Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 hours ago, josephearljones said:

Of course. Right after I install the motofab 1.5

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
 

haha, yeah I have the 1" Motofab, but figured it would be temporary until I see what they officially come out with for a level kit for the TB.  I am sure Ready lift will release theirs soon as well.

Posted

Whole different leveling setup than the standard lower key that many have tried using on the AT4 and Trail Boss.

Which was my point in another thread where a member was having issues.

There was a reason after all that this style of leveling kit took so long to be introduced.

Proper research and development is the key to engineering success :thumbs:

Posted (edited)

I’m curious to know what the difference is with the AT4 Kit vs Trailboss Kit. Anyone have an idea?

Edited by cal19
  • Like 1
Posted
45 minutes ago, Sierra Dan said:

Whole different leveling setup than the standard lower key that many have tried using on the AT4 and Trail Boss.

Which was my point in another thread where a member was having issues.

There was a reason after all that this style of leveling kit took so long to be introduced.

Proper research and development is the key to engineering success :thumbs:

yep, I agree, although I did put a 1" motofab (motofab recommended lift) as a temporary fix for bigger tires until the proper lift came out.  definitely a lot different lift than the standard lower strut spacer.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Trailboss75 said:

yep, I agree, although I did put a 1" motofab (motofab recommended lift) as a temporary fix for bigger tires until the proper lift came out.  definitely a lot different lift than the standard lower strut spacer.

Problem was with the guys who were installing the 2" lift key on their Trail Bosses /AT4s

This Rough Country kit is definitely not that!  LOL

Posted
2 hours ago, josephearljones said:

What exactly is the RC kit? How does it differ from the puck style?


Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
 

I'm curious as well!

Posted

Just read the instructions...  Looks like RC is using a spacer in the strut spring and another under the lower mounts.  so essentially 1" up top and 1" below....   I don't see the significance in this over 1.5 / 2" spacer below the strut... 

 

Plenty of installs with the standard level kits being used since the AT4 came out and yet to see any poor reports.  If it turns out later there are issues w upper ball joint angles, then newer upper control arms can be added.  ( I did this on my 2013 2500 a few years ago. ) 

 

So far it seems that the standard levels kits work,...  But no feedback and I suspect we wont get any...

 

Posted

My dealership has a couple of AT4s on the lot that are leveled.  I called and asked about a dealer installed front level and voiding my warranty.  The dealer wants $875 to install the level / alignment, and says it will remain under full factory warranty.  The part number they game me is Pro Comp 63235.  Pro Comp's website says this part is not for the AT4.  Any thoughts?  I have not raised this to my dealership yet, as I am working for a couple more weeks before I will be home to install anyway.

Posted
23 minutes ago, thsoccer3 said:

My dealership has a couple of AT4s on the lot that are leveled.  I called and asked about a dealer installed front level and voiding my warranty.  The dealer wants $875 to install the level / alignment, and says it will remain under full factory warranty.  The part number they game me is Pro Comp 63235.  Pro Comp's website says this part is not for the AT4.  Any thoughts?  I have not raised this to my dealership yet, as I am working for a couple more weeks before I will be home to install anyway.

If you are mechanically inclined and have a jack stand and floor jack you can do this yourself and save $$... or buy the parts and have a local shop do it...for less than dealer... its an 1 to 1.5 hrs of work then alignment...  

Most of the level kits being installed are " not for the AT4" but they work as is shown by the number of members doing installs.. 

I'd be curious the dealers response to the pro comp not being AT4 compatible... but as mentioned they work...

In order to void a warranty it has to be proved that it caused a failure...    I'm running the readylift 2" level kit and 3" blocks rear... 

Good luck

 

Posted

I installed Motofab's 2" level myself on my 2017.  I am very mechanically inclined and had no issues during the install.  Loud popping noises started while turning after about 1,000 miles.  I also had both lower control arms come loose (bolts not even hand tight) twice.  The control arm bolts were not touched during the install.  The dealership and two local accessory shops chased the popping noise for 30,000+ miles until I traded the truck. They continued to tell me everything was correct, and they could not locate the source of the noise. 

 

I am paying the dealership if I level my AT4, and it will be under factory warranty this time.  

