Jump to content

Surging '17 Z71 5.3??


VFR

Recommended Posts

Posted

Howdy all, I have come back to GM and just bought a '17 Z71 5.3. It has about 350 miles it and has a pretty obvious pulse/surge/skip thing going on under slight acceleration, my wife even noticed....

While this happens the V8 light stays lit, and it doesn't appear to be shifting , once you crowd it a bit it will downshift and clear up.

 

I called the dealer and got a very scripted "totally normal" so I asked what it was and he said "it's the ahhh V4-V8 coming and going and the transmission shifting to accommodate"

 

I don't by it. What do you guys think??

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

 

FYI

 

I've had a similar shifting issue with my 2017 (5.3L, 6-speed) since buying it new in December. It seemed to occur most frequently when applying light throttle on an incline, when switching from V4 mode to V8 mode. I live in a hilly area so this was a big annoyance. My solution was to use a Range module to turn off AFM and keep it in V8 mode all the time. This was somewhat effective, but I would occasionally still get the surging under light throttle.

 

However, I had the TSB mentioned above done last week and it solved 95% of the issue, to the point that I can run it without the Range device plugged in. Occasionally I get a slight hesitation, but nothing like before.

Posted

I called a local repair shop (with an impeccable reputation) and asked if I gave them my vin and the above TSB could they print something out for me, they were more than happy to and I plan on stopping in tomorrow to take a look. Friday I'm gonna be down near where I bought it to have my winders tinted and will stop in and ask the service about an update. On another note-I looked into the gas pedal (formally know as) and all seems good as far as free play.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

might want to put a few more miles on it first. My truck had sluggish acceleration , funny shifting until about 500 miles. Truck runs like a champ now

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Howdy all, I have come back to GM and just bought a '17 Z71 5.3. It has about 350 miles it and has a pretty obvious pulse/surge/skip thing going on under slight acceleration, my wife even noticed....

While this happens the V8 light stays lit, and it doesn't appear to be shifting , once you crowd it a bit it will downshift and clear up.

 

I called the dealer and got a very scripted "totally normal" so I asked what it was and he said "it's the ahhh V4-V8 coming and going and the transmission shifting to accommodate"

 

I don't by it. What do you guys think??

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Same trouble with my '17 GMC with about 1500 miles on it. Saw other owners with the same complaints and I'm happy to know it's not just me. Originally I thought it was the v4/v8 going on/off but it's definitely not. I've seen the service bulletin and I'll have it checked whenever I get around to the first oil change. I've been lagging on taking it in because I figured I'd have to find a way to make it happen consistently when the GM tech went along for the ride.

Posted

Same trouble with my '17 GMC with about 1500 miles on it. Saw other owners with the same complaints and I'm happy to know it's not just me. Originally I thought it was the v4/v8 going on/off but it's definitely not. I've seen the service bulletin and I'll have it checked whenever I get around to the first oil change. I've been lagging on taking it in because I figured I'd have to find a way to make it happen consistently when the GM tech went along for the ride.

My '17 Silverado has it as well, 2k miles in. Feels like it's been getting better lately, but that could just be me learning to accelerate at the rates where it's not as noticeable. Going to do the same thing and have it checked at the first oil change, just hope they don't give me any nonsense cause of my intake/exhaust. Keep us posted with how it goes at the deal, I'll do the same.

 

Bob

Posted

i just purchased a 2017 all terrain and i have this same problem i only put 405 miles on it and i noticed it when i drove off the lot now its driving me nuts gona have to contact them to try and resolve problem this sucks brand new truck and it has to be serviced allready

Posted

i just purchased a 2017 all terrain and i have this same problem i only put 405 miles on it and i noticed it when i drove off the lot now its driving me nuts gona have to contact them to try and resolve problem this sucks brand new truck and it has to be serviced allready

My wifes' car is a new 2016 Honda Accord and within a few months it had issues starting without the starter turning for 5-10 seconds. Honda couldn't re-create the problem so I took video with my phone to prove it. Even a brand new Honda can have problems and it just comes with the territory I suppose. Like SilveradoH said I think I'm just driving around the problem by pressing the pedal in ways that I know won't make it feel like it's misfiring/surging/jumping. Even my passengers have noticed so it's definitely a problem that I need to get resolved. Good luck with yours as well.

