Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Wow.  P20EE.... the same code that troubled many of us 2017-2018 model year owners with the duramax.  Took a year to get a fix.  In the meantime, my CEL came on probably 20 times.  Nice to see it comes back up in the new model.

Posted

I have a 2020 2500 Duramax a Silverado. Check engine light came on at 500 miles had Chevy reset and Regen comes on every 150 miles been in 9 times field engineer sent fix to government for approval

Posted
16 hours ago, Girthyhawg said:

2020 HD light just came in tonight 1900mi... will update after dealer visit.

Just left dealer...

p20EE bulletin #pip5664a

reset nox1 sensor and performed box deduct any test.

 

asked dealer if it happens again, I hear some ppl have issue every 150mi... he said it won’t, so I’m wondering if that bulletin was the software fix?

Posted

SES light on 4 times since order. 2500 DMax Denali. Going back in on 9/30. The light comes on after a prolonged highway ride then disappears. P20EE, emissions. Correct, no remote start when it’s on and it’s pissing me off. Picked up with the 35 mile run-in and now have 1600 miles. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Shawn T said:

SES light on 4 times since order. 2500 DMax Denali. Going back in on 9/30. The light comes on after a prolonged highway ride then disappears. P20EE, emissions. Correct, no remote start when it’s on and it’s pissing me off. Picked up with the 35 mile run-in and now have 1600 miles. 

 

AE290E84-D355-4868-832B-F3CC17D4044D.png

Posted (edited)

Check engine light came on yesterday at 6091 miles.  Going to take it in tomorrow to see what the deal is.  Was towing 200 miles from home so that was fun driving home hoping nothing major was wrong.

 

Edit: OnStar was finally able to get the diagnostics to work and it's the P20ee code.

Edited by Irish80
Posted

Had the check engine light come on, on my 2020 z71 dmax and also remote start didn't work as well. I have 800 miles on it. I took it into the dealer and i will hear back and update as well. The remote start doesnt work anytime the check engine light comes on, that is a feature as another user said. 

Posted

I was on a 1600 mile one way trip today and got the same check engine light...I was at 1650 on the odometer when it came on...OnStar ran diagnostics and told me to service at my convenience...it’s 20° where I’m at and would like to remote start...won’t be home until the 16th...I did get 20.5mpg over the 1630 miles...way better than my 19 power stroke 

Posted

Picked mine up from the dealer last night P20EE emissions code 2nd visit.  The first time they just reset it, this time loaded new software for the NOx sensor so I will cross my fingers and wait.  BTW the code only comes in on long highway trips. It usually resets (SES light) on its own a few days after city driving.  Which is nice because you get your remote start back.

Posted

p20ee came on today on trip - stopped at dealer and they put new fix in - were also doing their trucks on lot 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

'Remote start disabled' if there is an active CEL was a 'feature' on earlier generations as well. 

 

Dealer not filling the def tank at delivery has also been an ongoing problem, for as long as we've had def.

 

 

For many, this means and early and unexpected warning to add def -- and an assumption that it was because of high consumption rate. 

 

Just like fuel tank level, the def tank is NOT filled at the factory.  For trucks purchased after sitting on a lot this is probably a good thing.

 

 

Posted
38 minutes ago, redwngr said:

'Remote start disabled' if there is an active CEL was a 'feature' on earlier generations as well. 

 

Dealer not filling the def tank at delivery has also been an ongoing problem, for as long as we've had def.

 

 

For many, this means and early and unexpected warning to add def -- and an assumption that it was because of high consumption rate. 

 

Just like fuel tank level, the def tank is NOT filled at the factory.  For trucks purchased after sitting on a lot this is probably a good thing.

 

 

not checking DEF level is like not checking fuel gauge when picking up new at dealer. Its your fault. CEL has stayed off since fix at dealer last thursday. P20EE fix finally has worked.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...