Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Alas, It's not a FULL size SUV or Pick Up Truck.

We also own a fully loaded  Acura MDX ................ but it's not a truck.

Posted

In what universe is the LX 570 not a full size? It's definitely not in the same class as an MDX. Sure, it's not long wheelbase like the Suburban but GM and Ford are the only manufacturers that make an extended wheelbase full size SUV.

Posted

In MY universe, anything short of the mammoth size of a Ford Expedition, GMC Yukon XL, Chevy Suburban is in truth .....

less than full size. Remember when the BIG Lincoln Continental was called a full size .... now some folk call cars like the

Kia Cadenza  ... Buick LaCrosse  .... Toyota Avalon  full size ????????

 

If you want to think of the Lexus 570 as full size OK ... you just have less to carry than I do.

No fighting ... just a difference in what we consider LARGE

Posted

Now you're just playing games and this site was meant for better things ... Ciao

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I’m back.. 3900 miles now,, blue screen is back.. brought back to,dealer..they pulled codes and there was about seven codes.  They cleared all codes, I was then backing out of the service area, and the screen blue screened again.  Called  service director over, they pulled codes again, it was loaded with the same fault codes.  

Posted

I have 3,800 miles on my 2019 Sierra SLT and have not had a week without camera failures.

I either get total camera failure or back p camera failure.

The dealer, GMC Riverhead NY has done 6 software"upgrades" and nothing helps.

I drive out of the service center and either right away or within 5 cold starts it happens again.

 

This is totally unacceptable.

Has any one found a reliable cure that works ALL the time?

My dealer tells me I'm the only one they know of with this problem and that GMC tech line has never heard of the problem .... I call BS

 

Anyone who has a found cure ... PLEASE POST IT

 

Posted

 
Anyone who has a found cure ... PLEASE POST IT
 


My dealer fixed my issue by replacing one of my cameras. It was the passenger mirror assembly.

Hasn’t had an issue since.
Posted

Thanks ... I've been asking my dealer ti repace the entire set of cameras nut he's been wasting his time and mine on software. I called him again last eeek and asked him to get an OK from GM ti change all of the cameras

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 1/4/2020 at 12:46 PM, Yoda2 said:

I have 3,800 miles on my 2019 Sierra SLT and have not had a week without camera failures.

I either get total camera failure or back p camera failure.

The dealer, GMC Riverhead NY has done 6 software"upgrades" and nothing helps.

I drive out of the service center and either right away or within 5 cold starts it happens again.

 

This is totally unacceptable.

Has any one found a reliable cure that works ALL the time?

My dealer tells me I'm the only one they know of with this problem and that GMC tech line has never heard of the problem .... I call BS

 

Anyone who has a found cure ... PLEASE POST IT

 

I’m having the same problem.  Opened case with Gm, Gm engineer engaged waiting for appt.  I have already told them i(gM) that they are not using my truck as a Genea pig and rip my truck apart to find  the problem, the truck has a gremlin, if they cannot isolate and guarantee fix, I want out,  I’m done, 67k on a truck and my wife won’t drive without cameras, that’s why I bought this,  Totally disgusted.. 4200 miles, been to dealer 5x, radio modusl replaced, software upgrades multiple times, errors are extensive.. I’ll keep you posted 

Edited by jbshoo
Posted
10 hours ago, jbshoo said:

I’m having the same problem.  Opened case with Gm, Gm engineer engaged waiting for appt.  I have already told them i(gM) that they are not using my truck as a Genea pig and rip my truck apart to find  the problem, the truck has a gremlin, if they cannot isolate and guarantee fix, I want out,  I’m done, 67k on a truck and my wife won’t drive without cameras, that’s why I bought this,  Totally disgusted.. 4200 miles, been to dealer 5x, radio modusl replaced, software upgrades multiple times, errors are extensive.. I’ll keep you posted 

Thanks, I appreciate your response.

My servicing dealer has spoken with GMC many times.

They just gave the dealer a list of items and tests to do and things to change.

I'm now waiting until they have a loaner for me as the list is extensive and with other recalls on tap as well, they need the truck for a few days.

I'll keep you posted as well

 

Steve

Posted (edited)

I just stumbled into this thread. Guys, I had the same issue for a while: intermittent blue screen/service rear camera message. Some days it would happen, some days it wouldn't.

 

This past summer I opened up the tailgate to install the kicker audio for the multipro tailgate. In so doing, I discovered what looked like an A/V cable loosely connected to a port inside the tailgate. It had a lot of slop to the connection. I secured the connection with electrical tape and have not had one blue screen since. Maybe I'm telling you something you've already tried/tested, but if not it might be worth your time to drop the tailgate, get out some torx bits and check the connection inside the tailgate. I was following this chap's directions: 

Not sure if its the same access in the Silverados or not, but I gotta believe the interior electrical connections are the same. 

 

 

Edited by Shawn O'Leary
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Hey.  I've been so busy I haven't had time to get this addressed.  Has everyone pretty much gotten the Blue screen service rear vision system fixed now?  I was just searching this and noticed a tech bulletin specific to this issue and am hopeful this may be the fix...   Bulletin No.: 19-NA-076   Is anyone familiar with this?  Last time I rattled my dealer was back in early November on this.  I'm hoping this new information came out after and the fix in now in.  Hoping...  I was thinking software issue and was disappointed in the latest 807 update it still continues for me every day.  Maybe this is it.  Just looking to see if anyone having this issue has had it resolved now and can point to anything of note if not this bulletin.  Thanks.

 

MC-10169266-9999.pdf

Edited by Steve Martin
additional
Posted (edited)

Steve,

Thanks for your post about the service bulletin.

My local servicing GMC dealer had my Sierra for about a week.

This was the 8th time it was in for the blue screen " service rear camera".

In previous services they had reprogrammed the computer multiple times and done at least 6 updates with No Joy.

I would drive out and within 2 or 3 start cycles it would be back, but not always present.

This last time they claim to have changed a module behind the rear seat.

So far, one week later, no blue screen.

I hope this is it.

 

Edited by Yoda2
typo
Posted

Just pulled off my tailgate cover to check my wiring, it's funny, I thought it was so cool that they included these covers now so I don't gotta buy one to protect the metal but after removing it..... I realized it's there because there's almost nothing underneath lmao, just some cross braces, otherwise it's all hollow. Anyways, found a couple wires were pinched but nothing loose, I adjust the wires and then went under the truck. All my wires under the bed from the tailgate were just dangling and the clips were pulled out, I'm guessing the lazy people that did the spray in bed liner before I purchased the truck couldn't be bothered. Had to drop the spare tire to reach them and got it all tidied back up and in place. 

 

None of this made any difference. Did a test drive and the camera still flickers when I push on the brake pedal, which means it's also still going to give me the random service camera error. Note that I have the cheap camera and cheap radio, dunno if they can even update these things like yall can the HD stuff. At least the glue I applied to my mirror cap while I was out there seems to be holding, hasn't popped back out yet haha. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...