Posted

I'm not sure if mine has gotten better (can't imagine it healing itself) or Im getting used to it. I do find it unacceptable that a $46,000 auto has an issue like this. I'm gonna give it more time before going back to the dealer, maybe by then they will have seen more of them and won't be so dismissive.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

But then again, if that's all that I have to complain about I'm ok with that.

I came back to GM after having a '12 F150, loved the truck. It was the most reliable truck I've ever had-not one single trip back to the dealer..period. Before that I ordered a new '04 Z71 I replaced the heads, wheel bearing assemblies, rear calipers, u joints, wiper control module, radio, diff cover, heater control,the cab corners rusted out and the rockers were rusted. It was just 9yrs old and had ONLY 86,000 on her. I said I'd never own another GM....but this one is the quietest, smoothest, most comfortable one I've had!

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Took my truck into the dealer yesterday and the service rep told me I needed to prove the problem to the tech before they could fix it. I took the tech for a drive and couldn't make the problem happen even though it happens almost daily. He was a good tech and I know he probably deals with these type of problems on a daily basis. Just like going to the doctor and you start to magically feel better right before you head into the office! I showed him the service bulletin and he said he'd look into it. Thankfully they applied the update and hopefully the problem has been fixed. I've driven it for only a day so far but I usually would have felt the misfire/chuggle/whatever by now. I'll post again if the problem comes back.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Unless you are using a bypass filer system with a Beta of 1000 at 2 micron the commercial filters we have access to, even the very best of them, are poor at the 5 to 10 micron range the typical UOA test can 'see'. Point is there are some truly awful filters being sold A 45 micron Beta 75 filter is what Dyson used to call a screen door on a submarine. That leaves wear metals disconnected from filtration unless particulates are larger than the test can 'see' and yet captured by the filter...which is its job. If that is true then you have a major issue screaming at you.    The graph isn't mine. It belongs to GM and their study on this area. I looked up those studies and provided those SAE tech paper addresses multiple times. Machinery Lubrication displayed it and confirmed it. So if you have doubts about the study you'll have to take it up with GM Engineering. Just like you would have to take up a difference in opinion about the meaning a word with Webster or the length of on inch with the National Institute of Standards and Technology.      Most manuals have two schedules. "Normal Service" and "Severe Service". On it's face it tells you that oil in severe service is more highly stressed and doesn't "Last as Long". The item to bore in on is LAST...what does that mean?    It's the same question one asks about how long to toast bread. What are the inputs? Bread type? Wattage of the toaster? Distance from the elements? What is your preferred level of done?    So lets paint this with a broader brush. Oil is made up of the base and the additive package. The first is altered by heat and oxygen and later is sacrificial with a finite life subject to inputs toward that end. Resistance and supply.    It is the reason an OEM's OCI's are determined by 1.) the specifications of the recommended lubricant and 2.) risk management toward the bottom line. Those lubricants are also subject to cost effectiveness for the OEM.    There is a tendency for most people to believe that the OEM recommended oil rest on the top shelf and that anything other is lesser than. Truth is there are more oils on higher shelves than those on the lower shelf below the OEM's. They make that choice on COST TO THE OEM. Testing is incidental to the margin.    GM makes MONEY, the car/truck is a TOOL to leverage MONEY. Insert whatever car brand you like. Until you forking over a million plus COST not quality is the driver. Thus it is by DESIGN the recommended OCI's and oils fall well short of 'best practice protections'. Proof isn't hard to find. GM Ecotec I-4 2400 breather system and cold start PCM tuning has killed more motors and resulted in more litigation for those that used the 'recommended' practice than GM could bear. What was their response? SHORTEN THE OCI. TWICE.    I don't know how long to leave oil in an I don't know how the oil will respond to MY circumstances and because I don't and can't blanket statement or anecdotal evidence my way out of it.....I TEST and FIND the right OCI for the oil I CHOOSE. There is no shortcut but there is blind allegiance. I don't blindly trust anything.    People hear the word 'detergent' and believe that in the context of oil it means the same thing as laundry soap... Only in the most rudimentary way. It's the first additive to give up on you and they are putting less and less with each new API standard. Solvency can be used but it cost. Some unique undisclosed chemistries can be used. Valvoline R & P in example. OEM's haven't an interest in anything they see as limiting market participation. Whatever.         
