Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
The Genesis and Stinger came around 20+ years later.  (The Stinger is awesome) Why do people continue to compare performance and crap of modern day vehicles to those of vehicles 20+ years ago!?  Hell a 2012 Impala ex-glorified rental car with the 3.5L V6 has more HP and is faster than a 1996 Impala and a 1993 Camaro Z28!  So what!?  They were great cars back then, they still are.  But they were built for a different time.  20 years from now, if we are not dead or flying around or driving around in self autonomous vehicles I'm betting many of us will look back and say.. "My 2019 Silverado- as ugly ass as it is- was a great truck.  But my 2040 Geo pickup can easily outperform it."

You missed the point, I know you’re young [emoji2960]There’s a market for performance rear drive sedans. GM used to be the masters at this. I’ve had plenty of them. Even raced some. The Asian rear drives are nice. I would have rather stayed with GM. Would have had plenty of access to performance parts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
4 hours ago, HondaHawkGT said:

That help, true. But if you look at the sales data for the last 4 or 5 years, Toyota has kept a strict limit on how many Tundras they build and sell. I think they strictly limit how many they build to keep their Cafe numbers in check. Either way, the only reason AFM/MDS/small turbocharged engines are used in half-tons is because of CAFE.

So Toyota is purposely steering the consumer away from purchasing high profit Tundra’s because of limited availability?   One would think that Toyota with such an expansive lineup of high mileage vehicles, they could sell a million Tundra’s a year and it wouldn’t put a dent in their CAFE numbers.  

 

Sounds like GM is putting all of their eggs in one basket.  If they miscalculate, all GM has to do is tell Uncle Sam they are too big to fail and big government will gladly fork over another $50 billion taxpayer funded bailout to keep them afloat for another 10 years.  Is GM thriving or merely surviving......

Posted
26 minutes ago, 1997SierraSLT said:

So Toyota is purposely steering the consumer away from purchasing high profit Tundra’s because of limited availability?   One would think that Toyota with such an expansive lineup of high mileage vehicles, they could sell a million Tundra’s a year and it wouldn’t put a dent in their CAFE numbers.  

 

Sounds like GM is putting all of their eggs in one basket.  If they miscalculate, all GM has to do is tell Uncle Sam they are too big to fail and big government will gladly fork over another $50 billion taxpayer funded bailout to keep them afloat for another 10 years.  Is GM thriving or merely surviving......

 

Maybe you should look at the data before commenting. Note how Tundra sales have been oddly flat since 2013. Also, GM hasn't put any more "eggs in one basket" than other manufacturers. They still sell sedans in the US, unlike FCA or Ford. What exactly does any of that have to do with AFM/DFM again?

 

2004 11,720
2005 126,529
2006 124,508
2007 196,555
2008 134,249
2009 79,385
2010 93,309
2011 82,908
2012 101,621
2013 112,732
2014 118,493
2015 118,880
2016 114,489
2017 116,285

2018

 

           

118,258

 

 

Posted
12 hours ago, lew-e said:

I don’t personally hate afm... on the highway. When I drive in town I put it on m5 to avoid the awful lugging around 42 mph. I wouldn’t mind tuning it to come on at 60+ only. But I think when things start getting bad I’ll just full on delete the SOB

AFM was awful in my 2014. The new DFM system is amazing though. I can barely tell it's doing anything. Plus 25 to 28 MPG highway is pretty amazing.

Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, KARNUT said:


I put about 2 million miles behind the wheel of a pickup for work. Some very nice ones. Probably why I’m tired of them. I sure like performance sedans though. My wife’s car is fun. I think about it versus the cost of a pickup. In my humble opinion no contest. I realize I’m in the minority on that one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I was talking about this with a friend of mine the other day (we both own Silverados). He asked if I get sick of driving a truck and want to purchase a sedan (he's buying a Dodge Charger for a second vehicle), and I told him, well not really because my commute is a lot different than yours. I just get on the highway and go...easy driving, no stop and starts, don't have to park it in crowded parks lots, etc. But I must say if I DID have to use it like that? Yeah I'd get tired of it.

 

And I do think a car or smaller SUV could be fun at times...especially for around town stuff...doing errands, going shopping, going out to dinner. I used to use my truck for that and it was a bit of a pain trying to find parking spots that I wouldn't be hanging the rear end out into the street...or having to worry about hitting something in tight quarters. Stuff like that, it's just so much easier in something smaller - you can effortlessly whip it around those parking lots - and you can drive faster and fun.

