Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am a little confused . In TSB # 15829 It says it covers 2014 models and in the other TSB #PI1513A it says the 2014 are not covered ?

TSB #1513 is on 2014

TSB#1513A is on 2015 powertrain warranty

#15829 special coverage is on 2014 5year 100000 miles

not sure if the special coverage supersedes the #1513

Posted (edited)

just an FYI. not all 2014 trucks are included.

 

my 2014 gmc 1500 with 37500 miles has the smell also. Was at the dealer 1/26/17. Was told radiator is the issue. 1200.00 repair to replace radiator and thermostat, coolant ect.

long story short mine was assembled in mexico and is not included in a tsb. or special coverage for radiator leak. REALLY!!!

I'm really surprised the radiator isn't part of the drive train warranty. That's nuts.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Edited by Tom Boswell
Posted

Ok .. Thanks Ron .. Im going to bring this up next time I take it in for a oil change . I have noticed the coolant smell for some time now and it seems like the over flow bottle is slowly going down .

Posted

Isn't the radiator part of the drive train warranty?

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I am told from 2 different dealers that its 3/36. Why im not sure why. #1513a for 2015 is powertrain. It feels like run around.

Posted

If for some reason it needs replaced I bought the extended warranty if for some reason they won't cover it under the TSB.

Posted

If for some reason it needs replaced I bought the extended warranty if for some reason they won't cover it under the TSB.

My want to have your dealer ck the vin to see if it is included in the TSB. I was charged $100.00 for diagnostics to verify it was the radiator. Cause mine was not u.s. Assembled. Funny thing is I was told Before I even dropped the truck off it was powertain warranty. it's a long story.

Posted

This is the answer I got from gmc customer service. Truly Ridiculous.

The letter that I received back in November stated that if I already got my radiator fix somewhere else I can get refunded the money from GM I no longer have the letter anymore

Posted

The letter that I received back in November stated that if I already got my radiator fix somewhere else I can get refunded the money from GM I no longer have the letter anymore

I was told to keep my receipts and if gm decided to include other vin's than I could be reimbursed. (must be done by gmc dealer) the special coverage is only a couple months old.

Posted

Dang it whomever bought my 2014 that I traded in has this problem (sorry dude whomever you are) it would steam a bit from under the front of the hood at times. Dealer said it was NORMAL they just added a bit of antifreeze at oil change time as needed LOL. These forums are great you can find out all kinds of stuff if you search around a bit.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I have a 2014 regular cab Z71 and I have smelled coolant and noticed a slow drain from the reservoir tank for some time . I didn't receive the letter that some of you did and my dealership service dept. said there was nothing on this issued for my truck according to my vin. I gave her the TSB number that was on this thread . She called today and said the radiator was leaking after a pressure test and that they replaced the radiator and thermostat . So for everyone who has smelled coolant but didn't get a letter you prolly still could have this issue.

Edited by 355HP Z71
  • 2 months later...
Posted

been smelling coolant now for some time. 45k miles and late 14 model. Ill call the dealership tomorrow but in the meantime is it possible to see this on my own? I went out with a flashlight and looked in the upper corners and didn't see any different stain color but I also dont know if its possible to see it from in front of the grill.

Posted

I have a 15 Sierra that had coolant smell. Had radiator replaced a month or two ago. Never saw and cracks or leaks. Dealer said it was leaking. Mine was due to thermostat.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

I bought a used 2014 Silverado, noticed the coolant smell since I purchased it. I finally found this information about the radiator and TSB 15829. I called GM customer service and was told my VIN was not affected. Took the truck to the dealer I never mentioned the TSB, so I do not know if they are aware of it or not. So after checking it they told me the radiator was leaking where the head meets the tubes like the TSB states, they told me since I was out of the 3/36 it would be $1200 to replace the the just radiator. I called GM customer service back opened a case and demanded that they have someone go out to verify whether my truck has the same issue covered by the TSB. Was told a senior adviser would contact me in 48 hours (still waiting on the call). Within 45 minutes of the call to GM the dealer called me back and stated GM contacted them and told them if I paid a $500 deductible GM would cover the rest.

 

I thought it was fair half price, but point being if your told your not covered it may be worth it to complain to GM and open a case you may be able to do better. Them making that offer tells me they know the problem affects more vehicles, and lets face it by taking the deal it saves them from reimbursing the $1200 if and when they include other vehicles like mine. Of course i'm sure I forfeit the reimbursement of the $500 by doing this. Oh and by the way mine was made in Mexico.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...