Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 5/2/2018 at 9:24 AM, GMCSierra99 said:

What is the PSI on the M1-212 Mobil one filter? I could not find any specs on their website? Anybody know?

 

Here is what Oreilly Auto's website had for specifications for the M1-212.

 

Burst Pressure (psi): 400 psi

Bypass Valve Pressure (psi): 18 To 22 psi

Filter Media: Cellulose/Synthetic Blend

Flow Rate (gpm): 11.2 gpm

Gasket Inside Diameter (In): 2.39 Inch

Gasket Outside Diameter (In): 2.76 Inch

Gasket Thickness (In): 0.37 Inch

Gaskets Included: Yes

Inside Diameter (In): 2.98 Inch

Removal Nut Included: No

 

I have use PF-63E's, M1-212's, Wix 57045, and Fram Ultra XG10575.

The Fram filter's bypass setting was 9-15 PSI.

 

I have also switched back and forth between 0W-20 and 5W-30. No issue with 5W-30 other than the lifters being a bit quieter and the oil pump slightly noisier (still functioned perfect at all times).

Edited by HondaHawkGT
More information to add.
  • Thanks 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Thanks for posting this info. I have debated between the 57045 and the 10255xp for a while, now that it is 10255 reg and xp, makes a little more sense.

It is a bit interesting though. They are increasing the required pressure of the valve to prevent "dirty" oil from entering, but at the same time extending the function of the filter element. For cold starts I guess it doesn't matter as the pressure is likely much higher, but to someone with very clean oil would you kind of want the bypass to have a lower rating. As well, after a little research there are some filters which have a small filter/screen on the bypass valve. It would be nice to have these oil filter valve sepcifications for other vehicles, when swapping brands of filters. I guess we mostly leave the trust in the parts supplier to provide a properly spec'd filter.

  • 3 months later...
Posted

I have a few 57045xp filters in my garage.  Anyone see a downside to continuing to use them?  

Posted
2 hours ago, Spurshot said:

I have a few 57045xp filters in my garage.  Anyone see a downside to continuing to use them?  

How many filters?   I don't see an issue running them especially if you do 3 to 5k oil changes. 

 

My take in this is the new oil system on these new engines probably was putting a higher pressure delta P across the filter and causing it to go into by-pass mode off and on so they raised the psi. 

Posted

Not sure where the confusion is?  GM has the higher spec bypass on the AC DELCO from the git go?  The aftermarket  is what GM's problem is....they say they are not up to spec.............CHEERS!

Posted (edited)
On 10/23/2018 at 9:54 AM, Spurshot said:

I have a few 57045xp filters in my garage.  Anyone see a downside to continuing to use them?  

Not the 'XP' version, but I finally discovered what the big difference is between PF63e, 57045, and 10255XP...about 0.350"-0.400", which when the k-member in directly below the filter, you lose all ability to use a oil filter cup wrench. Install is not an issue as you normally tighten by hand, but removal requires a shallow single size cup or a belt style removal tool. The 10255XP is a lot closer in height to the pf63e. The 57045 is wayyyy to tall. WIX site shows 57045 at 4.828"(measures same in actual) and the 10255XP at 4.776", which is only 0.050" which is like a flake of rust or scrapping the undercoating, it was definitely more than that. I forgot to measure the 10255XP but there was way more clearance as I tried a standard 15-74/76 cup on it and there was no issue.

IMG_20181024_192923449.jpg

Edited by COP TZR
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 10/24/2018 at 7:10 PM, COP TZR said:

Not the 'XP' version, but I finally discovered what the big difference is between PF63e, 57045, and 10255XP...about 0.350"-0.400", which when the k-member in directly below the filter, you lose all ability to use a oil filter cup wrench. Install is not an issue as you normally tighten by hand, but removal requires a shallow single size cup or a belt style removal tool. The 10255XP is a lot closer in height to the pf63e. The 57045 is wayyyy to tall. WIX site shows 57045 at 4.828"(measures same in actual) and the 10255XP at 4.776", which is only 0.050" which is like a flake of rust or scrapping the undercoating, it was definitely more than that. I forgot to measure the 10255XP but there was way more clearance as I tried a standard 15-74/76 cup on it and there was no issue.

IMG_20181024_192923449.jpg

I have been using a super large set of channel lock pliers.  So I never noticed the problem.  Looks like I have to buy some 10255xp filters.  I may be able to use the 57045 filters in my SS Camaro.

