Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yo! Sorry I havnt been keeping up with this thread guys! Thank you everyone for the compliments!

I've done a little more to the truck but not much. I'm a college kid... so it's a budget thing.

Really wanting better suspension and really in love with icons stage 2....

1. Rhino rb 20 running boards

2. Diode dynamics sl1 headlights

3. Kc cyclone lights in the grill

That's basically it hahaha

20190217_155318.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, hendersonc047 said:

Yo! Sorry I havnt been keeping up with this thread guys! Thank you everyone for the compliments!

I've done a little more to the truck but not much. I'm a college kid... so it's a budget thing.

Really wanting better suspension and really in love with icons stage 2....

1. Rhino rb 20 running boards

2. Diode dynamics sl1 headlights

3. Kc cyclone lights in the grill

That's basically it hahaha

20190217_155318.jpg

Looking good! Man I'd love to overland my truck in the desert (Moab is on my check list). I've got a small lift (2.5" front, 1" rear) and 33's so I could get away with it, but I wouldn't say it qualifies as an overland truck until I figure out something for the bed (tent? cap?). I restored a 1997 Wrangler a few years ago, but sold it last year. That was a real trail rig and I'd love to get another one. The Sierra Denali would only see open land overlanding and no tight trails/rocks only because it's so pricey (and pretty). Def want to do another Jeep build but that'll hold off until next year.

 

Here's what I built...was bone stock to start. 3.5" lift, 35" mud terrains, quick disconnect sway bar, and the list goes on...

 

20170730_163722.thumb.jpg.39394c6e72f9b7c81e360af1fa88ca5b.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
8 minutes ago, midwestdenaliguy said:

Looking good! Man I'd love to overland my truck in the desert (Moab is on my check list). I've got a small lift (2.5" front, 1" rear) and 33's so I could get away with it, but I wouldn't say it qualifies as an overland truck until I figure out something for the bed (tent? cap?). I restored a 1997 Wrangler a few years ago, but sold it last year. That was a real trail rig and I'd love to get another one. The Sierra Denali would only see open land overlanding and no tight trails/rocks only because it's so pricey (and pretty). Def want to do another Jeep build but that'll hold off until next year.

 

Here's what I built...was bone stock to start. 3.5" lift, 35" mud terrains, quick disconnect sway bar, and the list goes on...

 

20170730_163722.thumb.jpg.39394c6e72f9b7c81e360af1fa88ca5b.jpg

Heck yea dawg! That's sweet, leitner designs has a cool rail topper if you're looking for something open

But I went topper because I go camping and like to keep all my stuff dry haha I still use a ground tent because I like driving to other places while camping. But these trucks can do a lot more than people think, i just wish the suspension wasnt un godly stiff.

Let's see the truck!

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, hendersonc047 said:

Heck yea dawg! That's sweet, leitner designs has a cool rail topper if you're looking for something open

But I went topper because I go camping and like to keep all my stuff dry haha I still use a ground tent because I like driving to other places while camping. But these trucks can do a lot more than people think, i just wish the suspension wasnt un godly stiff.

Let's see the truck!

Here's a couple pics, everything I've done to the truck is in my signature. Next projects are adding the intake cover over the manifold, installing my recently ordered catch can, and possibly doing traction bars (get wheel hop on WOT due to my tuning/upgrades). Topper makes sense to keep everything dry, I've been camping during torrential downpours and it sucks!

 

Sierra.thumb.jpg.0fa980322b02f15a392be3f2580c5e80.jpg

 

5c87d61cc477b_Sierra2.thumb.JPG.5c08a044528e3ca26d8fae22115429c5.JPG

Edited by midwestdenaliguy
  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, midwestdenaliguy said:

Here's a couple pics, everything I've done to the truck is in my signature. Next projects are adding the intake cover over the manifold, installing my recently ordered catch can, and possibly doing traction bars (get wheel hop on WOT due to my tuning/upgrades). Topper makes sense to keep everything dry, I've been camping during torrential downpours and it sucks!

 

Sierra.thumb.jpg.0fa980322b02f15a392be3f2580c5e80.jpg

 

5c87d61cc477b_Sierra2.thumb.JPG.5c08a044528e3ca26d8fae22115429c5.JPG

Dope! That thing it sweet, the 2016s are so cool looking and you're doing it right 

Posted
On 3/13/2019 at 12:57 AM, jgraves13 said:

I'm also eyeing some icon coilovers, hard to put close to $2k down on a set though


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yea I hear that....  seem to be the best bag for the buck though, especially if I'm planning on having the truck for awhile but it still makes my stomach hurt. Let me and us know if you end up getting them. Theres a thread on here about them but everyone on the thread seemed to not even know what icon was so theres that.

Posted
Yea I hear that....  seem to be the best bag for the buck though, especially if I'm planning on having the truck for awhile but it still makes my stomach hurt. Let me and us know if you end up getting them. Theres a thread on here about them but everyone on the thread seemed to not even know what icon was so theres that.


They're more well known among the Toyota crowd, they're on par with fox and king. It's all just personal preference


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted

Any updates to your builds? I'm trying to decide if I want to keep my RTT on my truck year round or on my M416 trailer. Or Sell it and get a Hardtop RTT and keep it on the truck. I'm very good at not committing to a plan when it comes to building out my truck.VjUPZ2T.jpg

Posted
Any updates to your builds? I'm trying to decide if I want to keep my RTT on my truck year round or on my M416 trailer. Or Sell it and get a Hardtop RTT and keep it on the truck. I'm very good at not committing to a plan when it comes to building out my truck.VjUPZ2T.jpg


What rack is this mounted on? Been looking into rtt and don't see many mounting options for our trucks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
16 minutes ago, jgraves13 said:

 


What rack is this mounted on? Been looking into rtt and don't see many mounting options for our trucks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Its Leitner Designs Active Cargo System... a bit spendy, I struggled with having something to mount the tent lower, like a 1/2 height rack, but ultimately need the annex. Now I need to save up for the pods for the rack for storage.

ocgryuu.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

No updates so far, still saving money..... never ends...

Also, going on vacations and stuff cuts into it. Having fun while I can!

Honestly the rack is dope, the only trouble I have with rtt's is that I cant drive anywhere after I have my camp set up but that's just me. Leitner is dope!

20190419_144129.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

In addition, I've been reading a lot about cold air intakes. I've read all the threads and stuff on here. There are two sides, one being that they make the intakes efficient enough and that the cold air intakes are bogus, the other side being that they are 100% better. Do you guys happen to have any knowledge on them? I just want to know from people who actually use them on our trucks. And also if it is worth the upgrade? Thanks guys.

Posted

They do make everything sound better. There has been tests that show slight increases. Don’t get an oiled one. Use the factory filter or an oilers one. Oh did I mention I like the throatier sound mine gave the truck. I think the biggest gain will be seen with an exhaust. They factory ones are much better now than the ones in the past. You could always just get the tube that replaces the factory one and it frees up space makes the engine compartment look better, oh and sounds better.

I think I covered the topic. Mine is a coolant MIT Kit with the non oiled drop in filter.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,736 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...