Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, jogutier said:

I know what you mean. I'm just hoping to recoup some of that $100 from ebay with my old charging module. lol

Good luck. They are practically worthless. As another member has done, it is best used as a ugly paper weight.

Posted
14 hours ago, 2017SierraSLT said:

Good luck. They are practically worthless. As another member has done, it is best used as a ugly paper weight.

I though it was a good paper weight, I dont even think i can give this thing away for free. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Big thanks to Pgamboa for the wiring harness.  My charging unit arrived yesterday and I just installed it and it works great!

 

The only thing I would change in the harness is make it about 4 inches longer so that the white connector is in the center console and not have to stuff back under the lid.

Edited by David Ulbrich
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, David Ulbrich said:

The only thing I would change in the harness is make it about 4 inches longer so that the white connector is in the center console and not have to stuff back under the lid.

+1

Posted
Big thanks to Pgamboa for the wiring harness.  My charging unit arrived yesterday and I just installed it and it works great!
 
The only thing I would change in the harness is make it about 4 inches longer so that the white connector is in the center console and not have to stuff back under the lid.

Thansk for the feedback! If you give me an estimated length, I can update this moving forward.

This is how another member cleaned his up.

f56c00912adf2e246924351ba179f911.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Thansk for the feedback! If you give me an estimated length, I can update this moving forward.

This is how another member cleaned his up.

f56c00912adf2e246924351ba179f911.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



4 to 5 more inches will allow it in the console at the bottom of the hinge. I did what this other member did that you posted, but it was a tight fit. My vehicle is a 2017 Yukon Denali so not sure if that makes a difference or not.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

4 to 5 more inches will allow it in the console at the bottom of the hinge. I did what this other member did that you posted, but it was a tight fit. My vehicle is a 2017 Yukon Denali so not sure if that makes a difference or not.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I appreciate the feedback! I am also making these all a 4-Pin wire hanress to accommodate the Fault Indicator Control circuit (pin 4) found on Colorado and Canyons. So the feedback is much appreciated! I want to make these as cross compatible as possible, providing the most flexibility.

 

So the factory console harness end would plug into mine, below the hinge. Is that right?

 

For trucks, that ends up in the rear of the console.

Posted

Got back from a work trip and decided to tackle the pinning the connector to fit the 2018 module. Pin 1 Violet, pin 2 black and pin 3 green. @pgamboa if you could let me know if this the correct pinning order I would appreciate it and thanks for the assistance. 

84870A40-8B4E-4017-91FD-3814EFF1C853.jpeg

EB8459D0-C395-4B65-AE65-3F52B55283AA.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted
Got back from a work trip and decided to tackle the pinning the connector to fit the 2018 module. Pin 1 Violet, pin 2 black and pin 3 green. [mention=159655]pgamboa[/mention] if you could let me know if this the correct pinning order I would appreciate it and thanks for the assistance. 
84870A40-8B4E-4017-91FD-3814EFF1C853.thumb.jpeg.d0ae6a47d06bf70c1c51dd26b4144aad.jpeg
EB8459D0-C395-4B65-AE65-3F52B55283AA.thumb.jpeg.98b3035b04bab542c759f2d5e823dcaa.jpeg

That’s correct!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Could someone who has the new module (13521066) please let me know how much deeper/taller it is compared to last year's version? It looks to me like the connector slot sticks out an inch or so from the bottom. I'm looking to install into a 2017 Impala and there is some free space below the existing module but not too much. Thanks

Posted
On 12/17/2017 at 2:41 PM, pgamboa said:


Someone posted part # 13507652, but no one seemed to have a pic of it. That’s when the actual module part # 13521066 started to surface.

I don’t have a pic of 13507652. The bottom two modules here are the same.

de7cdbb06d13b181f6df0d01ab395741.jpg

b3c102b392d31b72988b8ee78b6cea9a.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hi Phil

I admire what you have done and really like the wiring harness you have made.  What is the plug type on the original (2015-2017) charging module?

  • Like 1
Posted
Hi Phil
I admire what you have done and really like the wiring harness you have made.  What is the plug type on the original (2015-2017) charging module?

Let me look that up when I’m back at my desk. I think I ordered some by accident and it was going to cost more to send it back than the cost of the connector.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Thanks Phil.  I am looking for a female end to make a single harness similar to what you have for my new 2018 charging module.  If you have one you’d like to sell me, I would be happy to buy it.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 446 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...