Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
 
Not saying you did. Was just saying there's a post similar to this in the Facebook groups once a week at least and there's a group of guys that like to bash me because I say it's a stupid idea.
 
That being said you took off a lot less then most people I've seen. Most of the ones I've seen they grind the whole bump flat. I think you'll be ok it doesn't look like they took to much off. Just paint them so they don't rust. Maybe even ceramic coat them while you're at it...
 
Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk
 
 Yup definitely getting them painted next week!! The guy who did it said if he had to take anymore off he wouldn’t and I would have to do the rest cause he wasn’t going any lower
 




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
  • 1 year later...
Posted (edited)

I know this is an older thread, but also a common issue. 

Just received my new Fuel Anza wheels 17x8.5 , with P295/70/17 tires all mounted up ready to go. 

 

Unfortunately that brake caliper casting bulge strikes a again. 

4 websites all said these wheels would fit my 2019+ GMC or Silverado 1500. 

 

I have a very similar problem, looks like I will need to shave my calipers down about the same amount as you did to clearance my new rims. 

Just curious if you have seen any problems arise from it. Honestly I don't think it's all that big a deal.

But there is plenty of people out there somewhat freaked out about it. 

 

2021 GMC Fuel Anza pic 3.jpg

2021 GMC Fuel Anza pic 4.jpg

2021 GMC Fuel Anza pic 5.jpg

2021 GMC Fuel Anza pic 1.jpg

2021 GMC Fuel Anza pic 2.jpg

2021 GMC Fuel Anza pic 6.jpg

Edited by cc1999
Posted

Got them clearanced , no problem. Took about 30 min for each front caliber. Took about half that bulge off. 
Rides and drives great. 
I am a happy camper now.
 

859950FD-3863-4F7A-A083-2198BE4A40A5.jpeg

B6E1495E-823B-4029-8970-538716F92534.jpeg

C7CDC655-A4EC-4820-B386-A4D26757D503.jpeg

E6D92112-ED38-4318-9D4A-6C0B7A39F25B.jpeg

AEB46906-1A1C-4E25-8524-6E421C2D6148.jpeg

969EBD68-41A9-40EA-A5E0-0EE1EE28E154.jpeg

  • 2 years later...
Posted
On 12/17/2020 at 9:32 PM, cc1999 said:

Got them clearanced , no problem. Took about 30 min for each front caliber. Took about half that bulge off. 
Rides and drives great. 
I am a happy camper now.
 

859950FD-3863-4F7A-A083-2198BE4A40A5.jpeg

B6E1495E-823B-4029-8970-538716F92534.jpeg

C7CDC655-A4EC-4820-B386-A4D26757D503.jpeg

E6D92112-ED38-4318-9D4A-6C0B7A39F25B.jpeg

AEB46906-1A1C-4E25-8524-6E421C2D6148.jpeg

969EBD68-41A9-40EA-A5E0-0EE1EE28E154.jpeg

Any problems? Also have we concluded whether or not it's a fluid channel or some stupid design?

  • 1 month later...
Posted

So obviously, I'm having the same predicament with my wheels and calipers. I decided to order a used caliper from ebay and I'm going to drill and sand down the hump to see how much metal is there. I've ran a 3/8's hub centric spacer and I'm currently on a 1.25" hub centric spacer. Still, the bigger spacers cause some rubbing and the smaller spacer takes up too much of the wheels stud to where there isn't much threads left. Obviously I'm not happy with the outcome of either spacer but in short I'll post pictures as soon as I get this caliper.

Posted
On 10/22/2019 at 2:20 PM, LTeddy said:

 

So I went this morning to get my rims and tires put on from my previous truck to my new custom trail boss.. fuel maverick 18x9 +14 offset and they did not work spokes were bumping into the little hump on the caliper.. put a 1/4 spacer on no dice.. he ended up grinding that hump pretty far down.. my question is has anyone done this or heard of doing this? Any issues anyone sees of doing this? It’s already done just hoping I didn’t make a bad call 0b2ac034c5a1080ee05201e772748cd2.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

So I ordered a caliper off of ebay to further research this whole hump issue we all have with the new calipers. I actually took them apart and there is nothing behind the piston! So I decided to grind the hump and I actually grinded it all the way flat! I'm still going to drill the caliper through the small passage from inside the piston cup to see how thick the sidewall still is.20230412_094003.thumb.jpg.870884d2c54642b4ee8a4714ce55cd44.jpg20230412_093956.thumb.jpg.713ef439e9515426f0a313958bc3de6d.jpg

Screenshot_20230412_100017_Gallery.jpg

Screenshot_20230412_100042_Gallery.jpg

Posted

The rib across the back of the pistons is to reduce flex or deformation of the caliper. It was engineered there for a reason - taking any of it off is risk vs. reward calculation. 

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, asilverblazer said:

The rib across the back of the pistons is to reduce flex or deformation of the caliper. It was engineered there for a reason - taking any of it off is risk vs. reward calculation. 