  • Like 1
Posted

So with a bypass from anywhere of 12-22 psi, does that not seem low? My truck even when warm still hovers around 40 psi at idle. Does that mean I am bypassing my filter all of the time?? Excuse my ignorance, but this simply baffles me. BTW i just checked my maintenance picture log and I used the 10255 filter just this last weekend. IMG_0398.thumb.JPG.e1e70ce9f87113fba5bd1bc9c4605771.JPG

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, chris.luurtsema said:

So with a bypass from anywhere of 12-22 psi doesn't that seem low. My truck even when warm still hovers around 40 psi at idle. Does that mean I am bypassing my filter all of the time?? Excuse my ignorance, but this simply baffles me. BTW i just checked my maintenance picture log and I used the 10255 filter just this last weekend. IMG_0398.thumb.JPG.e1e70ce9f87113fba5bd1bc9c4605771.JPG

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

No, that isn't how it works.  The by-pass pressure is the delta P across the filter media.  When that pressure is exceeded then it will go into by-pass, like when you go WOT or when the filter gets loaded up.  The main reason they went to a higher by--pass is because of the new variable oil pump and system.  The filter was going into by-pass more often at a lower setting so they raised it. 

Posted

So let me see if I am understanding this correctly. Let's just say the filter "fresh" is designed for 60 psi of continuous flow. If the filter degrades, or becomes restrictive over time and you go WOT and the oil pressure climbs the bypass is designed to open at 22 psi above the 60 psi design criteria. This reduces the chance of starving the engine of oil. Or am I still out there in left field?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 2 years later...
Posted
On 11/2/2018 at 6:10 PM, chris.luurtsema said:

So let me see if I am understanding this correctly. Let's just say the filter "fresh" is designed for 60 psi of continuous flow. If the filter degrades, or becomes restrictive over time and you go WOT and the oil pressure climbs the bypass is designed to open at 22 psi above the 60 psi design criteria. This reduces the chance of starving the engine of oil. Or am I still out there in left field?

Long time to wait for an answer. 😱 Sorry. 

 

The first of all a filter is designed for a flow rate, not a pressure. Picking from the air a WIX 51515 (PH8A). Catalog states it has a flow rate of 7-9 GPM and a bypass setting of 8-11 psi. It has a bust pressure of 290 psi. This filter fit dozens of engines including the FE series Ford Big Blocks. Those motor ran idle about 15 to 20 psi but near 70 psi at 6,000 rpm. That does not mean that at idle the 10 psi bypass is in bypass. The bypass pressure is the pressure drop OVER the filter media, NOT the systems pressure. 

 

 Differential Pressure Indicators and Switches | Pall Corporation

 

Excess flow can open the bypass. That is if the pump were trying to pump 12 gpm through this filler, something that might happen near 6,000 rpm then the bypass would open preventing oil starvation. 

 

Cold oil, like on a -20F day will open the valve. It would be like pumping cold honey through a door screen. It closes once the oil heats and thins. 

 

Percent filter blockage. Yea...that is the red line in the graph. With warm oil and average operating rpm (flow) the bypass remains closed until the filter becomes so plugged the pressure spikes. Eventually left unattended it will collapse and fail. 

 

Use the right filter bypass, the right oil viscosity  for the temperature and  and keep revs in check until it's up the temp and during normal service the bypass stays closed. 

  • Like 1
  • 8 months later...
Posted

I would think that a guy who’s really good about changing oil every 3,000 or 4,000 miles, who never allows his oil to get very dirty, would want the lower bypass pressure because doing so would get oil pumping in the engine a little sooner at start up. Now  maybe this would result in only a 2 second difference, and I’m just splitting hairs. What do you think, is my logic flawed somehow?  Or is the issue perhaps that oil needs to always be filtered as much as possible to help avoid AFM lifter problems that might be caused if a tiny microscopic piece of crud gets in an AFM lifter? I wonder.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • same here , i have a 2020 first gen and the cost to repair these engines far excedes replacement
    • But Grumpy I did show several subdivisions that had homes starting in the 170K range. If you bought a Townhouse or Condo you could go cheaper. Same with a car 3000 dollars in the 70s translates to around 20K today. There are several models at that price. You actually get more for the money. In the 70s I drove a 3000$ car bought a 28K home and made 4.50 per hour. Thank goodness for overtime. Today I could buy a 170K house drive a 20K car and make 25 dollars an hour operating the same machine today. The difference the house, car, machine would be better and have AC. And I wouldn’t be taxed on overtime. And statistically your wife works too. Easing the burden. I thought we agreed to disagree. I brought receipts earlier, showing examples. I think you’re more stubborn than me. I was done with this debate. 
    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...