Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, jogutier said:

I know what you mean. I'm just hoping to recoup some of that $100 from ebay with my old charging module. lol

Good luck. They are practically worthless. As another member has done, it is best used as a ugly paper weight.

Posted
14 hours ago, 2017SierraSLT said:

Good luck. They are practically worthless. As another member has done, it is best used as a ugly paper weight.

I though it was a good paper weight, I dont even think i can give this thing away for free. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Big thanks to Pgamboa for the wiring harness.  My charging unit arrived yesterday and I just installed it and it works great!

 

The only thing I would change in the harness is make it about 4 inches longer so that the white connector is in the center console and not have to stuff back under the lid.

Edited by David Ulbrich
  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, David Ulbrich said:

The only thing I would change in the harness is make it about 4 inches longer so that the white connector is in the center console and not have to stuff back under the lid.

+1

Posted
Big thanks to Pgamboa for the wiring harness.  My charging unit arrived yesterday and I just installed it and it works great!
 
The only thing I would change in the harness is make it about 4 inches longer so that the white connector is in the center console and not have to stuff back under the lid.

Thansk for the feedback! If you give me an estimated length, I can update this moving forward.

This is how another member cleaned his up.

f56c00912adf2e246924351ba179f911.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Thansk for the feedback! If you give me an estimated length, I can update this moving forward.

This is how another member cleaned his up.

f56c00912adf2e246924351ba179f911.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



4 to 5 more inches will allow it in the console at the bottom of the hinge. I did what this other member did that you posted, but it was a tight fit. My vehicle is a 2017 Yukon Denali so not sure if that makes a difference or not.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

4 to 5 more inches will allow it in the console at the bottom of the hinge. I did what this other member did that you posted, but it was a tight fit. My vehicle is a 2017 Yukon Denali so not sure if that makes a difference or not.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I appreciate the feedback! I am also making these all a 4-Pin wire hanress to accommodate the Fault Indicator Control circuit (pin 4) found on Colorado and Canyons. So the feedback is much appreciated! I want to make these as cross compatible as possible, providing the most flexibility.

 

So the factory console harness end would plug into mine, below the hinge. Is that right?

 

For trucks, that ends up in the rear of the console.

Posted

Got back from a work trip and decided to tackle the pinning the connector to fit the 2018 module. Pin 1 Violet, pin 2 black and pin 3 green. @pgamboa if you could let me know if this the correct pinning order I would appreciate it and thanks for the assistance. 

84870A40-8B4E-4017-91FD-3814EFF1C853.jpeg

EB8459D0-C395-4B65-AE65-3F52B55283AA.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted
Got back from a work trip and decided to tackle the pinning the connector to fit the 2018 module. Pin 1 Violet, pin 2 black and pin 3 green. [mention=159655]pgamboa[/mention] if you could let me know if this the correct pinning order I would appreciate it and thanks for the assistance. 
84870A40-8B4E-4017-91FD-3814EFF1C853.thumb.jpeg.d0ae6a47d06bf70c1c51dd26b4144aad.jpeg
EB8459D0-C395-4B65-AE65-3F52B55283AA.thumb.jpeg.98b3035b04bab542c759f2d5e823dcaa.jpeg

That’s correct!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Could someone who has the new module (13521066) please let me know how much deeper/taller it is compared to last year's version? It looks to me like the connector slot sticks out an inch or so from the bottom. I'm looking to install into a 2017 Impala and there is some free space below the existing module but not too much. Thanks

Posted
On 12/17/2017 at 2:41 PM, pgamboa said:


Someone posted part # 13507652, but no one seemed to have a pic of it. That’s when the actual module part # 13521066 started to surface.

I don’t have a pic of 13507652. The bottom two modules here are the same.

de7cdbb06d13b181f6df0d01ab395741.jpg

b3c102b392d31b72988b8ee78b6cea9a.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hi Phil

I admire what you have done and really like the wiring harness you have made.  What is the plug type on the original (2015-2017) charging module?

  • Like 1
Posted
Hi Phil
I admire what you have done and really like the wiring harness you have made.  What is the plug type on the original (2015-2017) charging module?

Let me look that up when I’m back at my desk. I think I ordered some by accident and it was going to cost more to send it back than the cost of the connector.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Thanks Phil.  I am looking for a female end to make a single harness similar to what you have for my new 2018 charging module.  If you have one you’d like to sell me, I would be happy to buy it.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,959
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Matt Parker
    Newest Member
    Matt Parker
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 781 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a 2000 Silverado 1500 LS, whenever I put it into reverse and also in drive it clunks, the truck also feels sluggish when driving. Any advice/ideas ?
    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...