Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Cpl_Punishment said:

If I remember correctly, windows down is more efficient below 55 mph and A/C is more efficient above 55 mph. Thinking back now, I can't decide if their test method was flawed or not, as they ran the A/C full blast, requiring the driver to wear a parka.

I do recall the test was on a nascar track or asphalt oval if memory serves me correctly.

  • Like 1
Posted

Draft Semi’s on the highway. 20-40% increase in mpg.

 

Gasoline is E15 now. Googling says, a 1.5% mpg loss..or 0.3mpg loss. We all have to see if it is true  over the next few months.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • 3 years later...
Posted
On 5/30/2019 at 11:56 AM, Grinnen said:

Nobody ever understands what Octane does. 

The higher the octane the higher the ignition temperature. Some vehicles, mainly older ones, require a higher octane due to pre-ignition because of how engine heat is concentrated in areas, or to stop it from igniting in the cylinder (again, because of heat) before the spark sets it off. That's it, that's all. Nothing magic about a higher octane unless you've changed your engine/ignition system in a significant way that makes it require a higher octane.

Proper truck geometry will net the highest gains. When they are tested in the wind tunnel and configured for aerodynamics they are flat, as in no tires and held on a lift/table. When they are sold they have that rake added because of the suspension which is meant to carry heavy loads in the rear. Just installing a level kit added almost 1km/liter to my mileage. I've been tracking it for a long time via fill ups, the trucks trip recordings and calculations.

I went from 12.4L/100km to 11.6L/100km  (22-23MPG to 25-26MPG). You can call me out on this if you desire, but I don't care. I'm passing along my experience.

- A tonneau cover will help mileage on the factory suspension because it covers the open bed which destroys any aerodynamics when the trucks ass is in the air. When level it doesn't do a lot.

- Alignment : if they aren't tracking properly this can really affect mileage


- Tires : Not a larger tire but more the tread pattern will affect MPG. I went on my older vehicle (AMC Eagle with full Jeep drivetrain swap) from a street tire to a luggy as hell AT tire and lost about 1/5 of my mileage. But meh.


- Accessories : Ever see those ugly ass fender flares that some places sell that stick out 3-4" to cover the tire? Morons with huge spoilers on their Cavaliers and Sunfires that only work if you're capable of 170 miles an hour? Yeah..may as well add a parachute to the rear.


- Lift kits : they can affect mileage but only because of the larger disproportionate tires needing more horsies to turn and causing a bit of wind resistance. The lift in itself leaves vehicle geometry the same. However if the vehicle was designed to squat at higher speeds a lift kit will ruin it...but that's not what a pickup was designed for. 

- Vehicles learn how a person drives and over time will adapt to this for the best MPG. If you swap drivers this can affect it initially but over time it will adapt.


In the end your driving a 5000 pound 6' tall brick, with great capability and usefulness. You'll never achieve amazing mileage
 

 

Posted

try running 91 octane and drop the tailgate, inflate tires 40 psi. and drive using the MPG gragh display while using v4 as much as possible,  if you can find premium fuel with 0 ethanol than this gives amaizing results, i got over 560 miles on a full tank[22 gal] doing this

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
    • Lets see if I can sum up two pages of nothing useful.    You want to refute your own governments data of the "Purchasing Power" Index FOR THE ENTIRE USA and its territories replacing it with the experience of a single family and its business and label that reality?  Then pound on that for a week hoping it will find traction?    Stan, I've told you several times. I don't do irrational. There are more people in the USA than your family.    I'm pretty sure this tread is so blown up. I'll give you a few days or months if need be to post yourself silent then I'll see if I can find enough parts of the train to reassemble it. 
    • Facebook groups hate VSE, poor customer service; their responses to criticisms are pretty poor for a reputable company. I'm not a customer, haven't bought anything from them, but how they handle themselves on social media is a definite "No" for me. 
    • $10,000 for a transmission?   Pretty sure I could buy all the parts, tools, and education to rebuild it myself for a quarter of that amount.   or swap it out with a new one...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...