 

With that being said, I have personally put eyes on three AT4s currently on the lot with dealer installed level kits.  I guess this is the option for me, but my main question was about the kit they are using not being rated for the AT4 by the manufacturer.  I think you have cleared it up for me.  

Posted

Here is my research:

1). Dealer installed Pro Comp 63235 for $875.  Dealer says they will stand by factory warranty if they do the work, but Pro Comp says this kit is not rated for the AT4. 

 

2). Local accessory shop installed Rough Country Sku: 1318 for $350.  If the dealer were to void warranty because of this mod, RC's website fine print says the owner is responsible for having a dealership fix the truck, and then contacting Rough Country to prove the malfunction was caused by the lift kit.  This raises caution and sounds like the beginning of a "blame-game" or "run-around" to me. 

My end goal is to level the front and go with 295/65/20 (35.1") or 295/60/20 (33.9") Nitto Ridge Grapplers, but my concerns are warranty and sacrificing ride quality. 

 

Any thoughts? 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I certainly could be wrong but I hear of pickups far newer than that 2007 cutoff which may not be going to the wrecker but are having engine work done and be that a reman engine or new engine or trying to repair the existing engine. Some of it would be design issues as per the cylinder deactivation system that GM has and one of those lifters wiping out the cam and the question of oil changes moving the needle or not on that whole mess, or in the case of Ford pickup engines that have the long timing chains and wearing them out and the roller followers and phasers and some of that certainly goes back to oil change intervals. But in those various cases the truck has all sorts of life left in it and so the unfortunate owner and may be original owner or used market owner that is pouring money into repairs so the truck is not seeing the salvage yard yet but damage is happening by infrequent oil changes. A friends son had bought a 2018 I think it is half ton GM and it had some sort of extended or used dealer warranty on it and of course the lifter issue bites and its rattling and so the dealer had to swallow the bill and was at least 7000.00 and I think they only replaced what they felt they had to replace so yeah, I can see that being a ticking time bomb in the not too distant future. Would frequent oil changes cure all these engineering "marvels", probably not but some engine designs have shown that they do much better if the oil is changed a lot more often then if the manufacturer service claims are followed. New trucks cost so much that there is an incentive to keep the existing truck on the road by repairing. 
    • get a good code reader, and find out what problems the truck has noticed by reading codes. cheap ones can only get basic engine codes, you may want to get one that can get codes from all the computers in your truck.
    • This is sort of my point, salvage yards aren't overflowing with all these 'poorly' maintained trucks - excellent/good/servicable condition otherwise, salvaged only as a result of a bad engine from poor oil change regiment.    In my area, there are no 2007 to newer gm trucks/suvs in any salvage yards. A few are in the 'recyclers' with very obvious reasons for being there - wrecked.
    • Stabilitrack was a stability control, traction control system, that functioned independently from the transfer case.   Z-71 has nothing to do with the transfer case or differential.   If it does have an AWD system, my memory recalls this being specific to the Denali trim, converting won't be as simple as swapping out mechanical parts like differentials and transfer cases. It will require reprogramming at a minimum. Long story short, not likely worth it.   Pulling a fuse, may disable the AWD system, it might also prevent any other transfer case functions.   However, the AWD case was generally based on the same transfer case you refer to in the 2006 Suburban. If it still has a 4-High and 4-Low where the transfer case locks and splits power 50-50 front to rear, what are you gaining by changing anything? A true-rear wheel drive only, what good will that serve? Not enough to go through the trouble of changing out all the parts.    Generally, all the factory systems will handle a 33" tire and re-gearing. Probably a 35" tire too, if you aren't driving like a caveman. If 35" tires are in the plan...   If you do plan on driving like a caveman or are fully committed to 35" tires, an entire re-think of the build is probably in order. Starting with square one, an IFS front end isn't going to be the best starting point for 35's and caveman driving. 
    • 1/2 qt over full ain`t gonna hurt $h!t. Most times, a whole qt won`t either. Most have windage trays now. As long as the crank isn`t slapping itself in the oil, it`s not the end of the world.   We used to overfill 1 qt at the track, at race time. Better to have it over full than having the pan sucked dry at 6500 rpm`s.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...