Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Some say they notice it, and some say they don't. I believe that some trucks behave differently than others, and I also believe some people are considerably more in tune with their vehicles than others. My '14 was horrible, especially when combined with the clunking, hesitating, flair shifting transmission. It drove me back to a '13 2500HD as soon as it financially made sense. I won't purchase another new truck with any kind of cylinder deactivation.

 

Edit: By the way, when I shut off AFM both with the Range device my mileage was exactly the same. Ultimately when I shut if off with a tuner, my mileage increased by 1 mpg.

Edited by Newell33
  • Like 1
Posted

I may be in the minority but I LOVE my AFM. It's one of the reasons I bought the truck. It definitely improves fuel mileage and I don't notice it switching in and out. I do a lot of highway driving and once I get up to around 55-65 and am just cruising along it switches to V4. But it's nice to know I have the V8 available as soon as I need it (and I use that mode often too)!

  • Like 1
Posted

If AFM allows GM to claim .1 MPG and keep producing my beloved V8 I'm not against it. As long as its still modifiable feature to those that choose not to have it. AFM off = Wonky shifting gone.

Posted

I'm more than good with the AFM in my 2015 1500. No switching issues. No oil usage. No blues. Smooth as a kitten. Just clicked over 19K on the clock. 5993 miles, 240.677 gallons = 24.90 MPG. What's not to like? :driving:

  • Like 1
Posted

I hated it. I could feel the surges at low speeds from the torque converter locking and unlocking with the transition from v4-v8. Got a range and the truck is MUCH more enjoyable to drive.

  • Like 1
Posted

... I am probably the only one these forums who is 100% happy GM is using AFM and not 6cyl turbo@! ...

 

You're not the only one.

Because it's easier to turn of AFM than adding two cylinders.

 

so long

j-ten-ner

  • Like 3
Posted

I hated it. I could feel the surges at low speeds from the torque converter locking and unlocking with the transition from v4-v8. Got a range and the truck is MUCH more enjoyable to drive.

Did you take your truck in under warranty for service when it was having these problems? The transition from V4 - V8 is designed to be seamless. This was the case with my previous V8 and is with my current V6. If you did take it for service I am curious as to what the service adviser said about this issue.

Posted

Did you take your truck in under warranty for service when it was having these problems? The transition from V4 - V8 is designed to be seamless. This was the case with my previous V8 and is with my current V6. If you did take it for service I am curious as to what the service adviser said about this issue.

Nope. Following the AFM thread, I am not the only one with these issues.

Posted (edited)

Nope. Following the AFM thread, I am not the only one with these issues.

Do I understand this to mean that you didn't get the problem fixed or have I misunderstood? I believe that this feature is designed to work seamlessly. I did a 125km return trip on the highway today and tried to determine when my truck was switching in and out of V4 mode. I could not do it without looking at the DIC. I would be sure to mention this issue to your service adviser while your vehicle is still under warranty. No need to put up with faulty components when under warranty!

Edited by Donstar
Posted (edited)

Taken from the AFM thread, fits my feelings perfectly and I have had a 2015 Sierra and 2016 Sierra while test driving at least 10 others...

 

"I think the debate regarding feeling the V4 is somewhat truck dependent and somewhat user feel. I think some trucks' V4 switching is a bit smoother than others. But I think some people are also more in tune with the changes that take place when the truck changes to V4...from the change in engine sound, the subtle back pressure that happens when it goes into V4, the change in the exhaust note, etc. I bet more often than not I can tell on any of your trucks when it's going into V4 mode without looking at the indicator on the dash. Sometimes it's hard to detect but most of the time I feel it and I also feel it way more in this truck than I ever did in my 2007."

Edited by JacobC1983
Posted

Do I understand this to mean that you didn't get the problem fixed or have I misunderstood? I believe that this feature is designed to work seamlessly. I did a 125km return trip on the highway today and tried to determine when my truck was switching in and out of V4 mode. I could not do it without looking at the DIC. I would be sure to mention this issue to your service adviser while your vehicle is still under warranty. No need to put up with faulty components when under warranty!

 

No offense... but I bet I feel it on your truck too.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

No offense... but I bet I feel it on your truck too.

Definitely no offence taken. If you could feel it on my truck and it demonstrates the same "surge" feel that you hate, I would be questioning you and not the truck! (lol) I don't doubt that your truck or others may have a faulty component. My point is for you to get it fixed if it is broken. Shortly after buying my truck, my front left signal light quit working. I didn't blame GM or hate my truck, I got it fixed. If you Google "left signal light not working" you get over 3 million hits. It is easy to find others that share a complaint. I doubt that you'd have a concern for this feature if it was working as intended!

Posted

I have a '14 Sierra with the 5.3 & 25K miles. I check my oil regularly and haven't noticed any oil use at all.

Gotta say I'm very pleased with the overall performance of this engine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Sure, but they do have some affordable options like the Trax, Trailblazer, Envista, and Encore. Some of these have a cheaper base price than the Civic, though the fuel economy isn’t as high. The main problem is that people WANT the highest trim with all the goodies and finance for like 7 years. That’s how ppl “afford” the more expensive vehicles. 
    • Holy s**t - not much of a parts thrower you say? You BLASTED that thing with the parts cannon!  You'd have been probably $1,000 ahead if you had just brought it to a competent shop rather than shotgunning a bunch of parts it clearly didn't need.   Just FYI - oil additives are really, REALLY good at ONE thing ... and that's emptying your wallet. They're ALL useless gimmicks.   If that has the L94 or L99, then #7 is an AFM cylinder. I'd suspect a failed lifter in that case.   If you leaned on wiring, sensors, and/or connectors while changing the oil, you'll have to check all that to be sure pins didn't get pulled out, connectors broken, etc.. Old wire loom that was barely adequate when new is certainly brittle by year 19 - make sure wires aren't chaffed and shorting out somewhere where you might have leaned. or supported yourself on it.   If your a mechanic, why didn't you just find out what you were missing and troubleshoot from there??  TIMED spark, fuel PSI / injector pulse, air, compression.  Can't make ANY money going the parts cannon route.
    • LOL! Are you joking?? That wax SUCKS! 100% gimmick made to "look" good.    After just TWO winters I had severe surface rusting in patches over 90% of the frame. Only reason it looks great in the pics is because I SATURATED the frame every single fall with used motor oil for 14 of the 16 years I owned it. Otherwise it would've been sent to the crusher 8 years earlier with the speed it was rusting prior!    I sold that POS 3 years ago. Was a gigantic headache the second it rolled off the showroom floor. Brakes pulsated on the TEST DRIVE. Door trim fell off the 1st week! Interior squeaked and rattled, and the drivetrain clunked after 2k miles. 4x4 switch failed shortly after. Front end - ball joints, struts, hub bearings - all failed between 38k-50k. Engine started burning oil at 50k. Rear and and transmission failed before 100k. Nothing but problems, and frustration with the piss-poor engineering designed to make you give up. Well, it worked! Nothing on that truck was easy to remove ... except the wheels. They haven't figured out how to screw that up yet. Give 'em time ...   I won't make that mistake again. EVER.   Such fond memories ... https://postimg.cc/K1qf23tS  https://postimg.cc/gallery/X02z64J  https://postimg.cc/gallery/mHSRXZv  https://postimg.cc/gallery/D4mMRfL
    • Different monitors do their test only under conditions specific to that monitor.  you MIGHT find the drive cycle conditions for the monitor that isn't ready on this site: https://lemon-manuals.la/   If it's not there, then it should be on alldata.com for your truck, but it requires a paid subscription.   And you need to know which specific monitor isn't ready.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...