Jump to content

Rear Park Assist service?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone having issues with their Park Assist. Mine pops up about half the time telling me I need to have it serviced. Just curious if anyone has had this issue.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

If you've checked for obvious signs of damage or obstruction, this sounds like a warranty claim!

Posted

Mine came up as well, don't know if I got the truck that way as it is used. Heard some guys try cleaning them. Is this tied in with the crash collision system or just the camera? I was parking under the shed and the seats vibrate and a graphic came up on the dash.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

 

Park assist shouldnt be affected by light much since it works on sonar. Now Lane change? Yes since its a camera..shadows throw that system off a lot.

 

Does lighting have anything to do with it when it happens?

Posted

It may be a bad sensor. Front or rear. Or technically, a loose connection to a sensor. The dealership tech can determine with his OBD device.

Posted

I'm having the same issue, my front bumper was recently painted, I can't tell whether or not it was working before it got painted as the same day I got the truck, it went straight to the paint shop. I know after I got it back, I saw the icon warning on the dash with the car and the bars in front and behind for a brief second and never saw it again.

Posted

Mine was doing that. Gave the message in the video image when I put truck in reverse. Took it in, scanned it. Said it was a bad sensor - in THE FRONT BUMPER.

 

OK. Dealer ordered part, two days later took it in and 30 minutes later I was rolling again.

 

I wish I could increase the sensitivity in the rear. But the front is fine.

  • 1 year later...
Posted

I know that this is and old post but I got the same error so I took it into the shop, they have replaced the sensor and it didn’t fix it, it has been in the shop for 4 days now and they can’t seem to figure out what the issue is with it yet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...