Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, doozer78 said:


 

So i got same kit as you. Did u have to do any trimming for 37s? I ordered 22x10 wheels -19 offset. Just not sure to go with 35x12.5×22 or 37x12.5x22 I dont wanna deal with major trimming issues

Sent from my SM-A705U using Tapatalk
 

On mine, the bumper side of the felt fender liners on each side were cut off from the bottom up a few inches, But that’s really it.  With such a big offset that comes with a -19 wheel, I don’t know what other rubbing issues you might have, but I’d guess there will be some with 37’s......unless someone else here has done it.  
 

I know that a 37 on a +18 or +20 offset, the trimming is essentially the same as mine on factory wheels.  I’ve seen it up close and driven one with that setup and my lift.  

Edited by 2011Chevy
  • Like 1
Posted
The front end height is achieved with new keys that are indexed differently than the factory keys, but doing that alone will give you a stiff ride.  That’s why the lift includes new upper control arms-to allow for appropriate travel between the bottom of the arm and the metal frame stop.  It also includes front differential drop spacers, which eliminates the bound up feel that these have when you just crank the keys up.  Those things, along with the shock spacers, will keep the ride nice.  I drove a truck for a day with this same setup on factory rancho shocks and I can say that my upgrading to bilstein 5100’s was well worth it.  There is a noticeable difference in ride quality.

 

The rear block, to me, was essential, because these new trucks have a lot less rake than in years prior, so you aren’t raising the front much before you are slightly higher than the rear.  I would not want more than the 1.5” block in the rear for me personally.  I’m not a tall guy and this truck sits up high by most anyone’s standards like this.  

 

35’s with this setup on factory wheels will certainly work, and if 35’s is all you want, I’d leave the rear block out.  I have a close friend who has nothing in the rear with 35’s on factory 20’s.  It looks good, looks proportionate to the front just being slightly higher than stock.  But it does not have the stance that my truck has, not even close.  You could mistake his for being totally stock if you didn’t know better.  

What do you think makes his stance so different than yours? Just the fact he left the blocks out or is it the tire size? I'm so torn between 35s and 37s or does he have a different kit altogether?

 

Sent from my SM-A705U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Posted

His kit is nothing more than new keys and front shocks spacers, quite different than my set up.  
 

The stance on my truck is so different because of both the rear block and taller tires, but keep in mind that my front end is also considerably higher than his-I’m able to go higher because of the fact that I have aftermarket upper control arms.  He has adjustment left in his torsion bars to go up higher, but if he does, he’ll be higher in front than rear AND his truck will ride horribly because his factory upper control arms are touching (or close to) the frame stop.  
 

To me there is no downside to 37’s (unless touching frame at full lock bothers you).  I’ve driven both set ups and there is not a enough of a difference in power loss from 35 to 37 for me to even consider 35’s.....both trucks have all terrain type tires-35in toyo AT and my 37in nitto ridge grappler.  

Posted
His kit is nothing more than new keys and front shocks spacers, quite different than my set up.  
 
The stance on my truck is so different because of both the rear block and taller tires, but keep in mind that my front end is also considerably higher than his-I’m able to go higher because of the fact that I have aftermarket upper control arms.  He has adjustment left in his torsion bars to go up higher, but if he does, he’ll be higher in front than rear AND his truck will ride horribly because his factory upper control arms are touching (or close to) the frame stop.  
 
To me there is no downside to 37’s (unless touching frame at full lock bothers you).  I’ve driven both set ups and there is not a enough of a difference in power loss from 35 to 37 for me to even consider 35’s.....both trucks have all terrain type tires-35in toyo AT and my 37in nitto ridge grappler.  
I have same kit u got the superlift one just deciding on tires. Just scared with the-19 offset I may have some extra trimming

Sent from my SM-A705U using Tapatalk

Posted

I understand, and agree with that concern.  Looking at mine on factory offset, my best guess would be that you will trim (or loose) the factory plastic mud flap at the cab side of wheel well, Along with likely bumper and/or plastic valence trimming on the front of wheel opening. A 37 on a -19 offset really puts the tires outside the body.  
 

I don’t remember seeing a 37 on that large a negative offset without 5in of lift or more, but there are a few out there with level only on 35’s and a negative 19...looks like minor trimming, with one saying he removed the plastic mud flap...

 

https://www.customwheeloffset.com/wheel-offset-gallery/913000/2020-chevrolet-silverado-2500-hd-fuel-triton-d609-rough-country-leveling-kit

 

https://www.customwheeloffset.com/wheel-offset-gallery/1147608/2020-chevrolet-silverado-2500-hd-hostile-gauntlet-rough-country-leveling-kit

 

https://www.customwheeloffset.com/wheel-offset-gallery/984682/2020-chevrolet-silverado-2500-hd-hostile-alpha-2-inch-level-stock

 

Posted

Just wanted to chime in really quick to add some data points for ya to help with your decision

 

I have 22x10, -19 offset with a wide 35 (325/50R22 ridge grappler), it’s basically a 35x13.

 

I have the 3/2 leveling kit (3” keys with 2” block), the stance is great but I had to trim the tire side of the mid flap as well as some of the liner. The trimming is fairly minimal and looks good and clean

 

Zero rub as long as I don’t hit a bump at full lock.

