Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Jstnelson said:

I’ve thought about trying some temporary hack like that. I’m curious if there is anything inside the pipe as well though. If there is some kind of obstruction within the piping, I’d just get the pipes replaced. But if it’s just hollow pipes with mesh cutouts, I’ll seal them up. 

I'm no engineer but to me just having the open mesh would allow the exhaust pulse to change with the sound waves traveling through the pipe since it is open to the side making it quieter out the back of the pipe. 

 

I'm sure in time someone will remove and cut open to see inside. Then we will know.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Black02Silverado said:

I'm no engineer but to me just having the open mesh would allow the exhaust pulse to change with the sound waves traveling through the pipe since it is open to the side making it quieter out the back of the pipe. 

 

I'm sure in time someone will remove and cut open to see inside. Then we will know.

I agree that’s probably the case. If I do find out there’s something cased within the piping, I’ll report back. 

Posted (edited)

Just for your information:

it’s an empty pipe, which has holes to break the pipe resonances (standing acoustic waves within the pipe). The patches are for reducing the generation of further noise sources along the tail pipe. This design replaces a resonator.

 

The best way to test is covering the patches as mentioned (clamps, pieces of metal), no need to remove or cut. The result can be a booming noise at the pipe resonance frequencies. It might rather be noticed in the car than outside.

 

If you replace the muffler, you have to pay attention about the positioning of the patches. The position is related to the tailpipe’s total length, which is calculated from within the muffler (after the last perforation field) related to the standing acoustic waves within the pipe. Positions therefore are 50% and as far as I remember 75% plus one in between of the total tailpipe length (including the section inside the muffler).

 

 

Edited by Edward Nygma
  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Edward Nygma said:

Just for your information:

it’s an empty pipe, which has holes to break the pipe resonances (standing acoustic waves within the pipe). The patches are for reducing the generation of further noise sources along the tail pipe. This design replaces a resonator.

 

The best way to test is covering the patches as mentioned (clamps, pieces of metal), no need to remove or cut. The result can be a booming noise at the pipe resonance frequencies. It might rather be noticed in the car than outside.

 

If you replace the muffler, you have to pay attention about the positioning of the patches. The position is related to the tailpipe’s total length, which is calculated from within the muffler (after the last perforation field) related to the standing acoustic waves within the pipe. Positions therefore are 50% and as far as I remember 75% plus one in between of the total tailpipe length (including the section inside the muffler).

 

 

Haha, I just found that video and came back here to post it.

 

I’m going to order some exhaust sleeve clamps from Amazon. I figure I can clamp them all closed and test it out. If there’s unwanted changes I can remove some or all of them. I’ll report back. 

 

The clamps are $10 a piece so I can’t decide if I want to order 2 and make sure it works well or order all 6 lol

Posted
1 hour ago, Jstnelson said:

Haha, I just found that video and came back here to post it.

 

I’m going to order some exhaust sleeve clamps from Amazon. I figure I can clamp them all closed and test it out. If there’s unwanted changes I can remove some or all of them. I’ll report back. 

 

The clamps are $10 a piece so I can’t decide if I want to order 2 and make sure it works well or order all 6 lol

$60 to see if it makes a difference?  I think I would do the aluminum can and hose clamp thing first. :)

Posted
4 minutes ago, Black02Silverado said:

$60 to see if it makes a difference?  I think I would do the aluminum can and hose clamp thing first. :)

Well, If the $60 clamps work, they’re my permanent solution and a simple install; rather than buying hose clamps and cutting up cans just to test it lol. 

 

I ordered 6 of them from Amazon. So I’ll let everyone know how it goes. 

Posted (edited)
Quote

I’m going to order some exhaust sleeve clamps from Amazon. I figure I can clamp them all closed and test it out. If there’s unwanted changes I can remove some or all of them. I’ll report back. 

I'd be interested in the Outcome... :)
It could make a difference which holes you cover (or don't cover). Do the flute :D

Edited by Edward Nygma
Wrong quote
Posted
54 minutes ago, Edward Nygma said:

I'd be interested in the Outcome... :)
It could make a difference which holes you cover (or don't cover). Do the flute :D

Yea, my thoughts exactly. I’m going to cover them all then, if there’s unwanted drone, I’ll take 2 off and experiment covering 4 in different locations. 

