Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I have a 15' denali with 6.2l. I have been noticing more and more when I look at it the front end really comes down

 

I want to do a 2.5 leveling kit but feel I may need to do more in the front to "level" it out.

 

6287f7ff60c82c2f9b40c1acc8a05bd2.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Add a couple inches to the front end and that should be good, unless you just want to get a straight up lift kit. I added the bilstein struts up front to my 14 on the 1.85" lift setting and I constantly debate on adding a leaf to get some of the rake back because the front is so high.

 

2014 Silverado Z71

Posted

That's how trucks sit. A 2" level in the front will have it looking good. 2.5 and up start to put a lot of stress on the ball joints.

Posted (edited)

2.5' will over level you and you will be nose high. 2 inches should be perfect.

Edited by 15HDriver
Posted

2.5' will over level you and you will be nose high. 2 inches should be perfect.

are you saying only 2.5" front?

because i want to bring the whole truck up 2.5" plus level the front... so i am thinking of doing a 1.5" rear and 2.5" front. that way i bring the front up an inch to maybe make it closer to "level" to the rear

Posted

You should read some of the other threads on leveling and lifts on this forum. There is a lot of reading, but spending the time now can save you a lot of money. If you don't want to take the time then I highly recommend you take the advice offered of getting a 2" level. (1.5 is even better, imo). Your truck will appear level, maintain its current ride qualities and is not expensive. FYI, You will need an alignment following any modification to the suspension.

Posted

are you saying only 2.5" front?

because i want to bring the whole truck up 2.5" plus level the front... so i am thinking of doing a 1.5" rear and 2.5" front. that way i bring the front up an inch to maybe make it closer to "level" to the rear

 

No. I am saying leave the rear stock and go 2 inches in the front. You wanted per your original post to level it out.

 

Quoting your original post:

 

I want to do a 2.5 leveling kit but feel I may need to do more in the front to "level" it out.

 

Posted

That's how trucks sit. A 2" level in the front will have it looking good. 2.5 and up start to put a lot of stress on the ball joints.

 

Start to? A 2 inch does the same thing (add stress) just a little less than a 2.5. Anything over stock adds stress, the higher you go the more stress is added. A 1.5 adds stress, not as much as a 2 or 2.5 but it adds stress none the less...

 

Tyler

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Start to? A 2 inch does the same thing (add stress) just a little less than a 2.5. Anything over stock adds stress, the higher you go the more stress is added. A 1.5 adds stress, not as much as a 2 or 2.5 but it adds stress none the less...

 

Tyler

Any level will add some stress, but it seems like the guys who did the 2.5 over the 2 kill ball joints much faster. You can read it in the leveling kit thread. I'm not saying it won't add extra stress, just not as much.

Posted

I just did 1.5" spacers under my front shocks yesterday (went with Motofab), very easy to do and I now only have a 1" rake instead of almost a 3" rake prior. Other than the nose riding higher I haven't really noticed any difference in the way the truck drives....Getting my alignment in a few day's.

Posted

Or we could load you up like a job site truck and you'll have 750Lbs in the bed constantly. Then hook up a trailer to it. That'll level you right on out.... Being seriously, the 4WD trucks have a better stance than the 2wd trucks. the 2 wheelers look nose low.

Posted

so then to add another factor to this boys... if i wanted to do a 2" overall lift while keeping the front level with the rear with 2" lift.. i am looking at a 4" front lift?

 

now with the denali i feel that maybe i may not want to adjust my shocks and such because then i will loose ride quality. i feel like i put myself in a crappy situation to really lift this vehicle while keeping the factory ride quality.

i want to be able to do 35' with 22's is my goal. i also want the truck to sit even

to do 35's i have seen guys going with the 2.5" lift and rubs a little. so will 35's fit with 1" rear lift?

Posted (edited)

so then to add another factor to this boys... if i wanted to do a 2" overall lift while keeping the front level with the rear with 2" lift.. i am looking at a 4" front lift?