 

So with a 37, depending on tire width, you’d have some more trimming to do.

 

I’m actually about to drop the front about an inch and putting on a 1” rear block instead. For me the 3/2 kit is a perfect stance, but I’m a little nose high on my fifth wheel which is the sole reason I’m dropping it an inch, sadly

 

4df04f7348b239d0a980ed0607eeec4b.plist

Posted
3 hours ago, FirstAscent said:

Just wanted to chime in really quick to add some data points for ya to help with your decision

 

I have 22x10, -19 offset with a wide 35 (325/50R22 ridge grappler), it’s basically a 35x13.

 

I have the 3/2 leveling kit (3” keys with 2” block), the stance is great but I had to trim the tire side of the mid flap as well as some of the liner. The trimming is fairly minimal and looks good and clean

 

Zero rub as long as I don’t hit a bump at full lock.

 

So with a 37, depending on tire width, you’d have some more trimming to do.

 

I’m actually about to drop the front about an inch and putting on a 1” rear block instead. For me the 3/2 kit is a perfect stance, but I’m a little nose high on my fifth wheel which is the sole reason I’m dropping it an inch, sadly

 

4df04f7348b239d0a980ed0607eeec4b.plist

I love my new AT4, but damn, your truck makes me wish I went with a Silverado High Country

  • Like 1
Posted
Just wanted to chime in really quick to add some data points for ya to help with your decision
 
I have 22x10, -19 offset with a wide 35 (325/50R22 ridge grappler), it’s basically a 35x13.
 
I have the 3/2 leveling kit (3” keys with 2” block), the stance is great but I had to trim the tire side of the mid flap as well as some of the liner. The trimming is fairly minimal and looks good and clean
 
Zero rub as long as I don’t hit a bump at full lock.
 
So with a 37, depending on tire width, you’d have some more trimming to do.
 
I’m actually about to drop the front about an inch and putting on a 1” rear block instead. For me the 3/2 kit is a perfect stance, but I’m a little nose high on my fifth wheel which is the sole reason I’m dropping it an inch, sadly
 
4df04f7348b239d0a980ed0607eeec4b.plist
Man looks great. I have my lift, basically same as yours but also has new ucas have the wheels 22x10 -19 offset also just debating on 35s or 37s really want 37s but i dont wanna have to do major trimming

Sent from my SM-A705U using Tapatalk

Posted
I love my new AT4, but damn, your truck makes me wish I went with a Silverado High Country

I love the high country grill, completes the truck!
Man looks great. I have my lift, basically same as yours but also has new ucas have the wheels 22x10 -19 offset also just debating on 35s or 37s really want 37s but i dont wanna have to do major trimming

Sent from my SM-A705U using Tapatalk


Thanks! Here are two photos of the front and rear of the wheel well which shows the amount of trimming I had to do. So you would need to do a little more.

You can see where I trimmed part of the mud flap, I bet you’d need to trim some of the liner as well.
Also depends on the width of the 37.
f4acf5f1ec11f0480d07e286de15b0a1.jpg78e604d91b1811b99b8f3f3c8a7c106e.jpg
Posted

Thanks! Here are two photos of the front and rear of the wheel well which shows the amount of trimming I had to do. So you would need to do a little more.

You can see where I trimmed part of the mud flap, I bet you’d need to trim some of the liner as well.
Also depends on the width of the 37.
f4acf5f1ec11f0480d07e286de15b0a1.jpg78e604d91b1811b99b8f3f3c8a7c106e.jpg
I ended up ordering the 35s eventhough I wanted the 37s but didnt wanna have issues. Went with a 35x12.5r22

Sent from my SM-A705U using Tapatalk

Posted

Thanks! Here are two photos of the front and rear of the wheel well which shows the amount of trimming I had to do. So you would need to do a little more.

You can see where I trimmed part of the mud flap, I bet you’d need to trim some of the liner as well.
Also depends on the width of the 37.
f4acf5f1ec11f0480d07e286de15b0a1.jpg78e604d91b1811b99b8f3f3c8a7c106e.jpg
What do you have your tire pressures set at?

Sent from my SM-A705U using Tapatalk

Posted
What do you have your tire pressures set at?

 

Sent from my SM-A705U using Tapatalk

 

I was running a lot lower, maybe 55f/50r, which is still way more than plenty according to the load range table. But right now I’m about 65f/75r since I’ve been pulling my fifth wheel frequently, which is still well on the safe end and I could go lower.

 

Note: I’m basing my pressures off the load range table for my tire size. It’s changed by tires size and load rating (E, F, etc).

Al I’m saying is the load range for my tire size will be slightly different than yours

Posted
14 hours ago, 2500hdStud said:

3” Zone Level kit

2” block in rear

Fox 2.0 shocks

12C72925-03EB-4B14-AE90-9F075D2A153E.jpeg

what fox 2.0 shocks did you get? part numbers?

thanks

Posted (edited)

Sorry, I don’t know individual part numbers. 
I can tell you that I purchased kits from liftkits4less.com. 
 

1BC15C19-37BA-4F14-9149-79DBF9515EBB.jpeg

Edited by 2500hdStud

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...