Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’m glad to hear the BDS Fox coilovers are worth the money, because mine are on order. I did go a little different route than the BDS kit. I ordered the 4” Zone kit with the skid plate and the Fox rear shocks. I spoke with Zone about the kit. The engineers for BDS and Zone are the same engineers. The kits are the same except for the front cross member (square vs curved) and the BDS has one extra skid plate. Oh I almost forgot, I was also told the BDS has more logos to show off. The Zone technical person gave me the part numbers to order the BDS Fox coilovers and brackets, same kit so they fit. I did learn the BDS coilovers are not to the same ride spec as the standard Fox coilovers. The engineer told me they are designed so they are not as aggressive and have a softer ride than the standard Fox coilovers.  For the price difference I was able to order the Zone upper control arms ($500) and still save a few hundred dollars. However, I will not get the no questions asked BDS warranty only the Zone warranty. Which I understand Zone fully stands behind their lifts. The only issue right now is long lead times due to getting in parts at both Zone and BDS. I can’t wait to get everything installed. 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Some websites say you can not use the factory 18” TB wheels with this lift. Is that true? Has anyone tried or has everyone upgraded there Rims and Tires. Do you need less offset to work with this kit?  Thank you in advance. 

Posted

I did confirm with BDS as I found multiple sites with their kit for sale not list you needed different wheels for it to work. That is why I asked. Thanks 

Posted
47 minutes ago, 2nazt said:

I did confirm with BDS as I found multiple sites with their kit for sale not list you needed different wheels for it to work. That is why I asked. Thanks 

?? I'd trust BDS before a third-party reseller.

  • Like 1
Posted

I changed mine from the icon stage one to the stage 4, giant difference than before. Rides really nice at 3-3.5 inches up front. The 2.5 coilovers with the 2.5 rear shocks makes a big difference..!!   I even thought of the 4 inch zone for the cross members, that would fix the cv and lower control arm angles.

 

So the bds kit with coilovers is probably the best way to go.

Posted (edited)
On 10/4/2020 at 6:45 PM, 2nazt said:

Some websites say you can not use the factory 18” TB wheels with this lift. Is that true? Has anyone tried or has everyone upgraded there Rims and Tires. Do you need less offset to work with this kit?  Thank you in advance. 

 

Stock 18" OEM wheels have 26MM offset- which is about 5.50" back spacing on a 9" wheel - you need 4.5" backspacing on wheels to clear the tie rod.  That is about <12> MM - I had Method 18x9 with 18mm offset (5.25" of back spacing) and we thought it would work - it did not clear tie rod - had to add 1.25" of spacer and wheel lug extensions to make it work and it just clears.  Not ideal, but works for now - plan to either get 20" or <12> mm 18 inch soon so I can clear without spacers and lug extensions and add larger tires.

 

With 20" wheel you don't have same issue as the tie rod will clear - albeit it is inside the wheel radius. 

Edited by Supercup
  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 10/8/2020 at 11:28 AM, Supercup said:

 

Stock 18" OEM wheels have 26MM offset- which is about 5.50" back spacing on a 9" wheel - you need 4.5" backspacing on wheels to clear the tie rod.  That is about <12> MM - I had Method 18x9 with 18mm offset (5.25" of back spacing) and we thought it would work - it did not clear tie rod - had to add 1.25" of spacer and wheel lug extensions to make it work and it just clears.  Not ideal, but works for now - plan to either get 20" or <12> mm 18 inch soon so I can clear without spacers and lug extensions and add larger tires.

 

With 20" wheel you don't have same issue as the tie rod will clear - albeit it is inside the wheel radius. 

Any update to this? There is no guidance on the BDS instructions regarding 35" tires with 18" wheels. Is that restriction related to these tie rods?  Just running a negative offset wheel (-13 for 9mmW it seems) will allow for the tie rod to clear? And run the larger tires?

 

Thanks

Posted
3 hours ago, iammrrush said:

Any update to this? There is no guidance on the BDS instructions regarding 35" tires with 18" wheels. Is that restriction related to these tie rods?  Just running a negative offset wheel (-13 for 9mmW it seems) will allow for the tie rod to clear? And run the larger tires?

