold it as low as 140 F. But that's me.   
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...