Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 5/2/2018 at 9:24 AM, GMCSierra99 said:

What is the PSI on the M1-212 Mobil one filter? I could not find any specs on their website? Anybody know?

 

Here is what Oreilly Auto's website had for specifications for the M1-212.

 

Burst Pressure (psi): 400 psi

Bypass Valve Pressure (psi): 18 To 22 psi

Filter Media: Cellulose/Synthetic Blend

Flow Rate (gpm): 11.2 gpm

Gasket Inside Diameter (In): 2.39 Inch

Gasket Outside Diameter (In): 2.76 Inch

Gasket Thickness (In): 0.37 Inch

Gaskets Included: Yes

Inside Diameter (In): 2.98 Inch

Removal Nut Included: No

 

I have use PF-63E's, M1-212's, Wix 57045, and Fram Ultra XG10575.

The Fram filter's bypass setting was 9-15 PSI.

 

I have also switched back and forth between 0W-20 and 5W-30. No issue with 5W-30 other than the lifters being a bit quieter and the oil pump slightly noisier (still functioned perfect at all times).

Edited by HondaHawkGT
More information to add.
  • Thanks 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Thanks for posting this info. I have debated between the 57045 and the 10255xp for a while, now that it is 10255 reg and xp, makes a little more sense.

It is a bit interesting though. They are increasing the required pressure of the valve to prevent "dirty" oil from entering, but at the same time extending the function of the filter element. For cold starts I guess it doesn't matter as the pressure is likely much higher, but to someone with very clean oil would you kind of want the bypass to have a lower rating. As well, after a little research there are some filters which have a small filter/screen on the bypass valve. It would be nice to have these oil filter valve sepcifications for other vehicles, when swapping brands of filters. I guess we mostly leave the trust in the parts supplier to provide a properly spec'd filter.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

I have a few 57045xp filters in my garage.  Anyone see a downside to continuing to use them?  

Posted
2 hours ago, Spurshot said:

I have a few 57045xp filters in my garage.  Anyone see a downside to continuing to use them?  

How many filters?   I don't see an issue running them especially if you do 3 to 5k oil changes. 

 

My take in this is the new oil system on these new engines probably was putting a higher pressure delta P across the filter and causing it to go into by-pass mode off and on so they raised the psi. 

Posted

Not sure where the confusion is?  GM has the higher spec bypass on the AC DELCO from the git go?  The aftermarket  is what GM's problem is....they say they are not up to spec.............CHEERS!

Posted (edited)
On 10/23/2018 at 9:54 AM, Spurshot said:

I have a few 57045xp filters in my garage.  Anyone see a downside to continuing to use them?  

Not the 'XP' version, but I finally discovered what the big difference is between PF63e, 57045, and 10255XP...about 0.350"-0.400", which when the k-member in directly below the filter, you lose all ability to use a oil filter cup wrench. Install is not an issue as you normally tighten by hand, but removal requires a shallow single size cup or a belt style removal tool. The 10255XP is a lot closer in height to the pf63e. The 57045 is wayyyy to tall. WIX site shows 57045 at 4.828"(measures same in actual) and the 10255XP at 4.776", which is only 0.050" which is like a flake of rust or scrapping the undercoating, it was definitely more than that. I forgot to measure the 10255XP but there was way more clearance as I tried a standard 15-74/76 cup on it and there was no issue.

IMG_20181024_192923449.jpg

Edited by COP TZR
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 10/24/2018 at 7:10 PM, COP TZR said:

Not the 'XP' version, but I finally discovered what the big difference is between PF63e, 57045, and 10255XP...about 0.350"-0.400", which when the k-member in directly below the filter, you lose all ability to use a oil filter cup wrench. Install is not an issue as you normally tighten by hand, but removal requires a shallow single size cup or a belt style removal tool. The 10255XP is a lot closer in height to the pf63e. The 57045 is wayyyy to tall. WIX site shows 57045 at 4.828"(measures same in actual) and the 10255XP at 4.776", which is only 0.050" which is like a flake of rust or scrapping the undercoating, it was definitely more than that. I forgot to measure the 10255XP but there was way more clearance as I tried a standard 15-74/76 cup on it and there was no issue.

IMG_20181024_192923449.jpg

I have been using a super large set of channel lock pliers.  So I never noticed the problem.  Looks like I have to buy some 10255xp filters.  I may be able to use the 57045 filters in my SS Camaro.