Edited by Doublebase
  • Like 1
Posted
I was talking about this with a friend of mine the other day (we both own Silverados). He asked if I get sick of driving a truck and want to purchase a sedan (he's buying a Dodge Charger for a second vehicle), and I told him, well not really because my commute is a lot different than yours. I just get on the highway and go...easy driving, no stop and starts, don't have to park it in crowded parks lots, etc. But I must say if I DID have to use it like that? Yeah I'd get tired of it.
 
And I do think a car or smaller SUV could be fun at times...especially for around town stuff...doing errands, going shopping, going out to dinner. I used to use my truck for that and it was a bit of a pain trying to find parking spots that I wouldn't be hanging the rear end out into the street...or having to worry about hitting something in tight quarters. Stuff like that, it's just so much easier in something smaller - you can effortlessly whip it around those parking lots - and you can drive faster and fun.

I have an older truck I bought off E-bay. It’s basically like an old sedan. It’s lowered and very fast. My trip vehicle is a left over Camry. Between the two I have 33K invested. My wife’s car is a sport sedan. 2011 we bought as CPO still with the 10-10 warranty. It’s still under warranty. It’s fully loaded has features GM still doesn’t offer. Add that we have 60K invested. About the cost of a high country. It’s not that I dislike trucks. There’s just better options. You’re friends charger gas savings will possibly cover his lunch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
10 hours ago, KARNUT said:


I have an older truck I bought off E-bay. It’s basically like an old sedan. It’s lowered and very fast. My trip vehicle is a left over Camry. Between the two I have 33K invested. My wife’s car is a sport sedan. 2011 we bought as CPO still with the 10-10 warranty. It’s still under warranty. It’s fully loaded has features GM still doesn’t offer. Add that we have 60K invested. About the cost of a high country. It’s not that I dislike trucks. There’s just better options. You’re friends charger gas savings will possibly cover his lunch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What's your wife's car? 

Posted
16 hours ago, KARNUT said:


Genesis


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I owned a Lexus LS460 for five years, I thought the Genesis was similar in looks and suspension design. Real nice cars. My friend has a 2017 G70 or G80...beautiful car.

Posted

My wife wants to keep it another 10 years. We’ll see, it’s not a Toyota or Honda after all. She sits on a cushion so the seats still look new. I’m eyeing the Stinger, G70, ES, CPOs next. I like my Camry. I never really got comfortable with front drive cars. The Camry was the end of model run and a bargain. I am surprised I like it so much. Every now and then I still like to hammer down, spinning front wheels don’t cut it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
11 hours ago, Doublebase said:

I owned a Lexus LS460 for five years, I thought the Genesis was similar in looks and suspension design. Real nice cars. My friend has a 2017 G70 or G80...beautiful car.

That's because Hyundai likes to reverse engineer stuff and rip off designs.  that's how they fixed their shitty reliability issues from the 90s and 2000s.  Come 2010, they were building some decent stuff, but with so many similarities inside and out to Toyotas, Honda's, and other brands.  My 2008 POS Santa Fe is a cross of a Nissan, Toyota, and Mitsubishi.  (the 2.7L engine is a rip off of a Mitsubishi engine)  

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Oh, and Hyundai/Kia also hired a bunch of folks from various manufacturers who were experts as well.  They knew they had trouble and they went and paid the $$$ to get some good people to help, and it is showing.  They were VERY smart there. 

  • 7 months later...
Posted

I have a 2014 Sierra with the 5.3 liter engine. It has done 150,000 km (about 90K miles) without issue. 2 weeks ago while driving on the highway it started running rough and stalled. Towed it to a local dealer, the diagnosis is the engine is done. There's a rod knock in the bottom end and a broken valve spring. When this happened I was 8 days out of warranty.

What I'd like to know is what is the cause of this failure? GM isn't any help, just ducking and weaving to avoid any responsibility. If there is a thread covering this issue and anyone can provide a link to it, or whatever other insights you may have, thanks in advance.

Posted

How often did you change the oil and filter?

What oil and filter?

Just curiuos?

There are others with motor problems.

:)

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

My 2019 new body style silverado LT 5.3  with dfm  4000 miles on,  not even had its first oil change ,  had a p300 and a p306,   #6 cylinder misfire , collapsed lifter,   they replaced 8 lifters on that bank.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...