Maybe, but if that's the case, wouldn't the inside half of the caliper have the same reinforcements? The rear half actually has less metal in the design, you could actually see the outline of the piston cups. I still plan on cutting the front half down the middle to see how thick the metal actually is on the oil passage part of the caliper. I'm no engineer and I don't have access to those documents, so I won't and can't tell you what GM engineers were thinking or why they designed something a certain way. What I will say is that these calipers look pretty similar to older Brembo caliper designs, but I'm also not saying that they are just that. Either way, what I'm trying to do is provide other people here with some actual measurements and answers to the wonders of these calipers. Being that automotive hydraulic brakes only apply around 400 lbs psi during light to medium use, if there is enough metal there, then there should be no worries about having brake fluid burst the side of the caliper. As far as it flexing under pressure, I can't say much about that either. Unless, I fully grind down and install the caliper, apply brake pressure and take measurements of it to see if there was any flex. Now if you are a GM engineer or have access to such documents, then my apologies and please share the info, it would definitely save me the headache and save everyone else on here the time on trying to find the actual answer to this mystery.

20230412_202432.jpg

20230412_202427.jpg

Posted
7 hours ago, jweezy said:

Maybe, but if that's the case, wouldn't the inside half of the caliper have the same reinforcements?

Not necessarily, the inside of the caliper is loaded differently from the outside. The inside face between the pistons is in tension, which is controlled by the additional metal surrounding the pistons, the outside, where the rib is, is in compression. 

 

7 hours ago, jweezy said:

The rear half actually has less metal in the design

Likely the reason for the rib.

 

7 hours ago, jweezy said:

Either way, what I'm trying to do is provide other people here with some actual measurements and answers to the wonders of these calipers. Being that automotive hydraulic brakes only apply around 400 lbs psi during light to medium use, if there is enough metal there, then there should be no worries about having brake fluid burst the side of the caliper. As far as it flexing under pressure, I can't say much about that either. Unless, I fully grind down and install the caliper, apply brake pressure and take measurements of it to see if there was any flex. Now if you are a GM engineer or have access to such documents, then my apologies and please share the info, it would definitely save me the headache and save everyone else on here the time on trying to find the actual answer to this mystery.

I doubt fluid will burst out of the caliper... Back in the early 2000's GM had Bosch (If memory serves...) assist with the re-design of the brakes on full size trucks. One of the findings was excessive flex of the caliper. The result at that time was poor pedal feel. How much flex was there... don't know.

 

In this case I doubt it would even be measurable. Some material analysis in a computer simulation likely showed it. 

 

In practice, trying to reverse engineer a brake caliper with grinders, tape measure, or any tools any of us have access to won't reveal much. You could grind it off completely and likely never even notice; but there is that one scenario out of ??? that it would be a problem. 

 

Not sure what actual answer to the mystery you would expect to find that you haven't already - grind it off completely. Bolt it on and see what happens is all that's left. Unless we want to wait for the engineer to post his analysis and design of the caliper. :D

 

Not being a jerk or anything, just having a discussion about it.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

It's one of those things where you only find out if you went too far, in a circumstance where you really really wish you hadn't done the mod.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, asilverblazer said:

Not necessarily, the inside of the caliper is loaded differently from the outside. The inside face between the pistons is in tension, which is controlled by the additional metal surrounding the pistons, the outside, where the rib is, is in compression. 

 

Likely the reason for the rib.

 

I doubt fluid will burst out of the caliper... Back in the early 2000's GM had Bosch (If memory serves...) assist with the re-design of the brakes on full size trucks. One of the findings was excessive flex of the caliper. The result at that time was poor pedal feel. How much flex was there... don't know.

 

In this case I doubt it would even be measurable. Some material analysis in a computer simulation likely showed it. 

 

In practice, trying to reverse engineer a brake caliper with grinders, tape measure, or any tools any of us have access to won't reveal much. You could grind it off completely and likely never even notice; but there is that one scenario out of ??? that it would be a problem. 

 

Not sure what actual answer to the mystery you would expect to find that you haven't already - grind it off completely. Bolt it on and see what happens is all that's left. Unless we want to wait for the engineer to post his analysis and design of the caliper. :D

 

Not being a jerk or anything, just having a discussion about it.

 

No I completely appreciate this type of back and forth, it makes multiple minds work together. And by the back half, I meant the half without the rib. And yes, you are right, there's always that one time

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Following this post closely. Im very interested in what JWEEZY finds out about the caliper once he cuts it in half. I have a 2019 High Country that I put aftermarket rims on and have to use .5 spacers, and it drives me nuts to see the different offset on the front and rear tires.

Posted
11 hours ago, richard.bowen1 said:

Following this post closely. Im very interested in what JWEEZY finds out about the caliper once he cuts it in half. I have a 2019 High Country that I put aftermarket rims on and have to use .5 spacers, and it drives me nuts to see the different offset on the front and rear tires.

Sorry man, but you'll have to wait a few more months for this. I ended up having to deployed so I wasn't able to get that done. But I am definitely looking forward to cutting that caliper too. If anything, I would still feel safe grinding down half of that bump. But that still doesn't solve the issue of needing a spacer.

I was running a set of 3/8 inch spacers in the front at first with 2 inch spacers in the rear. That took care of the offset pretty good.

Posted

Would GM add more metal to the caliper, which is more expense and casting complexity for no reason? No, they would not. That caliper rib is there for a reason. 

Removing it makes as much sense as notching your rims for clearance. Use a spacer. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,667 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...