Jump to content

Cylinder Deactivation Issues?

VeronaGMC
 Share

Recommended Posts

Gotsumpnferya Enthusiast

Gotsumpnferya

Posted
Posted

I'm a bit conflicted about AFM . It is very dependent upon your driving style and load whether it is active . I drive the truck normally

95% of the time , but from time to time like to open the throttle and feel that V8 pull . On the highway trips , I don't mind

the V4 activation as long as it isn't causing undue wear on the components and that it is actually saving gas .

I'm trying to be confident with the evolution of these engines over the last several years that they've eliminated most issues ,

but the ticking I get at cold idle (post in another thread) has me cautious .

I live in the mountains of W NC and have driven many of the roads here which is fun , but I don't care for the AFM

coming on during those times .

 

I thought about one of the AFM disabler , but if I'm going to apply the money towards one , why not apply that

to a tuner so I can approach the transmission constantly trying to find the right gear or lugging as well ?

 

What I'd like is to have economy when I want it . I just wish GM had given us the option .

So hopefully a tuner will help with that once warranty is out . It's hard not pulling the trigger now .

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

pickmeup
pickmeup

One simple button with a choice . Economy or Sport mode . I believe it would have saved many many complaints .

j-ten-ner
j-ten-ner

You're not the only one. Because it's easier to turn of AFM than adding two cylinders.   so long j-ten-ner

Grumpy Bear
Grumpy Bear

Well I can see the difference right away. I don't have much flat ground and around here, Chicago area big wind is life. That said. Being on and staying on is quite something else. Yea, it turns on but

Loco-diablo Senior Enthusiast

Loco-diablo

Posted
Posted

In the 6 weeks/3000 miles I owned my 5.3 AFM, I must say I'm very happy with it's seamless operation. I see it go from 4>8 and 8>4 but it's barely noticeable imo. I have no desire to inactivate it or modify it. So far, so good.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Orlando8 Enthusiast

Orlando8

Posted
Posted

In the 6 weeks/3000 miles I owned my 5.3 AFM, I must say I'm very happy with it's seamless operation. I see it go from 4>8 and 8>4 but it's barely noticeable imo. I have no desire to inactivate it or modify it. So far, so good.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

:thumbs:

  • Like 1
B_SKY33 Enthusiast

B_SKY33

Posted
Posted

Very first thing I did was by a tuner and turn off the AFM, I don't like it or need it. Not to mention the exhaust sounds terrible when it goes into V4 mode. I've heard a lot of guys run the Range AFM disable tool but have had issues with it because it stays plugged into the OBD2 unlike a tuner.

dorkweed Enthusiast

dorkweed

Posted
Posted

Very first thing I did was by a tuner and turn off the AFM, I don't like it or need it. Not to mention the exhaust sounds terrible when it goes into V4 mode. I've heard a lot of guys run the Range AFM disable tool but have had issues with it because it stays plugged into the OBD2 unlike a tuner.

 

 

Not if you use one of these handy things..........................http://www.ebay.com/itm/OBD-2-Cord-16-Pin-Cable-Power-Switch-M-F-Right-Angle-ODB-II-Diagnostic-Splitter-/291761971818

  • Like 1
Nanotech Environmental Enthusiast

Nanotech Environmental

Posted
Posted

I'm a bit conflicted about AFM . It is very dependent upon your driving style and load whether it is active . I drive the truck normally

95% of the time , but from time to time like to open the throttle and feel that V8 pull . On the highway trips , I don't mind

the V4 activation as long as it isn't causing undue wear on the components and that it is actually saving gas .

I'm trying to be confident with the evolution of these engines over the last several years that they've eliminated most issues ,

but the ticking I get at cold idle (post in another thread) has me cautious .

I live in the mountains of W NC and have driven many of the roads here which is fun , but I don't care for the AFM

coming on during those times .

 

I thought about one of the AFM disabler , but if I'm going to apply the money towards one , why not apply that

to a tuner so I can approach the transmission constantly trying to find the right gear or lugging as well ?

 

What I'd like is to have economy when I want it . I just wish GM had given us the option .

So hopefully a tuner will help with that once warranty is out . It's hard not pulling the trigger now .

(underlined)

GM did give you that option. That's why AFM exists. When you want fuel econ, drive with a light foot and let the AFM work in your favor. When you want to giver, just do so. V4 only comes on during lighter loads, so it's not like it gets in the way when trying to pass, or accelerate up a hill or whatever hard throttle application you can think of. It doesn't get in your way, at all, ever.