 

Thanks

-12 mm Method 9"x18" clears the tie rod (4.5" backspacing)- question then is will you be able to fit 35" tires - with that offset the wheel is pushed further out.  since the 35" is 12.5" wide, same as the 33" they say will fit with this set up, it would seem that the issues on the 35" will be, with it pushed out another 1", versus a 20" will it require "more" trimming or just not fit at all.  I can say for certain there is no "tire width" issue on the inside.  From the inside of the 275/65/18 I have there is about 4" of inboard clearance (measured with tape).  The tie rod also would not interfere with a 2" wider tire.  So issue to resolve is the taller height and what is the impact?  When I got mine put on they suggested that 33" or 34" would be the way to go with 18's, but never said 35" would not work.

 

The guidance states 35" will fit with 20" with 5.5" - 6.25" pf back spacing - which moves the wheel back in and places the tie rod, within the wheel radius.  Can't draw any conclusions - will probably have to be trial and error at the tire shop! 

 

Here are a few photos of inside clearance with my current set up with the 275/65/18's - which are 32.3" diameter and 11.0" section width wide.  Currently at full lock in reverese the just barely rub on the inside.  So no matter what, with this set up larger tires are going to need trimming - bigger you go, the more it will require.

 

Looks to me like the first pinch point is the gap between the "front" of the tire and the lower corner of the front fender - that has about a 2" gap - so if you went up 4" in diameter (31" to 35") you should have 2" of growth on either side (right?).   That would put the 35" right up against that front fender.  The rear fender gap is 3".      

 

I would say if you want to go with 35" tires the 4" kit (which is 6" overall) may be the safer starting point.   If I do more tire work, I will post up, but not planning to go bigger, unless I get new wheels. 

 

Photos show

1. tie rod clearance

2. Top clearance steering knucle 

3. Top clearnace

4. Front fender clearance - two finger - inside out

5. Front fender clearance - inside out

6. Rear fender clearance - outside in

7. Front fender clearance - inside out 

 

  

IMG_9550.JPG

IMG_9551.JPG

IMG_9552.JPG

IMG_9554.JPG

IMG_9555.JPG

IMG_9556.JPG

IMG_9557.JPG

Posted

Great response, thanks. How far out your fender is the tire sticking out? I may switch to 20" wheels if it will keep the tires further in.

Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Here are a few more photos of tire clearance - with stock 275/65/18 Duratrac's on Method 18 x 9 wheels with 18mm offset - 2.5" BDS Coilover lift on 2020 AT4.

 

first one - front tire - front clearance - straight wheel - looking inside out.

Second one - front clearance - straight wheel - back of tire

third - front clearance - straight sheel - front of tire

fourth - front clearance - 2/3rd turn of wheel - front of tire

fifth - same as fourth - view further away 

 

 

IMG_9555.JPG

IMG_9556.JPG

IMG_9557.JPG

IMG_9591.JPG

IMG_9592.JPG

Posted (edited)

A few more 

 

first - front of tire 2/3 turn

second - front of tire full lock

third - front of tire full lock

fourth - front of tire full lock - just barely misses wheel liner 

 

IMG_9593.JPG

IMG_9595.JPG

IMG_9596.JPG

IMG_9597.JPG

Edited by Supercup
Posted (edited)

Last Few 

 

first one - front 2/3 turn

second one - rear of tire full lock

last one - front of tire - 2/3 lock - closest pinch point - will rub over - larger tires would need this area trimmed. 

IMG_9598.JPG

IMG_9599.JPG

IMG_9600.JPG

Edited by Supercup
  • 2 months later...
Posted

Hello everybody,

  After a two month plus backorder, I was able to get my 2.5" (4" total) BDS lift kit on my AT4. I kept the 18" wheels (-12 offset on 9 in wide) and put on 35x12.5" Nitto Ridge Grapplers. I trimmed a small amount on the front lining due to rubbing at one angle. The bigger issue was in the back that required some trimming of the bracket. Even then, there was a tiny rub that probably would have gone away after a few miles on the road. A couple small hits with the hammer on the bracket allowed the tire to clear without touching. The ridge grapplers are almost a true 35" (actual 34.76") and I think if I had gone with a tire that was 34.5" there wouldn't have been any rubbing on the bracket. You'd still have to trim the mud flap I imagine. If you are concerned and want to give yourself room for error, shoot for ~34.3". The front may be affected more with a stock front bumper, as I have a replacement. The guide on the internet is fairly accurate, but I did not take the bracket off. Just heat and cut.

 

https://wheelsasap.com/gmc-at4-oversized-tire-trimming-guide/

 

I didn't take pictures of the bracket/flap rub on the back, unfortunately. Hope this helps.

