Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Update to my post for 2017 tahoe. Dealership will repaint hood and roof for 1500. We have to pay 750. I am not happy about this. I have 30 days to make a decision. It has to be done. It looks like someone has taken sandpaper to the hood. We have always purchased Gm/Chevy. This has been our most expensive and worst vehicle.

Posted

I purchased a 2015 Tahoe and have the same issue with most of the damage occuring on the hood and roof.  Pattern of damage was circular and looked like someone took wire mesh to it.  The vehicle is currently in the repair shop being painted.   Local dealer has been very good to me and recommended reaching out to corporate.  Never thought they would assist so I'm paying out of pocket.  Stumbled onto this forum while looking for potential cause.

Posted

Based on comments on this thread, we know the condition spreads from 2015 to 2018, even saw a 2014 in there.  Just another one of those things that’s going on with this generation.  It's happening to my truck too.  I waxed the truck every time it was washed so there was always protection from the elements.  This is not happening anywhere else on the truck, but that’s not to say it won’t.  The inferior GM paint job combined with the sub-par paint, takes more of a hit with the sections of the truck exposed to the most sunlight.  Has to be that cause I hand wash the truck with clean water and soap then dry it with a non-abrasive drying cloth.  Never used the dealer or automated car washes.  The ONLY thing that would have “delayed” my process would have been constant garaging.

Posted

Any particular color? I have an 18 in Tungsten and haven’t noticed a problem yet. Build date was March 18. Vehicle sits outside. I do keep up on wax though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

My color is Tungsten Metallic.  Starts out looking like the hood was swiped with 100 grit sandpaper then progressively gets worse.  Wax didn't do anything for me.

Posted (edited)

How is the very front edge of your hood and the very front edge of the roof?  I would be interested to see some pictures.

I recently bought a 2019 Yukon with 34,000 miles in black, assembled in September of 2018.  The pictures provided here by some members looks a lot, lot worse, but on the front edge of my hood looks a bit worn.  Also, on the hood/roof you can see some streaks in the paint that run parallel to the length of the vehicle.

I am greatly looking forward to the spring/summer when I will be able to wax and buff the car myself.  Back in 2005, I had a 10 year old, black 1995 Jeep Cherokee that had dull paint, but I was able to bring back a pretty nice shine, and this paint on the Yukon is way better than that so I am HOPEFUL that I will be able to do some good and make it look a lot better.

Being an ex-rental, it has seen a LOT of highway miles and a LOT of automatic car washes I am sure.  Although my 2011 Nissan Altima was also an ex-rental and didn't exhibit these streaks, it was not black, so black may be the easiest color to see use and abuse than any other color.  As they say, black is one of the best looking when clean, and one of the worst looking when dirty.  No doubt about it, black shows problems and filth like no other color!

Edited by BlaineBug
Posted

I installed this to protect leading edge. Not noticeable with tungsten. Black u won’t see it.

d5522867dc54d624ee2b8f0d99be1a0b.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

How does that install?  Double sided tape?  I would be concerned about water, filth, salt, etc building up between the "brow" and the hood.  Remember those old school vinyl bras?  Often times they would wreck havoc on the paint on the edges.  Create a new problem by trying to solve another.

Posted
How does that install?  Double sided tape?  I would be concerned about water, filth, salt, etc building up between the "brow" and the hood.  Remember those old school vinyl bras?  Often times they would wreck havoc on the paint on the edges.  Create a new problem by trying to solve another.


Yeah. It’s just double sided tape. The water can still flow behind it and debris doesn’t get stuck. I would rather look at this than paint chips. Double edged sword in my opinion.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted (edited)

Funny thing, my front edge isn't chipped.  On the other hand the driver's side mirror cover has all sorts of painted touch up dots on it.  Almost an absurd amount in comparison to the passenger side mirror cover.

Edited by BlaineBug
Posted

Like I said, I look forward to warm weather when I give it a good hand wash and then use my orbital buffer to give it a nice polish.  Maybe April, May.  We'll see how this spring goes for temperature.

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I have a 2016 black Tahoe with the paint coming off on the hood and roof also.  It looks terrible.  I called the dealership and they sent me to voicemail,   I left a message and still no reply.  For how much they cost, and seeing everyone is having an issue there should be a recall on this paint.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I have a 2015 Black Tahoe LTZ. The hood and the roof are both fading. They look super scratched and faded. I’ve taken it to 2 different body shops and they both said this shouldn’t be happening. Anyone had any luck getting it fixed and it being covered by GM? The quotes were anywhere from $1k-$3500k. I hate to have to pay out of pocket considering how much this truck costs. 

Posted
On ‎1‎/‎16‎/‎2020 at 9:56 PM, BlaineBug said:

Like I said, I look forward to warm weather when I give it a good hand wash and then use my orbital buffer to give it a nice polish.  Maybe April, May.  We'll see how this spring goes for temperature.

I am looking to give this a try with my orbital DA in the spring.. I have used the Turtle Wax Seal and Shine after I compounded in the fall and love it.. Keeps the car cleaner..

 

https://www.amazon.com/Turtle-Wax-53412-Solutions-Ceramic/dp/B07XYPS3PV/ref=sr_1_2_sspa?keywords=turtle+wax&qid=1582096569&sr=8-2-spons&psc=1&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUFFRkJETkhZREZYT0wmZW5jcnlwdGVkSWQ9QTA3NjM3MDEyV09JWVFSU0VDS1NDJmVuY3J5cHRlZEFkSWQ9QTA1NTAyNDYzTTQxMDNLNE9JUVVLJndpZGdldE5hbWU9c3BfYXRmJmFjdGlvbj1jbGlja1JlZGlyZWN0JmRvTm90TG9nQ2xpY2s9dHJ1ZQ==

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,838 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...