Gotsumpnferya Enthusiast

Gotsumpnferya

Posted
Posted

(underlined)

GM did give you that option. That's why AFM exists. When you want fuel econ, drive with a light foot and let the AFM work in your favor. When you want to giver, just do so. V4 only comes on during lighter loads, so it's not like it gets in the way when trying to pass, or accelerate up a hill or whatever hard throttle application you can think of. It doesn't get in your way, at all, ever.

You're right , it doesn't get it the way , however it does come on at times when I don't want it to . Constant cycling on and off during mountain driving gets annoying , no matter how seamless others may find it . I don't feel as if I have to ride around in M5 all the time to get rid of it . The grade braking feature shouldn't reset during an ignition cycle either . It should be my choice .

 

Say you're in a boat or aircraft , and you're coming through a bad inlet or takeoff or landing , and some feature kicks in changing applicable power in some way at a time you don't want it .

 

Wouldn't you want the option of disabling that feature ? I know I would .

lloydsmale Enthusiast

lloydsmale

Posted
Posted

Question. If I buy a diablo tuner will it allow me to shut the cyl deactivation off at only high speeds? I heard the hypertech does but they don't make one for the 17s. Id like to set it for 60mph and eliminate it kicking in and out around town. Also if I have the 87 oct canned tune installed and cylinder deactivation shut off and go in for service and put the stock tune back in so the dealer doesn't see it do I first have to turn the cutout back on before I install the stock tune or does it automatically come back on with the stock tune?

Nanotech Environmental Enthusiast

Nanotech Environmental

Posted
Posted (edited)

You're right , it doesn't get it the way , however it does come on at times when I don't want it to . Constant cycling on and off during mountain driving gets annoying , no matter how seamless others may find it . I don't feel as if I have to ride around in M5 all the time to get rid of it . The grade braking feature shouldn't reset during an ignition cycle either . It should be my choice .

 

Say you're in a boat or aircraft , and you're coming through a bad inlet or takeoff or landing , and some feature kicks in changing applicable power in some way at a time you don't want it .

 

Wouldn't you want the option of disabling that feature ? I know I would .

Why are you choosing to get annoyed with it?

 

When your truck floats or flies, then you can worry about it. Until then.......... ;)

Edited by 3beejay3
  • Like 1
Loco-diablo Senior Enthusiast

Loco-diablo

Posted
Posted

As mentioned, I find the AFM operation pretty seamless, but that's not to say the owner shouldn't have the choice to disable it.

I absolutely believe that GM should allow you to turn it off if so desired. Government/EPA red tape I'm sure.

B_SKY33 Enthusiast

B_SKY33

Posted
Posted

Question. If I buy a diablo tuner will it allow me to shut the cyl deactivation off at only high speeds? I heard the hypertech does but they don't make one for the 17s. Id like to set it for 60mph and eliminate it kicking in and out around town. Also if I have the 87 oct canned tune installed and cylinder deactivation shut off and go in for service and put the stock tune back in so the dealer doesn't see it do I first have to turn the cutout back on before I install the stock tune or does it automatically come back on with the stock tune?

Hypertech now has a tune available for the 2017's. The AFM settings on it allow you to set it up for certain speeds or disable it completely.Its very easy to put it back to stock (less than 5 min). I actually am selling my Hypertech if you're interested, it's part#2000 that I tested on a 2017 Silverado. Save you some money if thats what you're looking for

Thomcat Senior Enthusiast

Thomcat

Posted
Posted (edited)

I agree mostly, I got 16MPG with my 73 Impala 454 with a 373 rear......

Unfortunately 1973 was not 1974. The 4-6 mpg on my '74 Impala 454 was a different animal not only because I didn't buy the largest engine to drive like granny to save gas, but Uncle Sam had a lot to say about it. The1974 model year - Oil Embargo - gas lines - odd/even plates - gasoline theft from parked vehicles! That was the banner year when the Gov't severely increased air pollution requirements and thus introduction of new experimental vacuum operated gizmos to please Uncle Sam while choking the engine and wasting gas at the same time. Even Chrysler had enough brains to at least introduce electronic ignition - but not '74 GM. Worst year to buy a new Chevy mpg wise, increased weight, coupled with jacka$$ safety standards like the infamous short lived driver seat belt ignition interlock and (tail lights out of the bumper in favor of heavier super duper 10 mph impact bumpers on gas pistons. The best was the low mounted gas filler with vented cap located behind the license plate....more than 3/4 fill in the gas tank and with every fast start and stop you wash the rear bumper with 1/4 gal. gas. But, even at $1/gal. it's poor gas mileage was worth it - the best riding car I ever owned - my less than 1/2 the weight '17 Impala is a cracker box by comparison..