 

JR

PXL_20210123_224015049.MP (Large).jpg

PXL_20210123_223949378.MP (Large).jpg

PXL_20210123_224001833.MP (Large).jpg

PXL_20210123_204923774.MP (Large).jpg

Posted

Turned out great!  Thx for the update on the wheels and tire sizing - very helpful.  Next step for me to swap out my current methods for one's with -12mm offset, like you got - gives me a great guide for tire size - probably go with 33/12/5/18 BFG's.   

 

How do you like the ride and performance now that it is installed? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You need a better code reader/scanner.  You are missing codes.  Did the dealer give you a copy of the SAVI scan from that visit?     If the fluid hasn't been changed, change it.  Shudder will likely go away.  
    • TLDR to my other post...   Hard. Pass.  Too many what ifs.     Are you set on a 3.0 Duramax?  Have you considered anything not GM just in case?  If you don't have to have a pickup, lots of other options for $27,000 out there.   
    • I see some red flags.   - No mention in the Carfax if the oil pump belt was changed.  LM2s had a 150,000mi service interval, and its got 164,245mi on it.  So right out the gate it needs about $3000-3500 for that to be done before driving it another 150,000mi.  Belt is at the rear of the engine.     - If something happens to the transmission valve body, the special coverage is expired by mileage.  That will likely be an out of pocket expense, with zero or near zero GM participation if something happened even though its in by time.   - 2020 LM2s seem to need timing chains after 80,000mi at some point.  They fixed this end of 2020/starting 2021 model year engines.  They will usually set a P0016 I think?  There is another $8000-10,000 if it needs a chain.  The main chain is at the back, secondary at the front so the pump belt would be done at the same time if it needed chains.     - Long oil change intervals.  7,000-8,000mi on average, probably close to 0% or perhaps to or beyond 0% on the OLM.  Lots of them not at the dealer which makes me wonder how much of the oil ran through that truck was the proper Dexos D rated 0w20 oil and not just gas engine 0w20, which is not the same at all.     - Long fuel filter changes, again likely taking the fuel filter life to 0% or more.  First one went 28,603, second was done 43,094 miles later at 71,697, from there another 46,452mi to 118,149mi, and then the most recent one 37,026mi later at 155,175mi.  So counting its original fuel filter, its had only 4 fuel filters on it.  No bueno IMO.         Good news?    - It has had only two warranty trips to the dealer.  The first free service (end of December 2020 on the Carfax), and the transmission reprogram recall (end of August 2025 on the Carfax).     - Truck did a LOT of moving, so that might explain the lack of emissions related repairs like bad NOX sensors, bad exhaust temp sensors, bad glow plugs, etc.         The "emissions system checked" could just be how something was flagged for Carfax.  GM dealers have to do SAVI reports for warranty repair orders so they scan the truck.  So its possible that is there for that?  
    • Thank you, @Z45!   NOTE - No all repair shop/Dealers reports to Carfax   That is my main concern.  The CARFAX looks way too clean for a 6 year old anything with 164,245 miles.  Even something known for reliability (like many Toyotas) typically has a lot more replaced, like a Nav screen, interior trim, shock/strut, or brake pads.  And surely the last set of tires (installed at ~58k miles) would be bald unless those were all highway miles.   I'm tempted to pay a local dealer to look up the VIN, but am not sure if that will be worthwhile.  Last time I did this, it was 100% useless, and I felt scammed - they noted the bumper was replaced years ago and that's it.  A 5-year old could spot the accident damage, even though nothing was on the CARFAX.   After giving the dealer a call, the truck may have a hard shift, but they have to verify with their mechanic if that's even a concern.  And I've test driven about a dozen of these now, many near Chicago, and half the trucks shift hard/odd at all throttle positions.  The ones with aftermarket lifts/larger tires shift terrible, and 3 stock trucks shifted so violently I thought the transmission valve body was going out.   At this point I'm conflicted, as I need a vehicle, and am coming up short locally.  Northern trucks in this price range tend to have either multiple owners, a lot of mods (lifts/oversized tires without re-gearing), and are generally in rougher shape.   If this truck showed up in your neighborhood for $27k and you had to purchase it sight-unseen, with the possibility of needing a 10L80 rebuild, torque converter, or rear end - would you do it?  I'm convinced most of the 10L80 trucks I test drove are broken, they can't all shift so bad, with massive flares/slipping/lurching and mis-matched downshifts like a teen driver learning stick.
    • From the spy shots, the front end does look like it's borrowing some styling cues from the Canyon. I'm more interested in the powertrain news than the screens though. If the 3.0 diesel survives into the next generation, that alone will keep a lot of current owners interested.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...