 

I received the clamps yesterday and they sent me the wrong size (2.25” instead of 2.75”) so I’m expecting them Tuesday now :(

Posted

So today I performed a purely scientific experiment in a scientifically sound environment (my front yard) using nothing but industrial strength Duct Tape, from Harbor Freight no less....  Haha!  The duct tape fits over the mesh perfectly so why not?  I covered all 4 of my mesh holes...did I just type that?

 

Anyway,  the results were very surprising!  I mentioned in another thread that my Magnaflow muffler was actually quieter at idle than stock and the exhaust could really only be heard during fairly heavy acceleration.    Duct Tape fixed everything just like always.  Definitely crisper at idle with the deep tone back and I can hear the exhaust all the time now- not much louder, but it's definitely there now.  I haven't driven more than a few blocks so not sure about the highway noise- it'll probably burn the tape off before I can get to the highway anyway, lol.

 

Curious if this makes a big difference to the stock exhaust as well.  I'll be covering these up with something (ahem) better I think.  Go Science.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Limelight said:

So today I performed a purely scientific experiment in a scientifically sound environment (my front yard) using nothing but industrial strength Duct Tape, from Harbor Freight no less....  Haha!  The duct tape fits over the mesh perfectly so why not?  I covered all 4 of my mesh holes...did I just type that?

 

Anyway,  the results were very surprising!  I mentioned in another thread that my Magnaflow muffler was actually quieter at idle than stock and the exhaust could really only be heard during fairly heavy acceleration.    Duct Tape fixed everything just like always.  Definitely crisper at idle with the deep tone back and I can hear the exhaust all the time now- not much louder, but it's definitely there now.  I haven't driven more than a few blocks so not sure about the highway noise- it'll probably burn the tape off before I can get to the highway anyway, lol.

 

Curious if this makes a big difference to the stock exhaust as well.  I'll be covering these up with something (ahem) better I think.  Go Science.

 

 

Haha, nice. I contemplated doing something similar first. My clamps were delayed and arrive tomorrow but i’ll be putting them on ASAP. 

Posted
10 hours ago, Jstnelson said:

Haha, nice. I contemplated doing something similar first. My clamps were delayed and arrive tomorrow but i’ll be putting them on ASAP. 

Drove it to work this morning and it is definitely a big difference.  And the tape is still there, ha!

Posted (edited)
On 4/10/2019 at 8:24 AM, Limelight said:

Drove it to work this morning and it is definitely a big difference.  And the tape is still there, ha!

I installed my sleeve clamps last night and drove it to work this morning. It’s definitely a little louder. I can hear a little tone at idle from inside the truck now. It used to be almost silent at warm idle. I like it. Took it from about a 4 to a 5 on the loud scale. And still absolutely no cabin drone. 

 

2.75” clamps are too big for stock exhaust though. I’m going to get some exhaust patch tape and place that over the mesh and tighten the clamps back over that to get a tight fit. 

Edited by Jstnelson
  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/11/2019 at 8:43 AM, Jstnelson said:

I installed my sleeve clamps last night and drove it to work this morning. It’s definitely a little louder. I can hear a little tone at idle from inside the truck now. It used to be almost silent at warm idle. I like it. Took it from about a 4 to a 5 on the loud scale. And still absolutely no cabin drone. 

 

2.75” clamps are too big for stock exhaust though. I’m going to get some exhaust patch tape and place that over the mesh and tighten the clamps back over that to get a tight fit. 

Just an update after driving a few hundred miles; clamping the resonance free pipe is a definite sound improvement. I highly recommend a Flowmaster super 40 and clamped mesh inserts. It gives a great tone outside the truck and, while driving, you can clearly hear a good V8 exhaust tone with no drone at all and still pretty silent on the highway. There are a couple speeds that you can steadily hear an exhaust tone while cruising but it never drones/resonates within the cab. 

 

Revving the truck with stock exhaust sounded like a vacuum cleaner. 

 

Revving with Flowmaster Super 40 and stock axle-back had a good tone but sounded like someone was holding a pillow over the tips. You could convince me it was a stock exhaust if I didn’t hear a cold start. 

