Jump to content

Automatic braking may not be working?


Jerry Lee

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, Jerry Lee said:

SS502 - let me know what the dealership says about why the brake assist is not working. I really want to know if mine are working. Like you, I’ve tested by nearly rear ending a car on purpose and nothing happened. I do get the orange car on the dash when I get close and only got the red warning when a car came across in front of me one time but I don’t think the brakes came on. But not sure; I was distracted by the beeping!  Smile. 

 

Ftwhite - maybe I can make something that looks more like the rear end of a car but would think the brakes should come on when a motorcycle or maybe even a deer is about to make contact with the front of my pickup?  Maybe my dealer has a way to test it. I will ask at my next visit in February.

Thanks guys

Will do! For what it’s worth, I will never trust this system but hopefully if needed it will someday work ?

Posted
On 12/30/2018 at 10:10 PM, Jerry Lee said:

SS502 - let me know what the dealership says about why the brake assist is not working. I really want to know if mine are working. Like you, I’ve tested by nearly rear ending a car on purpose and nothing happened. I do get the orange car on the dash when I get close and only got the red warning when a car came across in front of me one time but I don’t think the brakes came on. But not sure; I was distracted by the beeping!  Smile. 

 

Ftwhite - maybe I can make something that looks more like the rear end of a car but would think the brakes should come on when a motorcycle or maybe even a deer is about to make contact with the front of my pickup?  Maybe my dealer has a way to test it. I will ask at my next visit in February.

Thanks guys

Okay took it in today and basically told me it works as it should. They drove it behind another dealership vehicle and we were doing about 45 mph. They had the road to themselves and had those old style walki-talki things. They tested it two ways, one with the lead car stopping fairly fast and I saw the (from passengers seat) red lights on windshield and he told me the seat vibrates (took his word for it) and the warning chimes sounded. Then he did a different scenario where he accelerated and got really close and same things happened. All I can say is I must be a very cautious driver because I don’t drive the way he did. I asked why I could get within a foot of another car (when I was doing my testing) and he said it knows if you’re going about the same speed and won’t work other than turning the green car to yellow on the dash. As I said, I will never trust it to do my job but I guess if I’m caught in the situation he did it will work. I was surprised they let me go along but they did.

Posted

Thanks for the reply. Maybe mine will work if needed. I assume the brakes worked too?  I’ve approached some cars at red lights pretty close and pretty fast but nothing happens. Maybe the brakes will apply before I hit someone. I hope I never need it!

Posted
3 minutes ago, Jerry Lee said:

Thanks for the reply. Maybe mine will work if needed. I assume the brakes worked too?  I’ve approached some cars at red lights pretty close and pretty fast but nothing happens. Maybe the brakes will apply before I hit someone. I hope I never need it!

He did not wait for the brakes but by the way it felt from the passenger seat, the brakes were somehow stronger but I have no idea how aggressively he applied them. He flat told me that he was not about to wreck my truck and the other car just to see if they actually engaged but with the red lights, seat vibrating and beeps I have to assume the system is at least seeing and responding. Personally, I’m 58 and have never rear ended anyone so I’m just going to keep driving the way I always have...IF for some reason they engage and save my butt...well I’ll be happy I have that system ?

Posted

Mine triggers on side streets where you drive slightly in the area of parked cars oncoming traffic and are approaching a parked vehicle (slightly offset). Other than that it scenario the system is pretty hard to trick.  

Posted

Here is some more info, and the RPO code on my truck was UHY if people are curious:

http://gmauthority.com/blog/gm/general-motors-technology/gm-safety-technology/gm-active-safety-technology/general-motors-automatic-braking-technology/gm-front-automatic-braking-technology/

 Not sure how far you want to push testing given this statment:

"The feature may even help avoid the collision “at very low speeds”, according to GM"

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The Germans basically didn't make the list. There aren't a lot of shade-tree mechanics who work on them in general. At some point the economic equation of keeping a car alive favors junking it. Anecdote/experience tells me this is the case versus actual bad engines/engineering. Not that there isn't any, but there are definitely notable excellent examples. The 2.0 diesels will go forever and ever if one keeps the car around it running. The 2.0 gas cars eventually wear out their turbos but the block below it is usually still solid as a rock. BMW inline 6's same thing. Mercedes diesels of yesteryear, not uncommon to see 250k out of those engines, easy.     Link to the synopsis of the study: https://www.iseecars.com/longest-lasting-cars-study
    • 0w20 is recommended in the Sequoia. 0w16 in the Highlander Hybrid.   I think you make a compelling case for both the quality and frequency of maintenance but I wouldn't go so far as to plot a linear relationship between longevity and oil weight 😉   The list is interesting and leaves me with some questions. The Silverado 1500 is 12.9% likely while the GMC Sierra 1500 is only 10.8% likely. Arguably, they're the same truck, so other factors must be influencing the outcome.   The Honda Odyssey ranks #12 at 13% likely. Great. Rest assured we'll never stop hearing about the dang thing LOL.   There's a bit of a spread between the 4Runner (32.9%) and Tacoma (25.3%). Both overlap on the same 4.0 for many years although the Tacoma used a 3.5 for the last 10-12ish. I wonder if that's related to use-case or if it's suggesting the 3.5 isn't quite as up to the task, or maybe something else fails mechanically.   Ram at 3.5% overall likely, but the Ram 3500 holds the top spot on the Heavy Duty Models at 39.7%. One might say the Cummins is a ringer and provides an unfair advantage. I don't think it's fair/accurate to pit the GM Fullsize 1500's in a list with HD's which are basically medium-duty wearing a 3500 badge.   The Tahoe and Suburban hold spots #15 and #8, respectively, on the longest lasting SUV's list. What's the difference? One's got a shorter butt, unless they're also counting the 2500/3500 Suburbans in those numbers.   The GMC Canyon gets a 1.4% increase over its twin brother Colorado. Why, because it's prettier?   SO many questions...
    • Have the aftermarket system removed an re-test.  Its pretty much the only way to know if there is still an issue that is the truck and not from that.  
    • Yeah they all have break in procedures I completely ignored in the past. During tests drives I would test them out. It seems today they’re sensitive so it’s probably a good idea to follow the procedure. The other would be changing the oil more frequently in the beginning.
    • Thanks for not getting back to share your findings...  🙄
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...