Jump to content

Travel trailer recommendations


Donstar

Recommended Posts

Posted

Everyone keeps saying that the nht trucks are the way to go... has one noticed that it reduces your cargo capacity but over 200 lbs? If you are running out of cargo capacity in a 1500 the only way to go is a 2500.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Everyone keeps saying that the nht trucks are the way to go... has one noticed that it reduces your cargo capacity but over 200 lbs? If you are running out of cargo capacity in a 1500 the only way to go is a 2500.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It does? My trucks towing capacity is 9,600lbs. Same truck with the NHT package is 10,600lbs, iirc.

 

All I know is a close friend has the identical truck to mine except he has the NHT package. He lent it to me to pull my travel trailer one weekend and the difference was ASTOUNDING.

 

Now, the difference between the two trucks when pulling something lighter like say my three place inline snowmobile trailer, isn't really too much of a difference in feel.

Posted

It does? My trucks towing capacity is 9,600lbs. Same truck with the NHT package is 10,600lbs, iirc.

 

All I know is a close friend has the identical truck to mine except he has the NHT package. He lent it to me to pull my travel trailer one weekend and the difference was ASTOUNDING.

 

Now, the difference between the two trucks when pulling something lighter like say my three place inline snowmobile trailer, isn't really too much of a difference in feel.

He's not talking overall trailer capacity, the truck itself runs out of carrying capacity between passengers and hitch weight...

 

 

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Posted

Yeah. My 5.3 v8 doesn't pull locomotives but it pulls my jayco with some authority. I'm sure with a 6.2 and shorter rear end it would pull the paint off the sides. Next truck will be a 2500 diesel.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Everyone keeps saying that the nht trucks are the way to go... has one noticed that it reduces your cargo capacity but over 200 lbs? If you are running out of cargo capacity in a 1500 the only way to go is a 2500.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Nope. NHT adds ~400 lbs payload.

 

page 32 of this https://www.gm.ca/media/vehicles/current/gmc/sierra/2015_Sierra_Brochure_EN.pdf shows the payload capacity for the 1500's.

 

For mine (CC, 4X4 Short box) with a 3.42 it's 1820 and with a 3.73 (NHT) it's 2210.

 

My sticker shows 2015 lbs. Loaded up last year I was within 50 lbs of that number.

 

For comparison, I've seen 2500HD with the Duramax at around 2300 lbs. Better towing vehicle, but still easy to hit the payload number.

Posted

 

Nope. NHT adds ~400 lbs payload.

 

page 32 of this https://www.gm.ca/media/vehicles/current/gmc/sierra/2015_Sierra_Brochure_EN.pdf shows the payload capacity for the 1500's.

 

For mine (CC, 4X4 Short box) with a 3.42 it's 1820 and with a 3.73 (NHT) it's 2210.

 

My sticker shows 2015 lbs. Loaded up last year I was within 50 lbs of that number.

 

For comparison, I've seen 2500HD with the Duramax at around 2300 lbs. Better towing vehicle, but still easy to hit the payload number.

Not sure where you got you numbers from, but a Duramax 2500hd is 3500# and a 6.0l is even higher.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Posted

Not sure where you got you numbers from, but a Duramax 2500hd is 3500# and a 6.0l is even higher.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

https://www.gm.ca/media/vehicles/current/gmc/sierra-denali/2015_Sierra_HD_Brochure_EN.pdf

 

Brochure payload for a 2500 HD Crew Cab 4x4 Std box is 2628, or ~ 400 lb more than the brochure payload for my truck. Talking to others who have one and what their stickers show, it's around 2300 lbs. Yes it is higher with a 6.0l

Posted

1c1d4c5213dbbe20ed8a0fcb5def2b63.jpg

 

Really...?

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

My 2012 is 3400# with 4wd and crew cab from what I remember?

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Posted

Everyone keeps saying that the nht trucks are the way to go... has one noticed that it reduces your cargo capacity but over 200 lbs?

 

Yes, I think somebody told it to you backwards. The NHT option adds 400 lbs to your GVWR, Payload as well as rear GAWR (since 2015, the 2014's didn't get the increase).

 

 

My 2012 is 3400# with 4wd and crew cab from what I remember?

 

Please take a look at your sticker. Generic internet numbers are often the max possible. A Crew Cab 4X4 Duramax 2500 will generally weigh around 7400-7500 lbs. So unless they've increased the GVWR to 11,000 lbs 3500 isn't happening.

Posted

 

Yes, I think somebody told it to you backwards. The NHT option adds 400 lbs to your GVWR, Payload as well as rear GAWR (since 2015, the 2014's didn't get the increase).

 

 

 

Please take a look at your sticker. Generic internet numbers are often the max possible. A Crew Cab 4X4 Duramax 2500 will generally weigh around 7400-7500 lbs. So unless they've increased the GVWR to 11,000 lbs 3500 isn't happening.

I have a gasser...

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Posted

Even in that brochure, the Duramax is over 3k...at least the part I'm looking at.

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Posted

And your brochure number is for a CNG engine, not a gas or a diesel...

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

No.

 

Going from page 36. Clearly Diesel 4x4 CC long box is 2628 LB, 1192 KG.

 

I'll take the brochure # over Google response any day.

Posted

Is your truck a 8 foot bed crew cab? Compare apples to apples, not the best number to try to sell your point...

 

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Posted

If yours is gas, it will have higher (but 3500 would still surprise me). A better source from when GM first started rating per SAE J2807:

 

http://media.gm.com/content/media/us/en/gmc/vehicles/sierra_hd/2016/_jcr_content/iconrow/textfile/file.res/16-PG-GMC-Sierra-HD-062716.pdf

 

Page 17:

 

 

Crew cab, 6’ 6” (4WD): 6.0L: 2942 6.6L: 2583

 

But keep in mind those are max numbers. The number you end up with on your sticker after all options are weighed up is usually less.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 349 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...