Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2014 Silverado with 42K miles. On Sunday, I was pulling into the garage after a short errand and I lost most of the braking power. I was able to stop the truck by pressing the brake pedal hard. I immediately drove backwards and it did the same thing. I had it towed to a local mechanic on Monday to have the braking system checked out. They had it for about 4 hours and could not find anything wrong. They showed me an article how the ABS system can kick in if the system is over worked due to hot weather, driving up hills, frequent stops, etc. However, I just was away for 15 minutes: it's in lower 60s and I wasn't doing hills or frequent stops. The mechanic did 2 test drives and he told me the braking system was fine.

 

I carefully drove it to the GM dealership for a 2nd opinion and within 15 minutes they diagnosed it as a weak vacuum pump. It was only doing 10 in Hg and it should be doing 27 in Hg. My question is having a vacuum pump as part of a braking system exotic? Is this something a normal mechanic should have been able to diagnose? I found the TSB here by Googling vacuum and 12669488 as the part # which describes the problem perfectly: http://m.gm.oemdtc.com/TSB/SB-10081053-2280.pdf

 

I guess my worry is that this mechanic gave me a clean bill of health on the braking system which shakes my confidence in any future work he may do for me. Are these 2014+ Silverados just too new or specialized to be worked on by normal mechanics?

 

 

Posted

Short answer, no. You're local tech should have been able to check vaccum. However, these new trucks are very complex so it takes some understanding of how everything is integrated.

 

It's not getting any easier by any means

Posted (edited)

Hopefully they checked for oil/fluids in the vacuum pump lines...

 

#PIT5361B: Diagnostic Tip - Additional Brake Pedal Effort - (Jun 28, 2016)

 

The following diagnosis might be helpful if the vehicle exhibits the symptom(s) described in this PI.

Condition/Concern

In some rare situations, a customer may comment on a hard brake pedal or that increased effort is needed to depress the brake pedal. Also, in some cases a tick or ticking noise may be heard, which may sound like an exhaust manifold leak. While performing normal diagnostics, fluid may be found in the brake booster and/or the booster vacuum line.

 

Important: Pay close attention to the fluid and if it is determined to be engine oil, it could be coming from the vacuum pump. The vacuum pump is belt-driven and mounted to the side of the engine block. It is lubricated by pressurized engine oil.

Recommendation/Instructions

If engine oil is found, it is important the following parts are replaced. If not, the condition will return.

  1. Vacuum Pump
  2. Vacuum Line between the booster and the pump
  3. Brake Booster
  4. Master Cylinder
  5. Vacuum Pump Belt

 

Edited by 15HDriver
Posted

Yeah, I hope so too. I was reading one story where a guy's vacuum pump was defective and pushed back bits of metal back into the engine block and toasted it. Since the dealer did the repair they should be responsible if anything like that should happen.

Posted

Did you report this as a safety issue?

 

https://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov/VehicleComplaint/

 

Why would he need to do this? It's no different than losing the power steering pump and you have to actually use some muscle to steer. The vacuum pump just assists the breaks in that you don't have to push so hard on the pedal to apply the breaks. He never lost breaking just had to push the pedal harder to stop. Would it be surprising to be in this condition. Absolutely Yes however he has done the right thing and had it towed to the repair shop. Try letting your truck roll in neutral with the engine off. You have to press the breaks hard but, it will stop.

Posted

Vacuum pumps were on the earlier 2000 pickups IIRC... not really a rare system, or very complicated to check vacuum.

 

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

Posted

 

Why would he need to do this? It's no different than losing the power steering pump and you have to actually use some muscle to steer. The vacuum pump just assists the breaks in that you don't have to push so hard on the pedal to apply the breaks. He never lost breaking just had to push the pedal harder to stop. Would it be surprising to be in this condition. Absolutely Yes however he has done the right thing and had it towed to the repair shop. Try letting your truck roll in neutral with the engine off. You have to press the breaks hard but, it will stop.

Doesn't matter that you can figure out how to stop in this situation. It is a safety issue and if systematic should be a safety recall. Reporting the issue to NHTSA can help force an investigation.

Posted

I hope this doesn't sidetrack this thread, but I was unaware that these trucks had a vacuum pump. The engine doesn't develop enough vacuum on it's own?

Posted

I hope this doesn't sidetrack this thread, but I was unaware that these trucks had a vacuum pump. The engine doesn't develop enough vacuum on it's own?

 

AFM is why. It allowed them to change the AFM so it runs more with low/no load. When you drop 4 cylinders, you drop your vacuum supply. Helps for added brake assist to increase pedal feel over the last gen as well.

  • Like 1
Posted

Doesn't matter that you can figure out how to stop in this situation. It is a safety issue and if systematic should be a safety recall. Reporting the issue to NHTSA can help force an investigation.

 

I fail to see is why it's a safety issue. The breaking system Never failed. You just have to press the pedal harder. When the power steering pump goes out it's a safety issue to? You don't lose steering just the assistance to turn the wheel easier.

  • 5 months later...
Posted (edited)

This happened to me today. Ordering a new pump. I can tell you this, you have to push down really hard to bring these to a stop. I assume they included them in the engine because they drop to 4 cyl. What a pain, 43K miles and my brakes go out, I wonder how many lawsuits they are going to get from this? Also, the power steering is mentioned as a defense. Big difference, braking is way above PS in importance. I litterally braked, turned and then barely stopped before hitting a car. I had no warning, and I am a big guy.

Edited by montytx
  • Thanks 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

Same thing happened to me yesterday. Very heavy and hard pedal when parking or applying brakes several times at low speed. 2014 Chev Silverado, 5.3 V8, 42K miles. Chev dealership diagnosed it today, vacuum pump not pulling enough vacuum. Seems a common fault...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...