  • Like 1
Posted

So with a bypass from anywhere of 12-22 psi, does that not seem low? My truck even when warm still hovers around 40 psi at idle. Does that mean I am bypassing my filter all of the time?? Excuse my ignorance, but this simply baffles me. BTW i just checked my maintenance picture log and I used the 10255 filter just this last weekend. IMG_0398.thumb.JPG.e1e70ce9f87113fba5bd1bc9c4605771.JPG

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, chris.luurtsema said:

So with a bypass from anywhere of 12-22 psi doesn't that seem low. My truck even when warm still hovers around 40 psi at idle. Does that mean I am bypassing my filter all of the time?? Excuse my ignorance, but this simply baffles me. BTW i just checked my maintenance picture log and I used the 10255 filter just this last weekend. IMG_0398.thumb.JPG.e1e70ce9f87113fba5bd1bc9c4605771.JPG

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

No, that isn't how it works.  The by-pass pressure is the delta P across the filter media.  When that pressure is exceeded then it will go into by-pass, like when you go WOT or when the filter gets loaded up.  The main reason they went to a higher by--pass is because of the new variable oil pump and system.  The filter was going into by-pass more often at a lower setting so they raised it. 

Posted

So let me see if I am understanding this correctly. Let's just say the filter "fresh" is designed for 60 psi of continuous flow. If the filter degrades, or becomes restrictive over time and you go WOT and the oil pressure climbs the bypass is designed to open at 22 psi above the 60 psi design criteria. This reduces the chance of starving the engine of oil. Or am I still out there in left field?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 2 years later...
Posted
On 11/2/2018 at 6:10 PM, chris.luurtsema said:

So let me see if I am understanding this correctly. Let's just say the filter "fresh" is designed for 60 psi of continuous flow. If the filter degrades, or becomes restrictive over time and you go WOT and the oil pressure climbs the bypass is designed to open at 22 psi above the 60 psi design criteria. This reduces the chance of starving the engine of oil. Or am I still out there in left field?

Long time to wait for an answer. 😱 Sorry. 

 

The first of all a filter is designed for a flow rate, not a pressure. Picking from the air a WIX 51515 (PH8A). Catalog states it has a flow rate of 7-9 GPM and a bypass setting of 8-11 psi. It has a bust pressure of 290 psi. This filter fit dozens of engines including the FE series Ford Big Blocks. Those motor ran idle about 15 to 20 psi but near 70 psi at 6,000 rpm. That does not mean that at idle the 10 psi bypass is in bypass. The bypass pressure is the pressure drop OVER the filter media, NOT the systems pressure. 

 

 Differential Pressure Indicators and Switches | Pall Corporation

 

Excess flow can open the bypass. That is if the pump were trying to pump 12 gpm through this filler, something that might happen near 6,000 rpm then the bypass would open preventing oil starvation. 

 

Cold oil, like on a -20F day will open the valve. It would be like pumping cold honey through a door screen. It closes once the oil heats and thins. 

 

Percent filter blockage. Yea...that is the red line in the graph. With warm oil and average operating rpm (flow) the bypass remains closed until the filter becomes so plugged the pressure spikes. Eventually left unattended it will collapse and fail. 

 

Use the right filter bypass, the right oil viscosity  for the temperature and  and keep revs in check until it's up the temp and during normal service the bypass stays closed. 

  • Like 1
  • 8 months later...
Posted

I would think that a guy who’s really good about changing oil every 3,000 or 4,000 miles, who never allows his oil to get very dirty, would want the lower bypass pressure because doing so would get oil pumping in the engine a little sooner at start up. Now  maybe this would result in only a 2 second difference, and I’m just splitting hairs. What do you think, is my logic flawed somehow?  Or is the issue perhaps that oil needs to always be filtered as much as possible to help avoid AFM lifter problems that might be caused if a tiny microscopic piece of crud gets in an AFM lifter? I wonder.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 580 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
    • This landing is worse than most. Patchy blacktop with washouts, soft gravel/sand at bottom that washes out with every heavy rain. I tell everyone to put it in 4WD. A lot of them think they can pull out their trailer in 2WD. They end up digging a hole and then putting it in 4WD.  The lake is a pristine lake and has a lot of money on it. There are several wake boats and lot of large tritoons. The people with the money don't want it improved because they don't want more traffic.    Boat Landing 1.jfif Boat Landing 2.jfif Boat Landing 3.jfif
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...