    • For some unexplained reason my father wanted a salvage yard. As we were getting the family business off the ground one brother ran the salvage yard. We gathered there when rained out working on pipelines in the eighties to pull parts. Perfectly good running vehicles would come to us simply because they wouldn’t pass emissions inspection. We were able to swap parts and sell some of them. I got a clean old nova with a bad engine. I pulled a perfectly good small block out a Camaro. A father and son project with a rebuilt engine. The son couldn’t get the engine running right. The problem was the spark plugs weren’t gapped. The 90s vehicles probably widened the gap of shade tree do it yourself engine repair. My do it yourself hot rod repair stopped at the 70s. After that my trusted mechanic kept them in running shape. 
    • I have an old dental chair in my shop. Something I got for free and apparently it has more than scrap value? People collect them although mine isn't restored or anything. It's visually interesting (1930's Ritter) which is why I like it. And it IS decently comfortable if you kick back.   When a good buddy of mine saw it he said, let me guess, Atlas. It's a conversation piece? As in, you ask the questions, they do the talking?   Where do you hide the jar of teeth?   I would never.   
    • Are we talking about the same thing, though? The 7 versus 3 wear metals was from Lakespeed's 3.0-specific oil brand comparison test between AcDelco oil and Mobil ESP. The filter remains a constant so whatever excess particles the AcDelco oil is producing aren't being filtered out.   I'm assuming there's a parallel comparison to be made; IF the filter can filter down those particles, engine life increases, and your graph makes the case that a better filter (lower micron rating) can increase engine life. Introducing fewer particles AND filtering those particles with higher efficiency is the best of all worlds. Good oil, good filter.   Where we may disagree is the "baseline relative engine life". I'm more apt to believe the base engine life value is 200k+ on very average oil and filters, "bulk oil of unknown brand and white-label generic fleet-grade filter, Jiffy Lube"   Going from a 10 micron filter to a 5 micron filter should boost a base 200k to 275k in a vacuum as a single factor alone.   Here's the whatabout: How does regularly changing the oil and filter ahead of recommended schedule influence baseline engine life? Most people aren't going to science the heck out of this stuff or ask about Micron ratings, HTHS, or wear comparison tests at Jiffy Lube. Most of the Jiffy lube techs would say they need to call their tech support line to even try to get an answer.   --   Because we love anecdotes here, when I was fishing for 4.3 parts at a local yard this weekend, ALL of the 4.3 vehicles had well over 200k. I love looking at odometers of junked vehicles. How far did THIS go before landing at the crusher? The ones that still had engines weren't seized. None of them were vehicles I'd consider were Amsoil queens, in fact most of them had some kind of service cling-sticker in the corner of the windshield indicating it probably had very average maintenance services. Even the fresh parts rigs- I'm not sure taking an S/T series to 400k has much value considering the running value of those vehicles was probably somewhere around $1,000. 25+ years is a good run on time alone.   The intake manifold I salvaged had clean and bright pool areas. As expected, I found the fuel lines in the manifold rubbed through, just like mine. I'm guessing the lines on that donor truck started leaking, the truck started running rough, and its owner said that's enough I'm unwilling or can't take it out of service for several days, or spend $1000+ to repair it at a shop, it's simply time for a newer more reliable vehicle (or, more than likely, this is the 2nd, 3rd time this has happened in the truck's lifetime). While I don't count on my Blazer for reliability, the thought of giving it away for parts at certain points during my adventure, and being mentally free from its needs has has crossed my mind. I'd be losing $1500 or so, but I can only make more money; not time.
    • still $4.00 85 oct.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...