 

Revving with Flowmaster Super 40 with closed off mesh resonators sounds loud and mean. Definitely sounds aftermarket. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I see some red flags.   - No mention in the Carfax if the oil pump belt was changed.  LM2s had a 150,000mi service interval, and its got 164,245mi on it.  So right out the gate it needs about $3000-3500 for that to be done before driving it another 150,000mi.  Belt is at the rear of the engine.     - If something happens to the transmission valve body, the special coverage is expired by mileage.  That will likely be an out of pocket expense, with zero or near zero GM participation if something happened even though its in by time.   - 2020 LM2s seem to need timing chains after 80,000mi at some point.  They fixed this end of 2020/starting 2021 model year engines.  They will usually set a P0016 I think?  There is another $8000-10,000 if it needs a chain.  The main chain is at the back, secondary at the front so the pump belt would be done at the same time if it needed chains.     - Long oil change intervals.  7,000-8,000mi on average, probably close to 0% or perhaps to or beyond 0% on the OLM.  Lots of them not at the dealer which makes me wonder how much of the oil ran through that truck was the proper Dexos D rated 0w20 oil and not just gas engine 0w20, which is not the same at all.     - Long fuel filter changes, again likely taking the fuel filter life to 0% or more.  First one went 28,603, second was done 43,094 miles later at 71,697, from there another 46,452mi to 118,149mi, and then the most recent one 37,026mi later at 155,175mi.  So counting its original fuel filter, its had only 4 fuel filters on it.  No bueno IMO.         Good news?    - It has had only two warranty trips to the dealer.  The first free service (end of December 2020 on the Carfax), and the transmission reprogram recall (end of August 2025 on the Carfax).     - Truck did a LOT of moving, so that might explain the lack of emissions related repairs like bad NOX sensors, bad exhaust temp sensors, bad glow plugs, etc.         The "emissions system checked" could just be how something was flagged for Carfax.  GM dealers have to do SAVI reports for warranty repair orders so they scan the truck.  So its possible that is there for that?  
    • Thank you, @Z45!   NOTE - No all repair shop/Dealers reports to Carfax   That is my main concern.  The CARFAX looks way too clean for a 6 year old anything with 164,245 miles.  Even something known for reliability (like many Toyotas) typically has a lot more replaced, like a Nav screen, interior trim, shock/strut, or brake pads.  And surely the last set of tires (installed at ~58k miles) would be bald unless those were all highway miles.   I'm tempted to pay a local dealer to look up the VIN, but am not sure if that will be worthwhile.  Last time I did this, it was 100% useless, and I felt scammed - they noted the bumper was replaced years ago and that's it.  A 5-year old could spot the accident damage, even though nothing was on the CARFAX.   After giving the dealer a call, the truck may have a hard shift, but they have to verify with their mechanic if that's even a concern.  And I've test driven about a dozen of these now, many near Chicago, and half the trucks shift hard/odd at all throttle positions.  The ones with aftermarket lifts/larger tires shift terrible, and 3 stock trucks shifted so violently I thought the transmission valve body was going out.   At this point I'm conflicted, as I need a vehicle, and am coming up short locally.  Northern trucks in this price range tend to have either multiple owners, a lot of mods (lifts/oversized tires without re-gearing), and are generally in rougher shape.   If this truck showed up in your neighborhood for $27k and you had to purchase it sight-unseen, with the possibility of needing a 10L80 rebuild, torque converter, or rear end - would you do it?  I'm convinced most of the 10L80 trucks I test drove are broken, they can't all shift so bad, with massive flares/slipping/lurching and mis-matched downshifts like a teen driver learning stick.
    • From the spy shots, the front end does look like it's borrowing some styling cues from the Canyon. I'm more interested in the powertrain news than the screens though. If the 3.0 diesel survives into the next generation, that alone will keep a lot of current owners interested.  
    • What is this tuner you mentioned that can shut the system off?
    • I had it tested at the hardware store, and it showed no chip. He went out to started the truck today and it wouldnt fire. He waited an hour then tried again, and it started 3 times. In a row. My 2000 cavalier did not have a chip key, but still had a security system.  🤷‍♀️
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...