Edited by Thomcat
  • Like 1
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

Unfortunately 1973 was not 1974. The 4-6 mpg on my '74 Impala 454 was a different animal not only because I didn't buy the largest engine to drive like granny to save gas, but Uncle Sam had a lot to say about it. The1974 model year - Oil Embargo - gas lines - odd/even plates - gasoline theft from parked vehicles! That was the banner year when the Gov't severely increased air pollution requirements and thus introduction of new experimental vacuum operated gizmos to please Uncle Sam while choking the engine and wasting gas at the same time. Even Chrysler had enough brains to at least introduce electronic ignition - but not '74 GM. Worst year to buy a new Chevy mpg wise, increased weight, coupled with jacka$$ safety standards like the infamous short lived driver seat belt ignition interlock and (tail lights out of the bumper in favor of heavier super duper 10 mph impact bumpers on gas pistons. The best was the low mounted gas filler with vented cap located behind the license plate....more than 3/4 fill in the gas tank and with every fast start and stop you wash the rear bumper with 1/4 gal. gas. But, even at $1/gal. it's poor gas mileage was worth it - the best riding car I ever owned - my less than 1/2 the weight '17 Impala is a cracker box by comparison..

My mistake mine was a 74, factory 350-350-273 rear. I had a salvage yard at the time. I put a built 454 in it and a 373 posi. Later a transmission shop owner friend was experimenting with the 700R4 which my car was the giny pig. My wife's DD in the 80s. I even drag raced it a few times 14.7 was the best on street tires. I later put the 454 in a 76 nova.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Newell33 Enthusiast

Newell33

Posted
Posted

(underlined)

GM did give you that option. That's why AFM exists. When you want fuel econ, drive with a light foot and let the AFM work in your favor. When you want to giver, just do so. V4 only comes on during lighter loads, so it's not like it gets in the way when trying to pass, or accelerate up a hill or whatever hard throttle application you can think of. It doesn't get in your way, at all, ever.

 

You understand that the AFM transition is not seamless in every truck, right? You may be one of the lucky ones, but others have serious lugging, hesitation, and transmission clunking concerns during AFM operation. I'm a reasonable guy, and if I wasn't able to turn AFM off on my '14, I would have taken a bath and traded it right away. Yes, it was that bad.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • GAMark
      Road Master Active Suspension

      By GAMark · Posted

      Has anyone run these on their 2500?
    • Erfar
      Oil Change

      By Erfar · Posted

      have you stuck with dealer oil changes since then? I made the same switch after getting tired of crawling around under the truck, but I’ve found some dealers are way better than others about getting you in quickly. Curious if yours has been good about scheduling or if you’ve had to look elsewhere for quicker turnaround.
    • cherryred21duramax
      Can anyone decode a VIN to determine if this truck has had emissions issues or a recall?

      By cherryred21duramax · Posted

      Thank you.   I am set on a 3.0 Duramax as my previous truck with a Ford Ecoboost had just as many, if not more, "common" issues.  Cam phasers, timing chain issues, 10-speed valve body and CDF drum, emissions issues, etc.  So I figured, why not get 2x the fuel mileage (these things got 27+mpg on every mixed city/highway test drive I put them through) and better towing capability with resale value to boot?   My minimum, shortest trip will be 50 miles 1-way and I regularly go out of state with a travel trailer.  I'm planning on using this for a marketing/event promotion business also, which would require regular towing of trailers for bands, DJs, sound and lighting gear, along with my personal camera gear for filming events.   Looked at other trucks in the $30k+ price range but the issues seem to be everywhere, plus too many with gaudy mods.  I'm literally sticking with RWD trucks because they tend to be actually used as trucks, vs. the 4x4 models I've seen with unsafe lifts, huge tires, and general mods that would affect reliability (I'm wondering if some of them were tuned, hence the aggressive throttle response and hard shifting).   So my goal is to find a stock, 3.0 with 1 or 2 owners, in good physical condition, and decently well maintained.  Can't seem to find that up here, everything in the $27-30k range has had multiple owners, smoke smell, issues, or body damage.  Or the ridiculously modified trucks with 80k miles for under $27k but lots of problems...
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      That’s pretty tough Grumpy. I reread the previous few posts. They all reference oil changes. Much like your last thread. In my humble opinion it keeps things interesting.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...