 

now with the denali i feel that maybe i may not want to adjust my shocks and such because then i will loose ride quality. i feel like i put myself in a crappy situation to really lift this vehicle while keeping the factory ride quality.

i want to be able to do 35' with 22's is my goal. i also want the truck to sit even

to do 35's i have seen guys going with the 2.5" lift and rubs a little. so will 35's fit with 1" rear lift?

 

No. 4 in the front and two out back. Not gonna happen. You could do 2in in the front and then a 2" body lift, but 35" you might as well do a Magnetic Ride Control compliant 6" lift and be done with it. I've seen the HD trucks fit 35" with a level. but the most on a leveled 1/2 ton I've seen fit good was a 33"

Edited by 15HDriver
Posted

Sigh. I really wanted to stay away from big lift. But go big or go home I guess

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Sigh. I really wanted to stay away from big lift. But go big or go home I guess

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Could you leave the front alone - and shackle the back to level it and not lose ride quality on mag ride?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but it seems he is the only one that has backed up data to prove what he is stating. I think he is doing this more because he enjoys it and wants to get the information out to us. He's got the knowledge and access to the proper equipment and having the funds doesn't hurt.  I would love to do what he is doing and would do it if and when I hit the Powerball.  I'm not a Tribologist by any means but love to learn what I can.   I would bet there would be doubting people out there if a completely independent lab with high quality work and highly respected in the automotive industry, put out information like this.  The world can't be pleased, one just has to take the information that they are given, do more of their own research to find actual lab data to back up what they are trying to figure/find out.  Most don't bother, they just want to believe what they first see.     I don't have the minimax but my 6.2 in my 2019 Silverado with 64k miles shows excellent UOA results with 0w-20 and for my own purposes 5w-20.  Since not much of a change using 5w. I liked the data sheet information on the SS 5w-20 and figured I would give it a try.  Still the same viscosity at 100℃.   In the end we all just do what makes us happy, life is too short to get upset over trivial social media.   On a side note, I do feel GM has dropped the ball and just cares about the bottom dollar and not quality anymore.  "Like a Rock" has been long gone.  Seems "Built Ford Tough" has as well.
    • Better than stock but that's like putting lipstick on a pig
    • Hello, my 3 month old Sierra Elevation wont recognize a trailer with electric brakes? All the lights work correctly, but no power to the brakes?   This is the factory installed brake controller. If you manually push the knob, the display shows the power % but does not light up like my 2022 silverado.   I have an appointment with the dealer, but was checking to see if anyone else has seen this issue.    Thanks, 
    • Been using SS 0w-20 from new, but wanted to change to the 5w-20 because I liked the data on the data sheet, to me it seems like a little better product. But as you can see, not much difference. This is also with running a mix of 10 gallons E85 to a tank topped with 93. It isn't a flex fuel vehicle so any higher I get a CEL for running lean on both banks. Yes my mileage takes a hit. Instead of 20 mpg I normally get on trips I get 17mpg. This is also using EaO17 filter.  What is amazing is I have the AMSOIL cone filter on it since I have the GM Performance intake installed and that air filter has 44k miles on it.  I just take it out and shop vac it off once a year.  I use the upholstery tool on my shop vac.  Works well.   
    • So, lot's of googling and reading, and a trial fit found, that indeed they hit the newer fatter caliper. I did some re-testing today, and found just 3/16" worth of washers was enough for the wheel to spin freely. I added 2 more on each, and again it spun freely. Tested lock to lock with the 4 washers, about 5/16" not quite the 3/8" Im considering, but pretty close. No issues. I've been looking at the BORA .375" spacers and using extended lugnuts to get back lost thread due to the spacer. All the ET lugs I've seen are all .33" reach inside the wheel lug holes. For those that don't like spacers or think they're unsafe, I think it depends on what type of spacers you're using and making sure you get good quality hubcentric ones, and if you're using bolt on ones, regular mainenance, checking the spacer lugs. Not wanting or needing that much spread. Looking for the minimum that will let me run these rims and tires.  it does look to stick out a little, but I really want put these on. and use the stock all-terrains in the winter. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...